Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ActiveMQ vs Hutch: What are the differences?
Developers describe ActiveMQ as "A message broker written in Java together with a full JMS client". Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License. On the other hand, Hutch is detailed as "Inter-Service Communication with RabbitMQ". Hutch is a Ruby library for enabling asynchronous inter-service communication in a service-oriented architecture, using RabbitMQ.
ActiveMQ and Hutch belong to "Message Queue" category of the tech stack.
ActiveMQ and Hutch are both open source tools. It seems that ActiveMQ with 1.5K GitHub stars and 1.05K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Hutch with 712 GitHub stars and 103 GitHub forks.
Pros of ActiveMQ
- Easy to use18
- Open source14
- Efficient13
- JMS compliant10
- High Availability6
- Scalable5
- Distributed Network of brokers3
- Persistence3
- Support XA (distributed transactions)3
- Docker delievery1
- Highly configurable1
- RabbitMQ0
Pros of Hutch
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ActiveMQ
- ONLY Vertically Scalable1
- Support1
- Low resilience to exceptions and interruptions1
- Difficult to scale1
Cons of Hutch
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is ActiveMQ?
What is Hutch?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use ActiveMQ?
What companies use Hutch?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Hutch?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+35