Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sass Lint vs scss-lint: What are the differences?
Sass Lint and scss-lint are both tools used for linting and analyzing Sass code, but they have some key differences that set them apart.
Configurability: Sass Lint allows for more extensive configuration options compared to scss-lint. With Sass Lint, developers have the flexibility to customize the linting rules according to their specific project requirements, enabling them to enforce coding standards and best practices more effectively. On the other hand, scss-lint offers a more out-of-the-box approach with a predefined set of rules, making it simpler to set up and use.
Rule Set: Sass Lint has a larger rule set compared to scss-lint. This means that Sass Lint covers a wider range of potential code issues and can provide more comprehensive linting feedback. scss-lint, while still effective, has a more limited set of rules, potentially allowing some code issues to go undetected.
Supported Platforms: Sass Lint is a JavaScript-based tool and can be used with any JavaScript-enabled platform. This makes it compatible with various build systems and editors, providing flexibility in the development environment. On the other hand, scss-lint is specifically designed for Ruby projects and relies on a Ruby-based ecosystem. This restricts its usage to Ruby-based projects and may require additional setup and configuration for other platforms.
Development Status: Sass Lint is actively maintained and has regular updates, ensuring compatibility with the latest Sass features and providing ongoing bug fixes. In contrast, scss-lint has seen fewer updates and may not be as actively maintained, potentially leading to compatibility issues with newer Sass versions and lacking the latest bug fixes.
Community Support: Sass Lint has a larger and more active community compared to scss-lint. This means that developers using Sass Lint have access to a broader range of resources, such as documentation, tutorials, and third-party integrations. The larger community also ensures a more vibrant ecosystem with more contributions and support available.
Integration: Sass Lint integrates well with other linting tools and build systems. It can be seamlessly integrated into existing workflows and build processes, ensuring consistent code quality across the development pipeline. On the other hand, scss-lint may require more manual configuration and setup to integrate with other tools and systems, potentially leading to additional overhead and complexity.
In Summary, while both Sass Lint and scss-lint serve the purpose of linting Sass code, Sass Lint offers more configurability, a larger rule set, better platform compatibility, active development, a larger community, and smoother integration with other tools.
Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.
It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.
I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.
And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).
Any recommendation is appreciated.
In the case of .js files I would recommend using both Eslint and Prettier.
You can set up Prettier as an Eslint rule using the following plugin:
https://github.com/prettier/eslint-plugin-prettier
And in order to avoid conflicts between Prettier and Eslint, you can use this config:
https://github.com/prettier/eslint-config-prettier
Which turns off all Eslint rules that are unnecessary or might conflict with Prettier.
you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.
while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.
prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.
i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.
for my teams i set it up like this: - eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support - eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it) - vscode workspace config: format on save - separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting - precommit hooks (husky)
so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)
Pura vida! Well, I had a similar issue and at the end I decided to use Stylelint + Prettier for that job, in our case, we wanted that our linting process includes the SCSS files and not only the JS file, base on that we concluded that using only ESLint to do both things wasn't the best option, so, we integrated prettier with Stylelint, and for that we used a neat plugin that allowed us to use Prettier inside Stylelint here is the link, https://github.com/prettier/stylelint-prettier#recommended-configuration, I hope that this can help you, hasta pronto!, :)
