Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
SignalR vs Telepat: What are the differences?
Developers describe SignalR as "A new library for ASP.NET developers that makes developing real-time web functionality easy". SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization. On the other hand, Telepat is detailed as "Real time data synchronization platform for modern API driven web&mobile apps". Telepat is an open-source backend stack, designed to deliver information and information updates in real-time to clients, while allowing for flexible deployment and simple scaling.
SignalR and Telepat can be categorized as "Realtime Backend / API" tools.
SignalR and Telepat are both open source tools. SignalR with 7.75K GitHub stars and 2.19K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Telepat with 340 GitHub stars and 20 GitHub forks.
Pros of SignalR
- Supports .NET server32
- Real-time25
- Free18
- Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling16
- WebSockets15
- Simple10
- Open source9
- Ease of use8
- JSON8
- Cool5
- Azure0
Pros of Telepat
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of SignalR
- Expertise hard to get2
- Requires jQuery2
- Weak iOS and Android support1
- Big differences between ASP.NET and Core versions1