StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Apache Spark vs Spark Framework

Apache Spark vs Spark Framework

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Stacks3.1K
Followers3.5K
Votes140
GitHub Stars42.2K
Forks28.9K
Spark Framework
Spark Framework
Stacks39
Followers91
Votes7
GitHub Stars9.7K
Forks1.6K

Apache Spark vs Spark Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Spark and Spark Framework are both widely used technologies in the field of data processing and web development, respectively. While they share similar names, they serve different purposes and have distinct features. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Apache Spark and Spark Framework.

  1. Data Processing vs. Web Development: The primary difference between Apache Spark and Spark Framework lies in their domain of application. Apache Spark is a powerful data processing engine that enables large-scale data processing tasks, such as data analytics, machine learning, and stream processing. On the other hand, Spark Framework is a lightweight Java web framework that simplifies the development of web applications, RESTful APIs, and microservices.

  2. Big Data Processing vs. HTTP-based Applications: Apache Spark is designed to handle big data processing tasks efficiently by leveraging distributed computing techniques. It provides built-in support for parallel processing, fault tolerance, and data caching. In contrast, Spark Framework focuses on building HTTP-based applications by providing an easy-to-use API for routing HTTP requests, handling request/response objects, and implementing middleware.

  3. Complexity and Scalability: Apache Spark is a highly scalable and complex framework that is optimized for processing large volumes of data across distributed clusters. It leverages in-memory computing and optimization techniques to achieve high performance. On the other hand, Spark Framework is a lightweight framework that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It can be used for building small to medium-sized web applications that do not require the scale and complexity of Apache Spark.

  4. Support for Data Analytics vs. Web Services: Apache Spark provides a rich set of libraries and APIs for data analytics tasks, including machine learning (MLlib), graph processing (GraphX), and stream processing (Spark Streaming). It supports a wide range of data sources and provides advanced data manipulation capabilities. In contrast, Spark Framework is primarily focused on building web services and does not provide built-in support for data analytics. However, it can be integrated with other data processing tools and frameworks.

  5. Programming Language Support: Apache Spark supports multiple programming languages, including Java, Scala, Python, and R. It allows developers to write data processing jobs in their preferred language and provides language-specific APIs and libraries. Spark Framework, on the other hand, is primarily built using Java and provides a Java-based API for building web applications. However, it also has limited support for other JVM-based languages like Kotlin and Groovy.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Apache Spark has a large and active community of developers and users. It is widely adopted in industry and academia and has a rich ecosystem of third-party libraries, tools, and integrations. Spark Framework, although less popular than Apache Spark, also has an active community and provides a range of plugins and extensions for common web development tasks. However, its community and ecosystem are relatively smaller compared to Apache Spark.

In summary, Apache Spark is a powerful and scalable data processing engine for big data analytics, while Spark Framework is a lightweight web framework for building HTTP-based applications. These technologies differ in their domain of application, complexity, scalability, language support, and community/ecosystem size.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Spark, Spark Framework

Nilesh
Nilesh

Technical Architect at Self Employed

Jul 8, 2020

Needs adviceonElasticsearchElasticsearchKafkaKafka

We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.

In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.

In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.

576k views576k
Comments
Juan José
Juan José

May 1, 2020

Decided

I developed Hexagon heavily inspired in these great tools because of the following reasons:

  • Take full advantage of the Kotlin programming language without any strings attached to Java (as a language).
  • I wanted to be able to replace the HTTP server library used with different adapters (Jetty, Netty, etc.) and though right now there is only one, more are coming.
  • Have a complete tool to do full applications, though you can use other libraries, Hexagon comes with a dependency injection helper, settings loading from different sources and HTTP Client, so it comes with (batteries included).

Right now I'm using it for my pet projects, and I'm happy with it.

35.9k views35.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Spark Framework
Spark Framework

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

It is a simple and expressive Java/Kotlin web framework DSL built for rapid development. Its intention is to provide an alternative for Kotlin/Java developers that want to develop their web applications as expressive as possible and with minimal boilerplate.

Run programs up to 100x faster than Hadoop MapReduce in memory, or 10x faster on disk;Write applications quickly in Java, Scala or Python;Combine SQL, streaming, and complex analytics;Spark runs on Hadoop, Mesos, standalone, or in the cloud. It can access diverse data sources including HDFS, Cassandra, HBase, S3
Built for productivity; Lets you take full advantage of the JVM
Statistics
GitHub Stars
42.2K
GitHub Stars
9.7K
GitHub Forks
28.9K
GitHub Forks
1.6K
Stacks
3.1K
Stacks
39
Followers
3.5K
Followers
91
Votes
140
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 61
    Open-source
  • 48
    Fast and Flexible
  • 8
    One platform for every big data problem
  • 8
    Great for distributed SQL like applications
  • 6
    Easy to install and to use
Cons
  • 4
    Speed
Pros
  • 2
    Very easy to get up and running. Lovely API
  • 1
    Native paralelization
  • 1
    Ideal for microservices
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Fast
Integrations
No integrations available
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Apache Spark, Spark Framework?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase