StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search As A Service
  5. Amazon CloudSearch vs Typesense

Amazon CloudSearch vs Typesense

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon CloudSearch
Amazon CloudSearch
Stacks130
Followers152
Votes27
Typesense
Typesense
Stacks70
Followers119
Votes39
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks826

Amazon CloudSearch vs Typesense: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here, we will compare Amazon CloudSearch and Typesense, highlighting the key differences between the two. Both Amazon CloudSearch and Typesense are search solutions, but they have distinct features and functionalities that set them apart from each other. Let's delve into the differences between these two search platforms.

  1. Scalability and Infrastructure: Amazon CloudSearch is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), which means it can automatically scale to handle large amounts of data and traffic. It leverages AWS's infrastructure to ensure high availability and reliability. On the other hand, Typesense is an open-source search engine that can be deployed on any infrastructure of your choice, giving you more control over scalability and the ability to optimize for specific use cases.

  2. Ease of Use and Configuration: Amazon CloudSearch provides a user-friendly interface and API for configuring and managing search indexes, making it relatively easy to set up and get started. It offers features like automatic scaling, multi-lingual support, and relevance tuning. Typesense also offers similar functionalities but may require more manual configuration and customization. It provides a RESTful API and client libraries to interact with the search engine.

  3. Search Features and Customization: Amazon CloudSearch provides a comprehensive set of search features out of the box, including full-text search, faceted search, sorting, and filtering. It also supports advanced features like language-specific text processing, synonyms, and result highlighting. Typesense offers similar search features but may require more effort to set up and configure for specific use cases, such as implementing custom ranking algorithms or handling complex search queries.

  4. Data Handling and Indexing: Amazon CloudSearch provides automatic indexing of data from various sources like databases, AWS S3 buckets, and Amazon DynamoDB tables. It handles data updates and synchronizes indexes in real-time. Typesense also supports indexing data from various sources but may require more custom code or integrations to achieve real-time indexing or handle indexing workflows specific to your application.

  5. Pricing and Cost: Amazon CloudSearch follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you are charged based on the instance type and search requests. It also offers options for reserved instances and discount tiers for predictable workloads. Typesense, being an open-source solution, does not have any direct costs associated with it. However, you may need to consider the cost of infrastructure, maintenance, and support if you choose to deploy it on your own.

  6. Community and Support: Amazon CloudSearch is backed by AWS, providing extensive documentation, support forums, and enterprise-level support options. It also benefits from being part of the larger AWS ecosystem, with integration capabilities with other AWS services. Typesense has a growing community of contributors and users, with documentation, GitHub repository, and community support available. However, the level of professional support may be limited compared to a commercial offering like Amazon CloudSearch.

In summary, Amazon CloudSearch offers a fully managed and scalable search service with an extensive set of features and comprehensive support options. Typesense, on the other hand, provides greater flexibility and control over the search infrastructure but may require more effort to set up and optimize.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon CloudSearch
Amazon CloudSearch
Typesense
Typesense

Amazon CloudSearch enables you to search large collections of data such as web pages, document files, forum posts, or product information. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain, upload the data you want to make searchable to Amazon CloudSearch, and the search service automatically provisions the required technology resources and deploys a highly tuned search index.

It is an open source, typo tolerant search engine that delivers fast and relevant results out-of-the-box. has been built from scratch to offer a delightful, out-of-the-box search experience. From instant search to autosuggest, to faceted search, it has got you covered.

Simple to Configure – You can make your data searchable using the AWS Management Console, API calls, or command line tools. Simply point to a sample set of data, and Amazon CloudSearch automatically proposes a list of index fields and a suggested configuration.;Automatic Scaling For Data & Traffic – Amazon CloudSearch scales up and down seamlessly as the amount of data or query volume changes.;Low Latency, High Throughput – Amazon CloudSearch always stores your index in RAM to ensure low latency and high throughput performance even at large scale. Amazon CloudSearch was created from the same A9 technology that powers search on Amazon.com.;Rich Search Features – Amazon CloudSearch indexes and searches both structured data and plain text. It includes most search features that developers have come to expect from a search engine, such as faceted search, free text search, Boolean search, customizable relevance ranking, query time rank expressions, field weighting, and sorting of results using any field. Amazon CloudSearch also provides near real-time indexing of document updates.;Secure – Amazon CloudSearch uses strong cryptographic methods to authenticate users and prevent unauthorized control of your domains. Amazon CloudSearch supports HTTPS and includes web service interfaces to configure firewall settings that control network access to your domain.
Handles typographical errors elegantly; Simple to set-up and manage; Easy to tailor your search results to perfection; Meticulously designed and optimized for speed
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
826
Stacks
130
Stacks
70
Followers
152
Followers
119
Votes
27
Votes
39
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Managed
  • 7
    Auto-Scaling
  • 5
    Compound Queries
  • 3
    Easy Setup
Pros
  • 5
    Free
  • 4
    Easy to deploy
  • 4
    Facet search
  • 3
    Out-of-the-box dev experience
  • 3
    Open source
Integrations
No integrations available
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
Ruby
Ruby
Linux
Linux
Python
Python
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Amazon CloudSearch, Typesense?

Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that makes it easy for you to deploy, secure, and operate Elasticsearch at scale with zero down time.

Manticore Search

Manticore Search

It is a full-text search engine written in C++ and a fork of Sphinx Search. It's designed to be simple to use, light and fast, while allowing advanced full-text searching. Connectivity is provided via a MySQL compatible protocol or HTTP, making it easy to integrate.

Azure Search

Azure Search

Azure Search makes it easy to add powerful and sophisticated search capabilities to your website or application. Quickly and easily tune search results and construct rich, fine-tuned ranking models to tie search results to business goals. Reliable throughput and storage provide fast search indexing and querying to support time-sensitive search scenarios.

Swiftype

Swiftype

Swiftype is the easiest way to add great search to your website or mobile application.

MeiliSearch

MeiliSearch

It is a powerful, fast, open-source, easy to use, and deploy search engine. The search and indexation are fully customizable and handles features like typo-tolerance, filters, and synonyms.

Quickwit

Quickwit

It is the next-gen search & analytics engine built for logs. It is designed from the ground up to offer cost-efficiency and high reliability on large data sets. Its benefits are most apparent in multi-tenancy or multi-index settings.

Bonsai

Bonsai

Your customers expect fast, near-magical results from your search. Help them find what they’re looking for with Bonsai Elasticsearch. Our fully managed Elasticsearch solution makes it easy to create, manage, and test your app's search.

Azure Cognitive Search

Azure Cognitive Search

It is the only cloud search service with built-in AI capabilities that enrich all types of information to easily identify and explore relevant content at scale. Formerly known as Azure Search, it uses the same integrated Microsoft natural language stack that Bing and Office have used for more than a decade and AI services across vision, language and speech. Spend more time innovating and less time maintaining a complex cloud search solution.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope