Alternatives to Blazor logo

Alternatives to Blazor

React, JavaScript, Vaadin, Xamarin, and Flutter are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Blazor.
282
423
+ 1
150

What is Blazor and what are its top alternatives?

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.
Blazor is a tool in the Low Code Platforms category of a tech stack.
Blazor is an open source tool with 9.3K GitHub stars and 687 GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Blazor's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Blazor

  • React

    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • JavaScript

    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Vaadin

    Vaadin

    It is the fastest way to build web applications in Java. It automates the communication between your server and the browser and gives you a high-level component API for all Vaadin components ...

  • Xamarin

    Xamarin

    Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch. ...

  • Flutter

    Flutter

    Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android. ...

  • Google App Maker

    Google App Maker

    App Maker lets you develop powerful apps with relative ease. Create a model to manage your data, build a UI in the visual editor, use Apps Script to write some scripts, and you're on your way. ...

  • Retool

    Retool

    Retool is the fast way to build internal tools. Drag-and-drop our building blocks and connect them to your databases and APIs to build your own tools, instantly. Built by developers, for developers. Trusted by startups and Fortune 500s. ...

  • Microsoft PowerApps

    Microsoft PowerApps

    It is a suite of apps, services, connectors and data platform that provides a rapid application development environment to build custom apps for your business needs. Using Power Apps, you can quickly build custom business apps that connect to your business data stored either in the underlying data platform (Common Data Service) or in various online and on-premises data sources (SharePoint, Excel, Office 365, Dynamics 365, SQL Server, and so on). ...

Blazor alternatives & related posts

React logo

React

113.3K
90.9K
3.8K
A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
113.3K
90.9K
+ 1
3.8K
PROS OF REACT
  • 760
    Components
  • 652
    Virtual dom
  • 563
    Performance
  • 486
    Simplicity
  • 436
    Composable
  • 175
    Data flow
  • 159
    Declarative
  • 124
    Isn't an mvc framework
  • 113
    Reactive updates
  • 111
    Explicit app state
  • 32
    JSX
  • 23
    Learn once, write everywhere
  • 19
    Uni-directional data flow
  • 16
    Easy to Use
  • 14
    Works great with Flux Architecture
  • 10
    Great perfomance
  • 8
    Built by Facebook
  • 7
    Javascript
  • 5
    TypeScript support
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Feels like the 90s
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 4
    Easy to start
  • 4
    Awesome
  • 3
    Fancy third party tools
  • 3
    Hooks
  • 3
    Functional
  • 3
    Server side views
  • 3
    Props
  • 2
    Rich ecosystem
  • 2
    Obama
  • 2
    Very gentle learning curve
  • 2
    Has functional components
  • 2
    Simple
  • 2
    Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
  • 2
    Super easy
  • 2
    Has arrow functions
  • 2
    Strong Community
  • 2
    Great migration pathway for older systems
  • 2
    SSR
  • 2
    Fast evolving
  • 2
    Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
  • 2
    Excellent Documentation
  • 2
    Scales super well
  • 2
    Just the View of MVC
  • 2
    Server Side Rendering
  • 2
    Cross-platform
  • 1
    Fragments
  • 1
    Start simple
  • 1
    Every decision architecture wise makes sense
  • 1
    Permissively-licensed
  • 1
    Beautiful and Neat Component Management
  • 1
    Sdfsdfsdf
  • 1
    Allows creating single page applications
  • 1
    Split your UI into components with one true state
  • 1
    Sharable
CONS OF REACT
  • 35
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 23
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 21
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 8
    JSX
  • 7
    Not enterprise friendly
  • 4
    One-way binding only
  • 2
    State consistency with backend neglected
  • 2
    Bad Documentation

related React posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 1.6M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more
Adebayo Akinlaja
Engineering Manager at Andela · | 26 upvotes · 780.7K views

I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.

A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.

In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.

If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.

See more
JavaScript logo

JavaScript

223.8K
173.2K
7.8K
Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
223.8K
173.2K
+ 1
7.8K
PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
  • 1.6K
    Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 1.5K
    It's everywhere
  • 1.1K
    Lots of great frameworks
  • 887
    Fast
  • 736
    Light weight
  • 416
    Flexible
  • 383
    You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
  • 284
    Non-blocking i/o
  • 233
    Ubiquitousness
  • 188
    Expressive
  • 51
    Extended functionality to web pages
  • 44
    Relatively easy language
  • 42
    Executed on the client side
  • 26
    Relatively fast to the end user
  • 22
    Pure Javascript
  • 17
    Functional programming
  • 11
    Async
  • 8
    Setup is easy
  • 7
    Because I love functions
  • 7
    JavaScript is the New PHP
  • 7
    Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
  • 7
    Its everywhere
  • 7
    Full-stack
  • 6
    Expansive community
  • 6
    Future Language of The Web
  • 6
    Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
  • 5
    Evolution of C
  • 5
    Everyone use it
  • 5
    Love-hate relationship
  • 5
    Easy to hire developers
  • 5
    Supports lambdas and closures
  • 5
    Agile, packages simple to use
  • 5
    Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
  • 5
    For the good parts
  • 4
    Everywhere
  • 4
    Hard not to use
  • 4
    Promise relationship
  • 4
    Scope manipulation
  • 4
    It's fun
  • 4
    Client processing
  • 4
    Nice
  • 4
    Easy to make something
  • 4
    Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
  • 4
    Easy
  • 4
    Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
  • 4
    Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
  • 4
    Most Popular Language in the World
  • 4
    It let's me use Babel & Typescript
  • 4
    What to add
  • 4
    Clojurescript
  • 4
    Function expressions are useful for callbacks
  • 4
    No need to use PHP
  • 4
    Its fun and fast
  • 4
    Powerful
  • 4
    Versitile
  • 4
    Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
  • 4
    1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 4
    Stockholm Syndrome
  • 3
    Because it is so simple and lightweight
  • 3
    Only Programming language on browser
  • 2
    JavaScript j.s
  • 2
    Acoperișul 0757604335
CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
  • 21
    A constant moving target, too much churn
  • 20
    Horribly inconsistent
  • 14
    Javascript is the New PHP
  • 8
    No ability to monitor memory utilitization
  • 6
    Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
  • 5
    Can be ugly
  • 4
    Thinks strange results are better than errors
  • 2
    No GitHub
  • 1
    Slow

related JavaScript posts

Zach Holman

Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

See more
Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 39 upvotes · 4.2M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
Vaadin logo

Vaadin

144
195
33
Components and tools for building web apps in Java
144
195
+ 1
33
PROS OF VAADIN
  • 8
    Java
  • 6
    Open Source
  • 6
    Compatibility
  • 5
    Components
  • 3
    Performance
  • 2
    Abstraction
  • 2
    Example packages
  • 1
    OSGI Support
CONS OF VAADIN
  • 3
    Paid for more features

related Vaadin posts

Xamarin logo

Xamarin

1.2K
1.4K
775
Create iOS, Android and Mac apps in C#
1.2K
1.4K
+ 1
775
PROS OF XAMARIN
  • 120
    Power of c# on mobile devices
  • 80
    Native performance
  • 77
    Native apps with native ui controls
  • 71
    No javascript - truely compiled code
  • 67
    Sharing more than 90% of code over all platforms
  • 45
    Ability to leverage visual studio
  • 44
    Many great c# libraries
  • 43
    Mvvm pattern
  • 36
    Amazing support
  • 34
    Powerful platform for .net developers
  • 19
    GUI Native look and Feel
  • 15
    Nuget package manager
  • 11
    Free
  • 9
    Backed by Microsoft
  • 9
    Enables code reuse on server
  • 8
    Faster Development
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 7
    It's free since Apr 2016
  • 7
    Use of third-party .NET libraries
  • 7
    Best performance than other cross-platform
  • 7
    Easy Debug and Trace
  • 6
    Xamarin.forms is the best, it's amazing
  • 6
    Mac IDE (Xamarin Studio)
  • 5
    Power of C#, no javascript, visual studio
  • 5
    C# mult paradigm language
  • 4
    Microsoft backed
  • 4
    Great docs
  • 4
    Compatible to develop Hybrid apps
  • 4
    Microsoft stack
  • 4
    That just work for every scenario
  • 3
    Small learning curve for Mobile developers
  • 3
    Well Designed
  • 2
    Ability to leverage legacy C and C++
  • 2
    Ionic
CONS OF XAMARIN
  • 8
    Build times
  • 5
    Visual Studio
  • 3
    Scalability
  • 3
    Complexity
  • 3
    Price
  • 2
    Nuget
  • 2
    Maturity
  • 2
    Build Tools
  • 2
    Support
  • 0
    Maturidade
  • 0
    Performance

related Xamarin posts

Greg Neumann

Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

See more
William Miller

We are developing an AWS IoT app for large boats. The IoT devices have sensors all over the boat for engine oil pressure, position, water depth, fuel level, crew location, etc. When the boat has internet, we interact with AWS cloud using lambda and Amazon DynamoDB. When the boat is offshore, the captain and crew still need normal and emergency alerts and real-time sensor information. The crew might have an Android or IoS phone or a Windows or macOS PC to receive alerts and interact with sensors. We may use the AWS GreenGrasss edge computing solution and either MQTT or HTML for that function.

