Alternatives to zeroheight logo

Alternatives to zeroheight

Storybook, Confluence, JavaScript, Git, and GitHub are the most popular alternatives and competitors to zeroheight.
50
104
+ 1
0

What is zeroheight and what are its top alternatives?

zeroheight helps teams create, manage and maintain their design systems. Using zeroheight, designers, engineers, and product teams can collaborate and build design systems that can be easily shared across teams.
zeroheight is a tool in the Documentation as a Service & Tools category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to zeroheight

  • Storybook
    Storybook

    It is an open source tool for developing UI components in isolation for React, Vue, and Angular. It makes building stunning UIs organized and efficient. ...

  • Confluence
    Confluence

    Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Swagger UI
    Swagger UI

    Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API ...

  • jsdoc
    jsdoc

    JSDoc 3 is an API documentation generator for JavaScript, similar to JavaDoc or PHPDoc. You add documentation comments directly to your source code, right along side the code itself. The JSDoc Tool will scan your source code, and generate a complete HTML documentation website for you. ...

  • Apiary
    Apiary

    It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves. ...

  • Docusaurus
    Docusaurus

    Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites. ...

  • Gitbook
    Gitbook

    It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team. ...

zeroheight alternatives & related posts

Storybook logo

Storybook

1.4K
631
0
Build bulletproof UI components faster
1.4K
631
+ 1
0
PROS OF STORYBOOK
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF STORYBOOK
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Storybook posts

      Robert Zuber

      We are in the process of adopting Next.js as our React framework and using Storybook to help build our React components in isolation. This new part of our frontend is written in TypeScript, and we use Emotion for CSS/styling. For delivering data, we use GraphQL and Apollo. Jest, Percy, and Cypress are used for testing.

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      BitBitStorybookStorybook

      Hi Team,

      I need a UI component library where i should be able to integrate with the Angular framework and develop components and again i should be able to deploy them in an isolated environment which should not impact the app.

      I am using Storybook, due to some glitch in storybook new version, We could not able to see the source code in the deployed version.

      We mainly use storybook for demo purposes where we show the code as well. So please help, can I use Bit for my requirement?

      See more
      Confluence logo

      Confluence

      25.9K
      18.9K
      202
      One place to share, find, and collaborate on information
      25.9K
      18.9K
      + 1
      202
      PROS OF CONFLUENCE
      • 94
        Wiki search power
      • 62
        WYSIWYG editor
      • 43
        Full featured, works well with embedded docs
      • 3
        Expensive licenses
      CONS OF CONFLUENCE
      • 3
        Expensive license

      related Confluence posts

      David Ritsema
      Frontend Architect at Herman Miller · | 11 upvotes · 703.6K views

      We knew how we wanted to build our Design System, now it was time to choose the tools to get us there. The essence of Scrum is a small team of people. The team is highly flexible and adaptive. Perfect, so we'll work in 2 week sprints where each sprint can be a mix of new R&D stories, a presentation of decisions made, and showcasing key development milestones.

      We are also able to run content stories in parallel, focusing development efforts around key areas of the site that our authors need first. Our stories would exist in a Jira backlog, documentation would be hosted in Confluence , and GitHub would host our codebase. If developers identify technical improvements during the sprint, they can be added as GitHub issues and transferred to Jira if we decide to represent them as stories for the Backlog. For Sprint Retrospectives, @groupmap proved to be a great way to include our remote members of the dev team.

      This worked well for our team and allowed us to be flexible in what we wanted to build and how we wanted to build it. As we further defined our Backlog and estimated each story, we could accurately measure the team's capacity (velocity) and confidently estimate a launch date.

      See more
      Priit Kaasik
      Engineering Lead at Katana MRP · | 9 upvotes · 553.5K views

      As a new company we could early adopt and bet on #RemoteTeam setup without cultural baggage derailing us. Our building blocks for developing remote working culture are:

      • Hiring people who are self sufficient, self-disciplined and excel at video and written communication to work remotely
      • Set up periodic ceremonies ( #DailyStandup, #Grooming, Release calls and chats etc) to keep the company rhythm / heartbeat going across remote cells
      • Regularly train your leaders to take into account remote working aspects of organizing f2f calls, events, meetups, parties etc. when communicating and organizing workflows
      • And last, but not least - select the right tools to support effective communication and collaboration:
      1. All feeds and conversations come together in Slack
      2. #Agile workflows in Jira
      3. InProductCommunication and #CustomerSupportChat in Intercom
      4. #Notes, #Documentation and #Requirements in Confluence
      5. #SourceCode and ContinuousDelivery in Bitbucket
      6. Persistent video streams between locations, demos, meetings run on appear.in
      7. #Logging and Alerts in Papertrail
      See more
      Postman logo

      Postman

      92.4K
      79.2K
      1.8K
      Only complete API development environment
      92.4K
      79.2K
      + 1
      1.8K
      PROS OF POSTMAN
      • 490
        Easy to use
      • 369
        Great tool
      • 276
        Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
      • 156
        Easy setup, looks good
      • 144
        The best api workflow out there
      • 53
        It's the best
      • 53
        History feature
      • 44
        Adds real value to my workflow
      • 43
        Great interface that magically predicts your needs
      • 35
        The best in class app
      • 12
        Can save and share script
      • 10
        Fully featured without looking cluttered
      • 8
        Collections
      • 8
        Option to run scrips
      • 8
        Global/Environment Variables
      • 7
        Shareable Collections
      • 7
        Dead simple and useful. Excellent
      • 7
        Dark theme easy on the eyes
      • 6
        Awesome customer support
      • 6
        Great integration with newman
      • 5
        Documentation
      • 5
        Simple
      • 5
        The test script is useful
      • 4
        Saves responses
      • 4
        This has simplified my testing significantly
      • 4
        Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
      • 4
        Easy as pie
      • 3
        API-network
      • 3
        I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
      • 3
        Mocking API calls with predefined response
      • 2
        Now supports GraphQL
      • 2
        Postman Runner CI Integration
      • 2
        Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
      • 2
        Continuous integration using newman
      • 2
        Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
      • 2
        Runner
      • 2
        Graph
      • 1
        <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
      CONS OF POSTMAN
      • 10
        Stores credentials in HTTP
      • 9
        Bloated features and UI
      • 8
        Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
      • 7
        Poor GraphQL support
      • 5
        Expensive
      • 3
        Not free after 5 users
      • 3
        Can't prompt for per-request variables
      • 1
        Import swagger
      • 1
        Support websocket
      • 1
        Import curl

      related Postman posts

      Noah Zoschke
      Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 2.7M views

      We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

      Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

      Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

      This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

      Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

      Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

      Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

      See more
      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 4.7M views

      Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

      • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
      • npm as package manager
      • NestJS as Node.js framework
      • TypeScript as programming language
      • ExpressJS as web server
      • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
      • Postman as a tool for API development
      • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
      • JSON Web Token for access token management

      The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

      • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
      • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
      • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
      • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
      See more
      Swagger UI logo

      Swagger UI

      1.9K
      1.7K
      207
      A Collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation
      1.9K
      1.7K
      + 1
      207
      PROS OF SWAGGER UI
      • 49
        Open Source
      • 34
        Can execute api calls from the documentation
      • 29
        Free to use
      • 19
        Customizable
      • 14
        Easy to implement in .Net
      • 13
        Mature, clean spec
      • 12
        API Visualization
      • 9
        Coverage
      • 6
        Scaffolding
      • 6
        Easy to use
      • 5
        Vibrant and active community
      • 4
        Elegant
      • 3
        Adopted by tm forum api
      • 2
        Clear for React
      • 1
        Api
      • 1
        Can deploy API to AWS API Gateway and AWS Lambda
      CONS OF SWAGGER UI
      • 3
        Need to learn YAML and RAML
      • 2
        Documentation doesn't look that good
      • 1
        Doesn't generate code snippets in different languages
      • 1
        You don’t actually get in-line error highlighting
      • 1
        Does not support hypermedia

      related Swagger UI posts

      Noah Zoschke
      Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 2.7M views

      We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

      Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

      Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

      This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

      Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

      Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

      Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

      See more
      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 4.7M views

      Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

      • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
      • npm as package manager
      • NestJS as Node.js framework
      • TypeScript as programming language
      • ExpressJS as web server
      • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
      • Postman as a tool for API development
      • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
      • JSON Web Token for access token management

      The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

      • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
      • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
      • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
      • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
      See more
      jsdoc logo

      jsdoc

      580
      155
      5
      An API documentation generator for JavaScript
      580
      155
      + 1
      5
      PROS OF JSDOC
      • 2
        Far less verbose
      • 1
        Simpler type safe than TypeScript
      • 1
        No compiler needed
      • 1
        Does almost everything TS does
      CONS OF JSDOC
        Be the first to leave a con

        related jsdoc posts

        Salina Acharya
        Senior Software Engineer at Datamine Software · | 6 upvotes · 147.3K views
        Shared insights
        on
        jsdocjsdocDocusaurusDocusaurusReactReact

        Hello, I need to write documentation for my React codebase. I am tossing between Docusaurus and jsdoc. I liked everything about Docusaurus but then it doesn't seem to generate a web file like jsdoc does once the code is commented with the required tags. I was hoping I could get some advice on which tool to go with for my React application.

        See more
        Apiary logo

        Apiary

        232
        325
        109
        Integrated API documentation, prototyping and testing
        232
        325
        + 1
        109
        PROS OF APIARY
        • 29
          Easy to use
        • 19
          Free to use
        • 12
          Traffic inspector
        • 11
          Free
        • 10
          Collaboration
        • 7
          Mock API
        • 4
          Dashboard
        • 3
          Customization
        • 2
          30 Days Trial
        • 2
          Access Control
        • 2
          Documentation
        • 2
          Validate API Documentation
        • 1
          API explorer
        • 1
          Clean syntax
        • 1
          Provisioning
        • 1
          Shared API blueprint templates
        • 1
          Github integration helps with collaboration
        • 1
          Code auto-generation
        CONS OF APIARY
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Apiary posts

          Docusaurus logo

          Docusaurus

          226
          410
          34
          Easy to maintain open source documentation websites
          226
          410
          + 1
          34
          PROS OF DOCUSAURUS
          • 7
            Open Source
          • 7
            Self Hosted
          • 3
            MDX
          • 3
            I18n
          • 3
            Free to use
          • 3
            React
          • 3
            Easy customization
          • 3
            Jamstack
          • 2
            Versioning
          CONS OF DOCUSAURUS
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Docusaurus posts

            Salina Acharya
            Senior Software Engineer at Datamine Software · | 6 upvotes · 147.3K views
            Shared insights
            on
            jsdocjsdocDocusaurusDocusaurusReactReact

            Hello, I need to write documentation for my React codebase. I am tossing between Docusaurus and jsdoc. I liked everything about Docusaurus but then it doesn't seem to generate a web file like jsdoc does once the code is commented with the required tags. I was hoping I could get some advice on which tool to go with for my React application.

            See more
            Gitbook logo

            Gitbook

            213
            344
            10
            Document Everything! For you, your users and your team
            213
            344
            + 1
            10
            PROS OF GITBOOK
            • 6
              Prueba
            • 4
              Integrated high-quality editor
            CONS OF GITBOOK
            • 1
              No longer Git or Open
            • 1
              Just sync with GitHub

            related Gitbook posts