Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Wiki.js

54
139
+ 1
2
XWiki

16
28
+ 1
0
Add tool

Wiki.js vs XWiki: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Wiki.js and XWiki.

  1. Installation and Set up: Wiki.js provides a straightforward installation process that can be done via Docker, Node.js, or manual deployment, making it easy to get started. On the other hand, XWiki requires Java to be installed and set up, which may be more complex for non-technical users.

  2. User Interface: Wiki.js offers a modern and user-friendly interface with a focus on simplicity and ease of use. It provides a clean and intuitive user experience, making it ideal for users who are new to wiki software. XWiki, on the other hand, has a more complex interface with a steep learning curve. It offers advanced customization options but may be overwhelming for beginners.

  3. Page Editing and Formatting: Wiki.js provides a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editor that allows users to create and edit pages with ease. It supports Markdown and HTML formatting, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users. XWiki uses a more traditional wiki markup language, which may be more familiar to users who have previous experience with wiki software.

  4. Extensibility and Customization: Wiki.js offers a plugin system that allows users to extend its functionality and customize their wiki according to their specific needs. It provides a wide range of plugins and themes, making it easy to tailor the wiki to suit different use cases. XWiki also offers extensibility through its plugin system, but it may require more technical expertise to develop and integrate custom plugins.

  5. Access Control and Permissions: Wiki.js provides a robust access control system that allows administrators to manage user roles, permissions, and restrictions. It offers fine-grained control over who can view, edit, and delete content, ensuring that sensitive information is protected. XWiki also offers access control features, but it may not have the same level of granularity and customization options as Wiki.js.

  6. Collaboration and Integration: Wiki.js provides built-in collaboration features, such as real-time editing and commenting, that allow multiple users to work on a document simultaneously. It also supports integration with popular tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams, making it easy to collaborate and share information. XWiki also supports collaboration but may not have the same level of real-time editing capabilities and integrations as Wiki.js.

In summary, Wiki.js offers a user-friendly interface, easy installation, and a WYSIWYG editor with Markdown support. It also provides extensive customization options and robust access control features. XWiki, on the other hand, may be more suitable for users who prefer a more customizable interface and have previous experience with wiki markup.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Wiki.js
Pros of XWiki
  • 1
    Fast speed by node.js
  • 1
    Open Source
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Wiki.js
    Cons of XWiki
    • 1
      No tree structure by default
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Wiki.js?

      It is an open source, modern and powerful wiki app based on Node.js, Git, and Markdown. It runs on the flamingly fast Node.js engine and is optimized to conserve CPU resources.

      What is XWiki?

      It is a free wiki software platform written in Java with a design emphasis on extensibility. It is an enterprise wiki. It includes WYSIWYG editing, OpenDocument based document import/export, semantic annotations and tagging, and advanced permissions management.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Wiki.js?
      What companies use XWiki?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Wiki.js or XWiki.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Wiki.js?
      What tools integrate with XWiki?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Wiki.js and XWiki?
      DokuWiki
      It is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database. It has clean and readable syntax. The ease of maintenance, backup and integration makes it an administrator's favorite. Built in access controls and authentication connectors make it especially useful in the enterprise context and the large number of plugins contributed by its vibrant community allow for a broad range of use cases beyond a traditional wiki.
      MediaWiki
      It is a free server-based software. It is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation that uses PHP to process and display data stored in a database, such as MySQL.
      Confluence
      Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.
      Gitbook
      It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team.
      MkDocs
      It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.
      See all alternatives