Alternatives to Swagger UI logo

Alternatives to Swagger UI

Postman, jsdoc, Apiary, Gitbook, and Docusaurus are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Swagger UI.
2K
1.6K
+ 1
205

What is Swagger UI and what are its top alternatives?

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API
Swagger UI is a tool in the Documentation as a Service & Tools category of a tech stack.
Swagger UI is an open source tool with 23.3K GitHub stars and 8.6K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Swagger UI's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Swagger UI

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • jsdoc
    jsdoc

    JSDoc 3 is an API documentation generator for JavaScript, similar to JavaDoc or PHPDoc. You add documentation comments directly to your source code, right along side the code itself. The JSDoc Tool will scan your source code, and generate a complete HTML documentation website for you. ...

  • Apiary
    Apiary

    It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves. ...

  • Gitbook
    Gitbook

    It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team. ...

  • Docusaurus
    Docusaurus

    Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites. ...

  • ReadMe.io
    ReadMe.io

    It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more. ...

  • Read the Docs
    Read the Docs

    It hosts documentation, making it fully searchable and easy to find. You can import your docs using any major version control system, including Mercurial, Git, Subversion, and Bazaar. ...

  • zeroheight
    zeroheight

    Document your design system, together. Create beautiful living styleguides and document all your design system resources in one place. ...

Swagger UI alternatives & related posts

Postman logo

Postman

82K
69.2K
1.8K
Only complete API development environment
82K
69.2K
+ 1
1.8K
PROS OF POSTMAN
  • 488
    Easy to use
  • 368
    Great tool
  • 275
    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
  • 155
    Easy setup, looks good
  • 143
    The best api workflow out there
  • 53
    History feature
  • 53
    It's the best
  • 44
    Adds real value to my workflow
  • 42
    Great interface that magically predicts your needs
  • 34
    The best in class app
  • 11
    Can save and share script
  • 9
    Fully featured without looking cluttered
  • 7
    Collections
  • 7
    Option to run scrips
  • 7
    Global/Environment Variables
  • 6
    Dead simple and useful. Excellent
  • 6
    Shareable Collections
  • 6
    Dark theme easy on the eyes
  • 5
    Awesome customer support
  • 5
    Great integration with newman
  • 4
    Simple
  • 4
    The test script is useful
  • 4
    Documentation
  • 3
    Easy as pie
  • 3
    Saves responses
  • 3
    Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
  • 3
    This has simplified my testing significantly
  • 2
    API-network
  • 2
    I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
  • 2
    Mocking API calls with predefined response
  • 1
    Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
  • 1
    Graph
  • 1
    Postman Runner CI Integration
  • 1
    Now supports GraphQL
  • 1
    Continuous integration using newman
  • 1
    Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
  • 0
    <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
  • 0
    Runner
CONS OF POSTMAN
  • 9
    Bloated features and UI
  • 9
    Stores credentials in HTTP
  • 8
    Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
  • 7
    Poor GraphQL support
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 3
    Can't prompt for per-request variables
  • 3
    Not free after 5 users
  • 1
    Import curl
  • 1
    Import swagger
  • 1
    Support websocket

related Postman posts

Noah Zoschke
Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 2.4M views

We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

See more
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 26 upvotes · 3.3M views

Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

  • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
  • npm as package manager
  • NestJS as Node.js framework
  • TypeScript as programming language
  • ExpressJS as web server
  • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
  • Postman as a tool for API development
  • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
  • JSON Web Token for access token management

The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

  • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
  • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
  • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
  • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
See more
jsdoc logo

jsdoc

272
146
5
An API documentation generator for JavaScript
272
146
+ 1
5
PROS OF JSDOC
  • 2
    Far less verbose
  • 1
    Simpler type safe than TypeScript
  • 1
    No compiler needed
  • 1
    Does almost everything TS does
CONS OF JSDOC
    Be the first to leave a con

    related jsdoc posts

    Salina Acharya
    Senior Software Engineer at Datamine Software · | 5 upvotes · 9.2K views
    Shared insights
    on
    jsdocjsdocDocusaurusDocusaurusReactReact

    Hello, I need to write documentation for my React codebase. I am tossing between Docusaurus and jsdoc. I liked everything about Docusaurus but then it doesn't seem to generate a web file like jsdoc does once the code is commented with the required tags. I was hoping I could get some advice on which tool to go with for my React application.

    See more
    Apiary logo

    Apiary

    226
    311
    109
    Integrated API documentation, prototyping and testing
    226
    311
    + 1
    109
    PROS OF APIARY
    • 29
      Easy to use
    • 19
      Free to use
    • 12
      Traffic inspector
    • 11
      Free
    • 10
      Collaboration
    • 7
      Mock API
    • 4
      Dashboard
    • 3
      Customization
    • 2
      30 Days Trial
    • 2
      Access Control
    • 2
      Documentation
    • 2
      Validate API Documentation
    • 1
      API explorer
    • 1
      Clean syntax
    • 1
      Provisioning
    • 1
      Shared API blueprint templates
    • 1
      Github integration helps with collaboration
    • 1
      Code auto-generation
    CONS OF APIARY
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Apiary posts

      Gitbook logo

      Gitbook

      191
      317
      7
      Document Everything! For you, your users and your team
      191
      317
      + 1
      7
      PROS OF GITBOOK
      • 5
        Prueba
      • 2
        Integrated high-quality editor
      CONS OF GITBOOK
      • 1
        No longer Git or Open
      • 1
        Just sync with GitHub

      related Gitbook posts

      Docusaurus logo

      Docusaurus

      146
      372
      33
      Easy to maintain open source documentation websites
      146
      372
      + 1
      33
      PROS OF DOCUSAURUS
      • 7
        Self Hosted
      • 7
        Open Source
      • 3
        MDX
      • 3
        Free to use
      • 3
        Easy customization
      • 3
        Jamstack
      • 3
        React
      • 2
        I18n
      • 2
        Versioning
      CONS OF DOCUSAURUS
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Docusaurus posts

        Salina Acharya
        Senior Software Engineer at Datamine Software · | 5 upvotes · 9.2K views
        Shared insights
        on
        jsdocjsdocDocusaurusDocusaurusReactReact

        Hello, I need to write documentation for my React codebase. I am tossing between Docusaurus and jsdoc. I liked everything about Docusaurus but then it doesn't seem to generate a web file like jsdoc does once the code is commented with the required tags. I was hoping I could get some advice on which tool to go with for my React application.

        See more
        ReadMe.io logo

        ReadMe.io

        116
        346
        69
        Create and manage beautiful, interactive documentation the easy way
        116
        346
        + 1
        69
        PROS OF README.IO
        • 18
          Great UI
        • 15
          Easy
        • 10
          Customizable
        • 10
          Cute mascot
        • 8
          Looks great and is fun to use
        • 5
          It's friggin awesome
        • 3
          Make sample API calls inside the docs
        CONS OF README.IO
        • 4
          Support is awful
        • 3
          No backup and restore capability
        • 2
          Important parts of the CSS are locked
        • 2
          Document structure is severely restricted
        • 2
          Full of bugs
        • 2
          No notifications of edits by other users
        • 1
          Supports only two documents plus a blog
        • 1
          Does not support pre-request scripts
        • 1
          Random pages display content of other pages instead
        • 1
          Review and comment functionality is hard to work with
        • 1
          Navigation in user-facing copy is spotty
        • 1
          All admins have full editing rights

        related ReadMe.io posts

        Noah Zoschke
        Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 2.4M views

        We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

        Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

        Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

        This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

        Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

        Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

        Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

        See more
        Todd Gardner

        We recently needed to rebuild our documentation site, currently built using Jekyll hosted on GitHub Pages. We wanted to update the content and refresh the style to make it easier to find answers.

        We considered hosted services that could accept our markdown content, like ReadMe.io and Read the Docs, however both seemed expensive for essentially hosting the same platform we already had for free.

        I also looked at the Gatsby Static Site generator to modernize Jekyll. I don't think this is a fit, as our documentation is relatively simple and relies heavily on Markdown. Jekyll excels at Markdown, while Gatsby seemed to struggle with it.

        We chose to stick with the current platform and just refresh our template and style with some add-on JavaScript.

        See more
        Read the Docs logo

        Read the Docs

        64
        269
        22
        Create, host, and browse documentation
        64
        269
        + 1
        22
        PROS OF READ THE DOCS
        • 13
          GitHub integration
        • 7
          Free for public repos
        • 2
          Automated Builds
        CONS OF READ THE DOCS
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Read the Docs posts

          Todd Gardner

          We recently needed to rebuild our documentation site, currently built using Jekyll hosted on GitHub Pages. We wanted to update the content and refresh the style to make it easier to find answers.

          We considered hosted services that could accept our markdown content, like ReadMe.io and Read the Docs, however both seemed expensive for essentially hosting the same platform we already had for free.

          I also looked at the Gatsby Static Site generator to modernize Jekyll. I don't think this is a fit, as our documentation is relatively simple and relies heavily on Markdown. Jekyll excels at Markdown, while Gatsby seemed to struggle with it.

          We chose to stick with the current platform and just refresh our template and style with some add-on JavaScript.

          See more
          zeroheight logo

          zeroheight

          45
          95
          0
          UX design docs that stay up-to-date
          45
          95
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF ZEROHEIGHT
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF ZEROHEIGHT
              Be the first to leave a con

              related zeroheight posts