Question: We want to develop a cross-platform client to run on Windows, Mac, Android, IOS, and possibly Linux. We are primarily Python programmers, so PyQt or Kivy are options for us, but we have heard good things about React Native, Flutter, Xamarin, and others. We think an AWS Greengrass core on an RPI4 could communicate to the client with MQTT or a local webserver with a client web interface.

Any thoughts would be much appreciated.

See more
Flutter logo

Flutter

7.9K
8.2K
919
Cross-platform mobile framework from Google
7.9K
8.2K
+ 1
919
PROS OF FLUTTER
  • 111
    Hot Reload
  • 90
    Performance
  • 90
    Cross platform
  • 73
    Backed by Google
  • 61
    Compiled into Native Code
  • 46
    Open Source
  • 45
    Fast Development
  • 42
    Fast Prototyping
  • 41
    Expressive and Flexible UI
  • 34
    Single Codebase
  • 32
    Reactive Programming
  • 26
    Material Design
  • 21
    Widget-based
  • 21
    Target to Fuchsia
  • 20
    Dart
  • 15
    IOS + Android
  • 12
    Easy to learn
  • 12
    Great CLI Support
  • 12
    Tooling
  • 11
    You can use it as mobile, web, Server development
  • 10
    Have built-in Material theme
  • 9
    Debugging quickly
  • 9
    Support by multiple IDE: Android Studio, VS Code, XCode
  • 8
    Community
  • 8
    Target to Android
  • 8
    Easy Testing Support
  • 7
    Good docs & sample code
  • 7
    Have built-in Cupertino theme
  • 7
    Written by Dart, which is easy to read code
  • 7
    Target to iOS
  • 6
    Easy to Widget Test
  • 6
    Flutter is awesome
  • 6
    Real platform free framework of the future
  • 6
    Easy to Unit Test
CONS OF FLUTTER
  • 28
    Need to learn Dart
  • 10
    No 3D Graphics Engine Support
  • 9
    Lack of community support
  • 6
    Graphics programming
  • 6
    Lack of friendly documentation
  • 2
    Lack of promotion
  • 1
    Https://iphtechnologies.com/difference-between-flutter

related Flutter posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 1.6M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more

I've been juggling with an app idea and am clueless about how to build it.

A little about the app:

  • Social network type app ,
  • Users can create different directories, in those directories post images and/or text that'll be shared on a public dashboard .

Directory creation is the main point of this app. Besides there'll be rooms(groups),chatting system, search operations similar to instagram,push notifications

I have two options:

  1. React Native, Python, AWS stack or
  2. Flutter, Go ( I don't know what stack or tools to use)
See more
Google App Maker logo

Google App Maker

162
213
0
Low-code application development for G Suite
162
213
+ 1
0
PROS OF GOOGLE APP MAKER
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF GOOGLE APP MAKER
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Google App Maker posts

      Retool logo

      Retool

      79
      123
      0
      Build custom internal tools, fast.
      79
      123
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF RETOOL
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF RETOOL
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Retool posts

          Mark Weeks
          Group Product Manager at ServiceTitan · | 3 upvotes · 29.3K views

          I'm standing up a web app that needs functionality, including profiles, directory, scheduling, video meeting, and payments.

          I considered Wix, but I'm not sure it will meet these needs. I'm interested in no code / low code tools in order to move quickly but struggling to navigate through all the options. Any advice on how to select no code / low code tools like Webflow, Bubble, stackbit, Retool, BaseDash, Glide , airkit, adalo, stacker, unqork, tiled, airtable, zapier, v.one, candu, bravo studio, amazon honeycode, unstack, dittofi, makerpad, softr, appsheet, etc.?

          See more
          Microsoft PowerApps logo

          Microsoft PowerApps

          77
          89
          0
          Quickly build and share low-code apps
          77
          89
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF MICROSOFT POWERAPPS
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF MICROSOFT POWERAPPS
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Microsoft PowerApps posts