Alternatives to VuePress logo

Alternatives to VuePress

Nuxt.js, Jekyll, Hugo, WordPress, and Gridsome are the most popular alternatives and competitors to VuePress.
365
418
+ 1
8

What is VuePress and what are its top alternatives?

A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.
VuePress is a tool in the Static Site Generators category of a tech stack.
VuePress is an open source tool with 22.7K GitHub stars and 4.8K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to VuePress's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to VuePress

  • Nuxt.js
    Nuxt.js

    Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more. ...

  • Jekyll
    Jekyll

    Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories. ...

  • Hugo
    Hugo

    Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data. ...

  • WordPress
    WordPress

    The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family. ...

  • Gridsome
    Gridsome

    Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again. ...

  • Docsify
    Docsify

    Docsify generates your documentation website on the fly without generating static html files. Instead, it loads and parses your Markdown files and displays them as a website. ...

  • Docusaurus
    Docusaurus

    Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites. ...

  • Gitbook
    Gitbook

    It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team. ...

VuePress alternatives & related posts

Nuxt.js logo

Nuxt.js

2K
371
The Vue.js Framework
2K
371
PROS OF NUXT.JS
  • 61
    SSR
  • 47
    Automatic routes
  • 33
    Middleware
  • 29
    Hot code reloading
  • 22
    Easy setup, easy to use, great community, FRENCH TOUCH
  • 22
    SPA
  • 21
    Static Websites
  • 20
    Code splitting for every page
  • 19
    Plugins
  • 18
    Custom layouts
  • 15
    Automatic transpilation and bundling (with webpack and
  • 13
    Modules ecosystem
  • 13
    Easy setup
  • 11
    Pages directory
  • 11
    Amazing Developer Experience
  • 11
    Vibrant and helpful community
  • 5
    Its Great for Team Development
CONS OF NUXT.JS
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Nuxt.js posts

    Simon Reymann
    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 24 upvotes · 5M views

    Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

    • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
    • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
    • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
    • TypeScript as programming language
    • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
    • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
    • Jest as testing framework
    • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
    • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

    The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

    • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
    • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
    • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
    • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
    • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
    • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
    See more
    Nikolaj Ivancic

    I want to build a documentation tool - functionally equivalent to MkDocs. The initial choice ought to be VuePress - but I know of at least one respectable developer who started with VuePress and switched to Nuxt.js. A rich set of "themes" is a plus and all documents ought to be in Markdown.

    Any opinions?

    See more
    Jekyll logo

    Jekyll

    1.9K
    230
    Blog-aware, static site generator in Ruby
    1.9K
    230
    PROS OF JEKYLL
    • 74
      Github pages integration
    • 54
      Open source
    • 37
      It's slick, customisable and hackerish
    • 24
      Easy to deploy
    • 23
      Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset
    • 7
      Gitlab pages integration
    • 5
      Best for blogging
    • 2
      Low maintenance
    • 2
      Easy to integrate localization
    • 1
      Huge plugins ecosystem
    • 1
      Authoring freedom and simplicity
    CONS OF JEKYLL
    • 4
      Build time increases exponentially as site grows
    • 2
      Lack of developments lately
    • 1
      Og doesn't work with postings dynamically

    related Jekyll posts

    Dale Ross
    Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.7M views

    I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

    I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

    Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

    See more
    Jan Vlnas
    Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 6 upvotes · 67.5K views

    Depends on what options and technologies you have available, and how do you deploy your website.

    There are CMSs which update existing static pages through FTP: You provide access credentials, mark editable parts of your HTML in a markup, and then edit the content through the hosted CMS. I know two systems which work like that: Cushy CMS and Surreal CMS.

    If the source of your site is versioned through Git (and hosted on GitHub), you have other options, like Netlify CMS, Spinal CMS, Siteleaf, Forestry, or CloudCannon. Some of these also need you to use static site generator (like 11ty, Jekyll, or Hugo).

    If you have some server-side scripting support available (typically PHP) you can also consider some flat-file based, server-side systems, like Kirby CMS or Lektor, which are usually simpler to retrofit into an existing template than “traditional” CMSs (WordPress, Drupal).

    Finally, you could also use a desktop-based static site generator which provides a user-friendly GUI, and then locally generates and uploads the website. For example Publii, YouDoCMS, Agit CMS.

    See more
    Hugo logo

    Hugo

    1.3K
    206
    A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator written in Go
    1.3K
    206
    PROS OF HUGO
    • 47
      Lightning fast
    • 29
      Single Executable
    • 26
      Easy setup
    • 24
      Great development community
    • 23
      Open source
    • 13
      Write in golang
    • 8
      Not HTML only - JSON, RSS
    • 8
      Hacker mindset
    • 7
      LiveReload built in
    • 4
      Gitlab pages integration
    • 4
      Easy to customize themes
    • 4
      Very fast builds
    • 3
      Well documented
    • 3
      Fast builds
    • 3
      Easy to learn
    CONS OF HUGO
    • 4
      No Plugins/Extensions
    • 2
      Template syntax not friendly
    • 1
      Quick builds

    related Hugo posts

    John-Daniel Trask
    Co-founder & CEO at Raygun · | 19 upvotes · 344.9K views
    Shared insights
    on
    .NET.NETWordPressWordPressHugoHugo
    at

    There’s no doubt WordPress is a great CMS, which is very user friendly. When we started the company, our blog wasn’t really our top priority, and it ended up being hosted on a fairly obscure server within our setup, which didn’t really change much until recently when things become harder to manage and make significant updates.

    As our marketing team increased, the amount of traffic that found us through our content marketing increased. We found ourselves struggling to maintain our Wordpress install given the amount of theme updates, plugins and security patches needing to be applied. Our biggest driver to find an alternative solution however was just how slow Wordpress is at serving content to the end user. I know there will be die hard fans out there with ways to set things up that mean WordPress sites can load quickly, but we needed something a lot more streamlined.

    We could see in our own Real User Monitoring tool that many users were experiencing page load speeds of over five seconds, even longer in worst case scenarios. Hugo is an open source static site generator that has enabled us to reduce load times by over 500% and make our blog far more maintainable across the whole team.

    The Raygun marketing site runs on a .NET CMS called N2 but we plan to swap that out with Hugo as well in future.

    #StaticSiteGenerators #SelfHostedBloggingCms #SupportSalesAndMarketing

    See more
    Jan Vlnas
    Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 6 upvotes · 67.5K views

    Depends on what options and technologies you have available, and how do you deploy your website.

    There are CMSs which update existing static pages through FTP: You provide access credentials, mark editable parts of your HTML in a markup, and then edit the content through the hosted CMS. I know two systems which work like that: Cushy CMS and Surreal CMS.

    If the source of your site is versioned through Git (and hosted on GitHub), you have other options, like Netlify CMS, Spinal CMS, Siteleaf, Forestry, or CloudCannon. Some of these also need you to use static site generator (like 11ty, Jekyll, or Hugo).

    If you have some server-side scripting support available (typically PHP) you can also consider some flat-file based, server-side systems, like Kirby CMS or Lektor, which are usually simpler to retrofit into an existing template than “traditional” CMSs (WordPress, Drupal).

    Finally, you could also use a desktop-based static site generator which provides a user-friendly GUI, and then locally generates and uploads the website. For example Publii, YouDoCMS, Agit CMS.

    See more
    WordPress logo

    WordPress

    98.3K
    2.1K
    A semantic personal publishing platform with a focus on aesthetics, web standards, and usability.
    98.3K
    2.1K
    PROS OF WORDPRESS
    • 416
      Customizable
    • 367
      Easy to manage
    • 354
      Plugins & themes
    • 259
      Non-tech colleagues can update website content
    • 247
      Really powerful
    • 145
      Rapid website development
    • 78
      Best documentation
    • 51
      Codex
    • 44
      Product feature set
    • 35
      Custom/internal social network
    • 18
      Open source
    • 8
      Great for all types of websites
    • 7
      Huge install and user base
    • 5
      I like it like I like a kick in the groin
    • 5
      It's simple and easy to use by any novice
    • 5
      Perfect example of user collaboration
    • 5
      Open Source Community
    • 5
      Most websites make use of it
    • 5
      Best
    • 4
      API-based CMS
    • 4
      Community
    • 3
      Easy To use
    • 2
      <a href="https://secure.wphackedhel">Easy Beginner</a>
    CONS OF WORDPRESS
    • 13
      Hard to keep up-to-date if you customize things
    • 13
      Plugins are of mixed quality
    • 10
      Not best backend UI
    • 2
      Complex Organization
    • 1
      Do not cover all the basics in the core
    • 1
      Great Security

    related WordPress posts

    Shared insights
    on
    ElementorElementorWordPressWordPress

    hello guys, I need your help. I created a website, I've been using Elementor forever, but yesterday I bought a template after I made the purchase I knew I made a mistake, cause the template was in HTML, can anyone please show me how to put this HTML template in my WordPress so it will be the face of my website, thank you in advance.

    See more
    Dale Ross
    Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.7M views

    I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

    I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

    Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

    See more
    Gridsome logo

    Gridsome

    161
    51
    Build blazing fast websites for any CMS or data with Vue.js & GraphQL ⚡️💚
    161
    51
    PROS OF GRIDSOME
    • 16
      Vuejs
    • 10
      GraphQL
    • 6
      Starter kit as a base for new project
    • 5
      Reusable components (Vue)
    • 4
      Open source
    • 3
      Allows to use markdown files as articles
    • 3
      Static-sites
    • 2
      Generated websites are super fast
    • 2
      Blogging website
    • 0
      Webpack
    CONS OF GRIDSOME
    • 1
      Open source
    • 1
      Still young

    related Gridsome posts

    Docsify logo

    Docsify

    34
    0
    A documentation site generator without the static html files
    34
    0
    PROS OF DOCSIFY
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF DOCSIFY
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Docsify posts

        Docusaurus logo

        Docusaurus

        240
        35
        Easy to maintain open source documentation websites
        240
        35
        PROS OF DOCUSAURUS
        • 8
          Open Source
        • 7
          Self Hosted
        • 3
          Free to use
        • 3
          React
        • 3
          Easy customization
        • 3
          Jamstack
        • 3
          MDX
        • 3
          I18n
        • 2
          Versioning
        CONS OF DOCUSAURUS
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Docusaurus posts

          Salina Acharya
          Senior Software Engineer at Datamine Software · | 6 upvotes · 165.2K views
          Shared insights
          on
          jsdocjsdocDocusaurusDocusaurusReactReact

          Hello, I need to write documentation for my React codebase. I am tossing between Docusaurus and jsdoc. I liked everything about Docusaurus but then it doesn't seem to generate a web file like jsdoc does once the code is commented with the required tags. I was hoping I could get some advice on which tool to go with for my React application.

          See more
          Gitbook logo

          Gitbook

          221
          10
          Document Everything! For you, your users and your team
          221
          10
          PROS OF GITBOOK
          • 6
            Prueba
          • 4
            Integrated high-quality editor
          CONS OF GITBOOK
          • 1
            No longer Git or Open
          • 1
            Just sync with GitHub

          related Gitbook posts