What is Nuxt.js and what are its top alternatives?
Top Alternatives to Nuxt.js
Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.
Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again. ...
Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world. ...
Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web. ...
It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness. ...
Material Design for Angular
Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs. ...
Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices. ...
Nuxt.js alternatives & related posts
- Full stack, one language197
- Best app dev platform available today181
- Data synchronization152
- Focus on your product not the plumbing117
- Open source106
- Hot code pushes105
- Live page updates100
- Latency compensation92
- Ultra-simple development environment38
- Smart Packages29
- Real time awesome28
- Great for beginners23
- Direct Cordova integration22
- Better than Rails16
- Less moving parts15
- It's just amazing13
- Plugins for everything8
- Great community support8
- One command spits out android and ios ready apps.6
- It just works5
- 0 to Production in no time5
- Coding Speed4
- Is Agile in development hybrid(mobile/web)4
- You can grok it in a day. No ng nonsense4
- Easy deployment4
- One Code => 3 Platforms: Web, Android and IOS2
- Easy yet powerful2
- AngularJS Integration2
- Friendly to use1
- Stack available on Codeanywhere1
- Real time1
- High quality, very few bugs1
- Easy Setup1
- Hookie friendly1
- Hard to debug issues on the server-side3
- Heavily CPU bound3
- Does not scale well3
related Meteor posts
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Mixmax was originally built using Meteor as a single monolithic app. As more users began to onboard, we started noticing scaling issues, and so we broke out our first microservice: our Compose service, for writing emails and Sequences, was born as a Node.js service. Soon after that, we broke out all recipient searching and storage functionality to another Node.js microservice, our Contacts service. This practice of breaking out microservices in order to help our system more appropriately scale, by being more explicit about each microservice’s responsibilities, continued as we broke out numerous more microservices.
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting26
- Built with React20
- Easy setup18
- Zero setup16
- Static site generator7
- Simple deployment6
- Frictionless development6
- Incremental static regeneration5
- Filesystem as an API5
- Everything is a function4
- Isomorphic React applications4
- Well Documented3
- Has many examples and integrations2
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)2
related Next.js posts
I'm working as one of the engineering leads in RunaHR. As our platform is a Saas, we thought It'd be good to have an API (We chose Ruby and Rails for this) and a SPA (built with React and Redux ) connected. We started the SPA with Create React App since It's pretty easy to start.
We use Jest as the testing framework and react-testing-library to test React components. In Rails we make tests using RSpec.
Our main database is PostgreSQL, but we also use MongoDB to store some type of data. We started to use Redis for cache and other time sensitive operations.
We have a couple of extra projects: One is an Employee app built with React Native and the other is an internal back office dashboard built with Next.js for the client and Python in the backend side.
We are in the process of adopting Next.js as our React framework and using Storybook to help build our React components in isolation. This new part of our frontend is written in TypeScript, and we use Emotion for CSS/styling. For delivering data, we use GraphQL and Apollo. Jest, Percy, and Cypress are used for testing.
- Starter kit as a base for new project6
- Reusable components (Vue)5
- Open source4
- Allows to use markdown files as articles3
- Generated websites are super fast2
- Blogging website2
- Still young1
- Open source1
related Gridsome posts
- Large community938
- Open source800
- Easy deployment754
- Great frameworks480
- The best glue on the web384
- Continual improvements230
- Good old web180
- Web foundation141
- Community packages130
- Tool support123
- Used by wordpress31
- Excellent documentation30
- Used by Facebook25
- Because of Symfony23
- Dynamic Language16
- Awesome Language and easy to implement14
- Fast development12
- Cheap hosting11
- Very powerful web language11
- Flexibility, syntax, extensibility9
- Because of Laravel9
- Easy to learn7
- Short development lead times7
- Worst popularity quality ratio7
- Fastestest Time to Version 1.0 Deployments7
- Readable Code7
- Easiest deployment6
- Faster then ever6
- Most of the web uses it5
- Open source and large community4
- I have no choice :(4
- Easy to learn, a big community, lot of frameworks3
- Is like one zip of air3
- Has the best ecommerce(Magento,Prestashop,Opencart,etc)3
- Cheap to own3
- Simple, flexible yet Scalable3
- Easy to use and learn3
- Hard not to use2
- Large community, easy setup, easy deployment, framework2
- Safe the planet2
- Walk away2
- Great flexibility. From fast prototyping to large apps2
- Used by STOMT2
- Great developer experience2
- Open source and great framework2
- Fault tolerance2
- Interpreted at the run time2
- So easy to learn, good practices are hard to find19
- Inconsistent API16
- Fragmented community8
- Not secure5
- No routing system2
- Hard to debug1
related PHP posts
When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?
So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.
React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.
Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.
Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:
- Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
- npm as package manager
- NestJS as Node.js framework
- TypeScript as programming language
- ExpressJS as web server
- Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
- Postman as a tool for API development
- TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
- JSON Web Token for access token management
The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:
- Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
- UI components1.2K
- Great docs776
- HTML, CSS, and JS framework466
- Open source410
- Widely used375
- HTML framework241
- Mobile first75
- Easy setup75
- Great grid system56
- Great community49
- Future compatibility38
- Very powerful foundational front-end framework27
- Build faster prototypes19
- Good for a person who hates CSS7
- Easy to setup and learn4
- Rapid development4
- Love it4
- Great and easy to make a responsive website2
- Sprzedam opla2
- Powerful grid system, Rapid development, Customization2
- Clean and quick frontend development2
- Easy to use2
- Great customer support2
- The fame1
- Easy setup21
- Painless front end development1
- So clean and simple1
- Numerous components1
- Pre-Defined components1
- Great and easy1
- It's fast1
- Great and easy to use1
- Responsive design1
- Design Agnostic1
- Provide angular wrapper1
- Love the classes?1
- Felxible, comfortable, user-friendly1
- Every site uses the defaults14
- Too much heavy decoration in default look11
- Grid system break points aren't ideal11
- Verbose styles7
related Bootstrap posts
I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.
I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).
As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.
Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.
Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.
Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.
Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.
Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.
Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.
Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)
related Animate.css posts
- Ui components114
- Backed by google62
- Backed by angular50
- Open source34
- Easy to learn31
- Quick to develop28
- Easy to start8
- Flexbox Layouts4
- I like its design3
- Great community3
- Great extensions2
- It's the best looking out of the box1
- Seamless integration with AngularJS but lack of docs1
- Progressive Web Apps - to learn0
- No practical examples3
related Material Design for Angular posts
- Responsive grid158
- Mobile first92
- Open source79
- Quick to prototype51
- Simple ui50
- Best practices44
- Easy setup39
- Neutral style6
- HTML, SCSS and JS6
- Accessibility support5
- Xy grid3
- Every new version is smaller, smarter & more efficient2
- Requires jQuery4
- Awful site4
related Foundation posts
ReactQL is written in TypeScript to provide full types/Intellisense, and pick up hard-to-diagnose goofs that might later show up at runtime. React makes heavy use of Webpack 4 to handle transforming your code to an optimised client-side bundle, and in throws back just enough code needed for the initial render, while seamlessly handling
import statements asynchronously as needed, making the payload your user downloads ultimately much smaller than trying to do it by hand.
React Helmet was chosen to handle
<head> content, because it works universally, making it easy to throw back the correct
<title> and other tags on the initial render, as well as inject new tags for subsequent client-side views.
<style> tags when using #StyledComponents.
React Router handles routing, because it works both on the server and in the client. ReactQL customises it further by capturing non-200 responses on the server, redirecting or throwing back custom 404 pages as needed.
Koa is the web server that handles all incoming HTTP requests, because it's fast (TTFB < 5ms, even after fully rendering React), and its natively #async, making it easy to async/await inside routes and middleware.