Semantic UI vs TypeScript

Overview

Semantic UI

Stacks992

Followers1.5K

Votes673

GitHub Stars51.2K

Forks4.9K

TypeScript

Stacks105.1K

Followers74.2K

Votes503

GitHub Stars106.6K

Forks13.1K

Semantic UI vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Component Library vs. Programming Language: Semantic UI is a component library that provides pre-designed UI components and CSS frameworks for building websites, while TypeScript is a programming language that adds static type-checking capabilities to JavaScript.
Styling vs. Type System: Semantic UI focuses on styling and design consistency, providing ready-to-use components with defined styles, whereas TypeScript focuses on enhancing JavaScript with a strong type system to catch errors and improve code quality.
Front-end vs. Back-end: Semantic UI is primarily used for front-end development to create visually appealing interfaces, while TypeScript is used for both front-end and back-end development, allowing developers to write type-safe code for the entire application stack.
HTML/CSS vs. JavaScript Superset: Semantic UI allows developers to use HTML and CSS to build UI components, with additional functionalities added through jQuery, while TypeScript acts as a superset of JavaScript, adding static types and modern ECMAScript features to the language.
Ease of Use vs. Type Safety: Semantic UI simplifies the process of building UI with pre-built components and responsive grid systems, focusing on ease of use for designers and developers, whereas TypeScript prioritizes type safety and error prevention, helping developers write more robust and maintainable code.
Community and Ecosystem: Semantic UI has a strong community support and a wide range of ready-made themes and plugins to choose from, while TypeScript benefits from the vast TypeScript ecosystem, including a rich set of type definitions for popular libraries and frameworks, enhancing developer productivity and code quality.

In Summary, Semantic UI focuses on providing ready-to-use design components for front-end development, while TypeScript enhances JavaScript with static typing and modern features for building robust applications across the stack.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Semantic UI, TypeScript

Peter

May 17, 2019

Reviewon

TypeScript

I use TypeScript because:

incredible developer tooling and community support
actively developed and supported by Microsoft (yes, I like Microsoft) ;)
easier to make sense of a TS codebase because the annotations provide so much more context than plain JS
refactors become easier (VSCode has superb support for TS)

I've switched back and forth between TS and Flow and decided a year ago to abandon Flow completely in favor of TS. I don't want to bash Flow, however, my main grievances are very poor tooling (editor integration leaves much to be desired), a slower release cycle, and subpar docs and community support.

135k views135k

Comments

Jarvis

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

TypeScript

Flow (JS)

I use TypeScript because it isn't just about validating the types I'm expecting to receive though that is a huge part of it too. Flow (JS) seems to be a type system only. TypeScript also allows you to use the latest features of JavaScript while also providing the type checking. To be fair to Flow (JS), I have not used it, but likely wouldn't have due to the additional features I get from TypeScript.

168k views168k

Comments

David

VP Engineering at Trolley

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

JavaScript

Flow (JS)

TypeScript

We originally (in 2017) started rewriting our platform from JavaScript to Flow (JS) but found the library support for Flow was lacking. After switching gears to TypeScript we've never looked back. At this point we're finding that frontend and backend libraries are supporting TypeScript out of the box and where the support is missing that the commuity is typically got a solution in hand.

173k views173k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI	TypeScript
Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.	TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.
Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 51.2K	GitHub Stars 106.6K
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks 13.1K
Stacks 992	Stacks 105.1K
Followers 1.5K	Followers 74.2K
Votes 673	Votes 503
Pros & Cons
Pros 157 Easy to use and looks elegant 92 Variety of components 64 Themes 61 Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use 57 Semantic, duh Cons 5 Outdated build tool (gulp 3)) 3 HTML is not semantic (see list component) 3 Poor accessibility support 2 Javascript is tied to jquery	Pros 173 More intuitive and type safe javascript 105 Type safe 80 JavaScript superset 48 The best AltJS ever 27 Best AltJS for BackEnd Cons 5 Code may look heavy and confusing 4 Hype
Integrations
AngularJS React Ember.js Meteor	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI, TypeScript?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Related Comparisons

Semantic UI vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Component Library vs. Programming Language: Semantic UI is a component library that provides pre-designed UI components and CSS frameworks for building websites, while TypeScript is a programming language that adds static type-checking capabilities to JavaScript.
Styling vs. Type System: Semantic UI focuses on styling and design consistency, providing ready-to-use components with defined styles, whereas TypeScript focuses on enhancing JavaScript with a strong type system to catch errors and improve code quality.
Front-end vs. Back-end: Semantic UI is primarily used for front-end development to create visually appealing interfaces, while TypeScript is used for both front-end and back-end development, allowing developers to write type-safe code for the entire application stack.
HTML/CSS vs. JavaScript Superset: Semantic UI allows developers to use HTML and CSS to build UI components, with additional functionalities added through jQuery, while TypeScript acts as a superset of JavaScript, adding static types and modern ECMAScript features to the language.
Ease of Use vs. Type Safety: Semantic UI simplifies the process of building UI with pre-built components and responsive grid systems, focusing on ease of use for designers and developers, whereas TypeScript prioritizes type safety and error prevention, helping developers write more robust and maintainable code.
Community and Ecosystem: Semantic UI has a strong community support and a wide range of ready-made themes and plugins to choose from, while TypeScript benefits from the vast TypeScript ecosystem, including a rich set of type definitions for popular libraries and frameworks, enhancing developer productivity and code quality.

Semantic UI vs TypeScript

Overview