StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. SonarQube vs Veracode

SonarQube vs Veracode

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SonarQube
SonarQube
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.0K
Votes53
GitHub Stars10.0K
Forks2.1K
Veracode
Veracode
Stacks66
Followers129
Votes0

SonarQube vs Veracode: What are the differences?

SonarQube and Veracode are two popular tools used for code analysis and security testing in software development. Let's explore the key differences between SonarQube and Veracode

  1. Integration with Development Process: SonarQube can be easily integrated into the Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipeline, allowing developers to automate code analysis and track the quality of their code at every stage. On the other hand, Veracode provides support for various development environments, including IDE plugins, to seamlessly integrate security testing into the development process.

  2. Scope of Testing: SonarQube primarily focuses on providing a wide range of code quality and maintainability analysis features. It checks for coding standards, potential bugs, code smells, and duplication. Veracode, in contrast, specializes in application security testing, focusing on identifying security vulnerabilities and providing detailed reports on potential threats.

  3. Testing Approach: SonarQube mainly relies on static code analysis, which analyzes the source code without executing it. It can detect vulnerabilities, quality issues, and code smells by inspecting the code directly. Veracode, on the other hand, combines static analysis with dynamic analysis. It not only analyzes the code but also performs black-box testing by executing the application and analyzing its behavior in a real or simulated environment.

  4. Deployment Options: SonarQube is an open-source tool that can be self-hosted on-premise or deployed on the cloud. It provides greater flexibility for organizations to set up and customize the tool according to their requirements. Veracode, however, is a cloud-based platform that offers security-as-a-service. It provides a centralized and scalable solution for conducting security assessments without requiring any infrastructure setup.

  5. Types of Assessments: SonarQube primarily focuses on code quality assessments, including code complexity, maintainability, reliability, and security vulnerability detection. It offers limited support for security assessments and does not provide detailed reports on specific security vulnerabilities. Veracode, on the other hand, specializes in security assessments, including vulnerability scanning, penetration testing, and providing comprehensive reports on different types of security flaws.

  6. Automated Remediation: SonarQube provides detailed feedback to developers about code issues along with recommended fixes. It supports automated code refactoring and suggests code changes to improve quality. Veracode offers guidance on fixing identified security vulnerabilities but does not provide extensive code quality improvement suggestions or automated code refactoring capabilities.

In summary, SonarQube primarily focuses on code quality assessment and integration with the development process, while Veracode specializes in application security testing, combining static and dynamic analysis. SonarQube is an open-source solution that can be self-hosted, whereas Veracode is a cloud-based security-as-a-service platform.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube
SonarQube
Veracode
Veracode

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

It seamlessly integrates application security into the software lifecycle, effectively eliminating vulnerabilities during the lowest-cost point in the development/deployment chain, and blocking threats while in production.

Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
Statice Application Security Scanning; Dynamic Application Security Scanning
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
66
Followers
2.0K
Followers
129
Votes
53
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 2
    Difficult to deploy
Cons
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity
Appveyor
Appveyor
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Bamboo
Bamboo
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Appveyor
Appveyor

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, Veracode?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana