Alternatives to TrueVault logo

Alternatives to TrueVault

Datica, Aptible, Amazon RDS, Amazon Aurora, and Google Cloud SQL are the most popular alternatives and competitors to TrueVault.
3
9
+ 1
0

What is TrueVault and what are its top alternatives?

TrueVault was built to help startups simplify the complexities of HIPAA. TrueVault will save you hundreds of dev hours. Focus on building your software's core functionality, and let TrueVault protect your data at HIPAA-security levels.
TrueVault is a tool in the SQL Database as a Service category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to TrueVault

  • Datica
    Datica

    Cloud tools for healthcare. We provide a HIPAA-compliant Platform as a Service (PaaS), HIPAA-compliant Mobile Backend (BaaS), and HL7 integration services. Focus on building your digital health app, and not on compliance. Think of us as your healthcare-specific DevOps team. ...

  • Aptible
    Aptible

    Aptible is the world’s first application deployment platform built to automate HIPAA compliance for web and mobile technology. Run the applications and databases of your choice. Seamlessly integrate advanced compliance tools with the platform to generate all of the documentation, audit logs, and explanatory materials you need to demonstrate compliance with every aspect of HIPAA. ...

  • Amazon RDS
    Amazon RDS

    Amazon RDS gives you access to the capabilities of a familiar MySQL, Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server database engine. This means that the code, applications, and tools you already use today with your existing databases can be used with Amazon RDS. Amazon RDS automatically patches the database software and backs up your database, storing the backups for a user-defined retention period and enabling point-in-time recovery. You benefit from the flexibility of being able to scale the compute resources or storage capacity associated with your Database Instance (DB Instance) via a single API call. ...

  • Amazon Aurora
    Amazon Aurora

    Amazon Aurora is a MySQL-compatible, relational database engine that combines the speed and availability of high-end commercial databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases. Amazon Aurora provides up to five times better performance than MySQL at a price point one tenth that of a commercial database while delivering similar performance and availability. ...

  • Google Cloud SQL
    Google Cloud SQL

    Run the same relational databases you know with their rich extension collections, configuration flags and developer ecosystem, but without the hassle of self management. ...

  • Azure SQL Database
    Azure SQL Database

    It is the intelligent, scalable, cloud database service that provides the broadest SQL Server engine compatibility and up to a 212% return on investment. It is a database service that can quickly and efficiently scale to meet demand, is automatically highly available, and supports a variety of third party software. ...

  • DigitalOcean Managed Databases
    DigitalOcean Managed Databases

    Build apps and store data in minutes with easy access to one or more databases and sleep better knowing your data is backed up and optimized. ...

  • Azure Database for MySQL
    Azure Database for MySQL

    Azure Database for MySQL provides a managed database service for app development and deployment that allows you to stand up a MySQL database in minutes and scale on the fly – on the cloud you trust most. ...

TrueVault alternatives & related posts

Datica logo

Datica

5
15
4
HIPAA-compliant cloud computing for healthcare
5
15
+ 1
4
PROS OF DATICA
  • 2
    HIPAA compliance
  • 1
    High touch customer service
  • 1
    Innovative platform
CONS OF DATICA
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Datica posts

    Aptible logo

    Aptible

    30
    21
    0
    Secure, compliant cloud deployment for digital health
    30
    21
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF APTIBLE
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF APTIBLE
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Aptible posts

        Amazon RDS logo

        Amazon RDS

        15K
        9.4K
        759
        Set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud.
        15K
        9.4K
        + 1
        759
        PROS OF AMAZON RDS
        • 164
          Reliable failovers
        • 155
          Automated backups
        • 130
          Backed by amazon
        • 92
          Db snapshots
        • 87
          Multi-availability
        • 30
          Control iops, fast restore to point of time
        • 28
          Security
        • 24
          Elastic
        • 20
          Push-button scaling
        • 20
          Automatic software patching
        • 4
          Replication
        • 3
          Reliable
        • 2
          Isolation
        CONS OF AMAZON RDS
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Amazon RDS posts

          Ganesa Vijayakumar
          Full Stack Coder | Technical Lead · | 19 upvotes · 3.2M views

          I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

          I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

          As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

          UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

          Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

          Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

          Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

          Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

          Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

          Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

          Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

          Thanks, Ganesa

          See more
          John Kodumal

          As we've evolved or added additional infrastructure to our stack, we've biased towards managed services. Most new backing stores are Amazon RDS instances now. We do use self-managed PostgreSQL with TimescaleDB for time-series data—this is made HA with the use of Patroni and Consul.

          We also use managed Amazon ElastiCache instances instead of spinning up Amazon EC2 instances to run Redis workloads, as well as shifting to Amazon Kinesis instead of Kafka.

          See more
          Amazon Aurora logo

          Amazon Aurora

          762
          677
          54
          MySQL and PostgreSQL compatible relational database with several times better performance
          762
          677
          + 1
          54
          PROS OF AMAZON AURORA
          • 14
            MySQL compatibility
          • 12
            Better performance
          • 10
            Easy read scalability
          • 8
            Speed
          • 7
            Low latency read replica
          • 2
            High IOPS cost
          • 1
            Good cost performance
          CONS OF AMAZON AURORA
          • 2
            Vendor locking
          • 1
            Rigid schema

          related Amazon Aurora posts

          Julien DeFrance
          Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 2.6M views

          Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

          I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

          For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

          Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

          Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

          Future improvements / technology decisions included:

          Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

          As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

          One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

          See more
          Tim Specht
          ‎Co-Founder and CTO at Dubsmash · | 13 upvotes · 104.5K views

          Over the years we have added a wide variety of different storages to our stack including PostgreSQL (some hosted by Heroku, some by Amazon RDS) for storing relational data, Amazon DynamoDB to store non-relational data like recommendations & user connections, or Redis to hold pre-aggregated data to speed up API endpoints.

          Since we started running Postgres ourselves on RDS instead of only using the managed offerings of Heroku, we've gained additional flexibility in scaling our application while reducing costs at the same time.

          We are also heavily testing Amazon RDS for Aurora in its Postgres-compatible version and will also give the new release of Aurora Serverless a try!

          #SqlDatabaseAsAService #NosqlDatabaseAsAService #Databases #PlatformAsAService

          See more
          Google Cloud SQL logo

          Google Cloud SQL

          523
          547
          46
          Fully managed relational database service for MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server.
          523
          547
          + 1
          46
          PROS OF GOOGLE CLOUD SQL
          • 13
            Fully managed
          • 10
            Backed by Google
          • 10
            SQL
          • 4
            Flexible
          • 3
            Encryption at rest and transit
          • 3
            Automatic Software Patching
          • 3
            Replication across multiple zone by default
          CONS OF GOOGLE CLOUD SQL
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Google Cloud SQL posts

            Suman Adhikari
            Full Stack (Founder) at Peuconomia Int'l Pvt. Ltd. · | 10 upvotes · 24.7K views

            We use Go for the first-off due to our knowledge of it. Second off, it's highly performant and optimized for scalability. We run it using dockerized containers for our backend REST APIs.

            For Frontend, we use React with Next.js at vercel. We use NextJS here mostly due to our need for Server Side Rendering and easier route management.

            For Database, we use MySQL as it is first-off free and always has been in use with us. We use Google Cloud SQL from GCP that manages its storage and versions along with HA.

            All stacks are free to use and get the best juice out of the system. We also use Redis for caching for enterprise-grade apps where data retrieval latency matters the most.

            See more
            Ido Shamun
            at The Elegant Monkeys · | 6 upvotes · 36.9K views

            As far as the backend goes, we first had to decide which database will power most of Daily services. Considering relational databases vs document datbases, we decided that the relational model is a better fit for Daily as we have a lot of connections between the different entities. At the time MySQL was the only service available on Google Cloud SQL so this was out choice. In terms of #backend development Node.js powers most of our services, thanks to its amazing ecosystem there are a lot of modules publicly available to shorten the development time. Go is for the light services which are all about performance and delivering quickly the response, such as our redirector service.

            See more
            Azure SQL Database logo

            Azure SQL Database

            443
            431
            9
            Managed, intelligent SQL in the cloud
            443
            431
            + 1
            9
            PROS OF AZURE SQL DATABASE
            • 4
              Managed
            • 3
              Secure
            • 2
              Scalable
            CONS OF AZURE SQL DATABASE
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Azure SQL Database posts

              DigitalOcean Managed Databases logo

              DigitalOcean Managed Databases

              52
              59
              0
              Fully hosted and managed database engines for your applications, so you can focus on building, not patching
              52
              59
              + 1
              0
              PROS OF DIGITALOCEAN MANAGED DATABASES
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF DIGITALOCEAN MANAGED DATABASES
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related DigitalOcean Managed Databases posts

                  Azure Database for MySQL logo

                  Azure Database for MySQL

                  42
                  93
                  0
                  Managed MySQL database service for app developers
                  42
                  93
                  + 1
                  0
                  PROS OF AZURE DATABASE FOR MYSQL
                    Be the first to leave a pro
                    CONS OF AZURE DATABASE FOR MYSQL
                      Be the first to leave a con

                      related Azure Database for MySQL posts