StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Customer Support
  4. Knowledge Management
  5. Wiki.js vs XWiki

Wiki.js vs XWiki

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

XWiki
XWiki
Stacks18
Followers30
Votes0
Wiki.js
Wiki.js
Stacks56
Followers143
Votes2
GitHub Stars27.3K
Forks3.1K

Wiki.js vs XWiki: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Wiki.js and XWiki.

  1. Installation and Set up: Wiki.js provides a straightforward installation process that can be done via Docker, Node.js, or manual deployment, making it easy to get started. On the other hand, XWiki requires Java to be installed and set up, which may be more complex for non-technical users.

  2. User Interface: Wiki.js offers a modern and user-friendly interface with a focus on simplicity and ease of use. It provides a clean and intuitive user experience, making it ideal for users who are new to wiki software. XWiki, on the other hand, has a more complex interface with a steep learning curve. It offers advanced customization options but may be overwhelming for beginners.

  3. Page Editing and Formatting: Wiki.js provides a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editor that allows users to create and edit pages with ease. It supports Markdown and HTML formatting, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users. XWiki uses a more traditional wiki markup language, which may be more familiar to users who have previous experience with wiki software.

  4. Extensibility and Customization: Wiki.js offers a plugin system that allows users to extend its functionality and customize their wiki according to their specific needs. It provides a wide range of plugins and themes, making it easy to tailor the wiki to suit different use cases. XWiki also offers extensibility through its plugin system, but it may require more technical expertise to develop and integrate custom plugins.

  5. Access Control and Permissions: Wiki.js provides a robust access control system that allows administrators to manage user roles, permissions, and restrictions. It offers fine-grained control over who can view, edit, and delete content, ensuring that sensitive information is protected. XWiki also offers access control features, but it may not have the same level of granularity and customization options as Wiki.js.

  6. Collaboration and Integration: Wiki.js provides built-in collaboration features, such as real-time editing and commenting, that allow multiple users to work on a document simultaneously. It also supports integration with popular tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams, making it easy to collaborate and share information. XWiki also supports collaboration but may not have the same level of real-time editing capabilities and integrations as Wiki.js.

In summary, Wiki.js offers a user-friendly interface, easy installation, and a WYSIWYG editor with Markdown support. It also provides extensive customization options and robust access control features. XWiki, on the other hand, may be more suitable for users who prefer a more customizable interface and have previous experience with wiki markup.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on XWiki, Wiki.js

Michael
Michael

Software Engineer

May 20, 2020

Needs adviceonConfluenceConfluenceGoogle DocsGoogle Docs

Hello community, I am looking for a self-hosted online document management solution. One that covers all my needs is Confluence but it is currently not affordable for my team. Key requirements are RTL support, WYSIWYG Editing (Word-like interface as much as possible), Concurrent Editing (the best experience I have with Google Docs where I can even see who else is currently editing a document) with conflict resolution, versioning (view history and switch between versions), PDF and Word export, complex tables, and some others, full list here in column "A". I found XWIKI covering all my requirements (including those "bonus features" that I didn't list here) except one - RTL. Here a hack is suggested to address this issues but I would prefer not to go with any hacks. I myself am ready to contribute to an open source development but other people who (hopefully) will use this tool are not software engineers and this fact must be kept in mind... Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!

62.1k views62.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

XWiki
XWiki
Wiki.js
Wiki.js

It is a free wiki software platform written in Java with a design emphasis on extensibility. It is an enterprise wiki. It includes WYSIWYG editing, OpenDocument based document import/export, semantic annotations and tagging, and advanced permissions management.

It is an open source, modern and powerful wiki app based on Node.js, Git, and Markdown. It runs on the flamingly fast Node.js engine and is optimized to conserve CPU resources.

Wiki; Extensions; Programming; Internationalization; Scalable; Clustering; Database; Performance; Office import; Scripting; Polyglot; Annotations; Sstructured data
Page permissions; Authentication backends; Host blocking
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
27.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.1K
Stacks
18
Stacks
56
Followers
30
Followers
143
Votes
0
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Fast speed by node.js
  • 1
    Open Source
Cons
  • 2
    No tree structure by default
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Zapier
Zapier
JSFiddle
JSFiddle
Figma
Figma
G Suite
G Suite
CodePen
CodePen
Markdown
Markdown
Git
Git
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to XWiki, Wiki.js?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Swagger UI

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Apiary

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

ReadMe.io

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Read the Docs

Read the Docs

It hosts documentation, making it fully searchable and easy to find. You can import your docs using any major version control system, including Mercurial, Git, Subversion, and Bazaar.

Gelato.io

Gelato.io

Gelato.io is a SaaS tool for creating API documentation and developer portals.

MireDot

MireDot

Generate REST documentation directly from your Java source code. This ensures always up-to-date and accurate documentation with minimal effort.

Slite

Slite

Slite is the easiest way for teams to write together. From meeting notes, handbooks, guides, specifications to anything your team needs written down and retrievable in just a few clicks.

Gitbook

Gitbook

It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope