StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Sinatra vs Slim

Sinatra vs Slim

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sinatra
Sinatra
Stacks1.1K
Followers502
Votes212
GitHub Stars12.4K
Forks2.1K
Slim
Slim
Stacks273
Followers391
Votes152
GitHub Stars12.2K
Forks2.0K

Sinatra vs Slim: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to web application development, both Sinatra and Slim are popular choices. Sinatra is a lightweight web application library that's easy to learn and use, while Slim is a template engine that simplifies writing HTML code.

  1. Routing System: One key difference between Sinatra and Slim is that Sinatra provides a robust routing system for defining endpoints and handling requests. It allows developers to create custom routes easily, making it ideal for building APIs and web applications with specific endpoint requirements.

  2. Templating Language: Slim, on the other hand, focuses on providing a clean and concise templating language for generating HTML. It uses indentation and simple syntax to control the structure of the HTML output, making it more streamlined and readable compared to traditional HTML or other template engines.

  3. Middleware Support: Sinatra offers extensive support for middleware, which are components that can intercept requests and responses. This allows developers to add additional functionality, such as logging, authentication, or caching, to their web applications without cluttering the main application logic.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Sinatra has a larger and more established community compared to Slim, which means there are more resources, tutorials, and plugins available for developers. This can be beneficial when seeking help or looking for solutions to common problems during the development process.

  5. Extensibility: While both Sinatra and Slim can be extended through plugins and extensions, Sinatra's modular design and flexible architecture make it easier to customize and extend functionality. Developers can choose from a wide range of existing plugins or create their own to tailor Sinatra to their specific needs.

  6. Performance: Due to its minimalistic design and focus on simplicity, Slim tends to be more lightweight and often outperforms Sinatra in terms of rendering speed and efficiency. This can be advantageous for projects where performance is a critical factor.

Summary

In Summary, Sinatra excels in providing a robust routing system and extensive middleware support, while Slim shines with its clean templating language and superior performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sinatra
Sinatra
Slim
Slim

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.4K
GitHub Stars
12.2K
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
1.1K
Stacks
273
Followers
502
Followers
391
Votes
212
Votes
152
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 65
    Lightweight
  • 50
    Simple
  • 35
    Open source
  • 20
    Ruby
  • 13
    Great ecosystem of tools
Pros
  • 33
    Microframework
  • 27
    API
  • 22
    Open source
  • 21
    Php
  • 11
    Fast
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
Padrino
Padrino
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Sinatra, Slim?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Flask

Flask

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase