StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. RubyMotion vs Swift

RubyMotion vs Swift

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Swift
Swift
Stacks21.9K
Followers13.6K
Votes1.3K
RubyMotion
RubyMotion
Stacks25
Followers54
Votes25

RubyMotion vs Swift: What are the differences?

Introduction:

1. Language Paradigm: RubyMotion uses Ruby, an object-oriented language, while Swift is a multi-paradigm language that incorporates both object-oriented and functional programming concepts. This difference in language paradigms can affect how developers approach problem-solving and code structuring in each platform.

2. Platforms Supported: RubyMotion primarily targets iOS and OS X development, while Swift can be used for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS development. This wider range of platform support in Swift gives developers more flexibility in creating cross-platform applications.

3. Compilation Process: RubyMotion uses a Ruby-to-C compilation process, while Swift compiles directly to machine code. This difference can result in performance variations between the two languages, with Swift potentially offering faster execution times due to its direct compilation approach.

4. Community Support: Swift has a larger and more vibrant community compared to RubyMotion. This difference can impact the availability of resources, libraries, and frameworks for developers using each language, with Swift users having more options for community-driven support.

5. Learning Curve: Swift is designed to be an easy-to-learn language for developers, especially those coming from a background in languages like JavaScript and Java. On the other hand, RubyMotion may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its more specialized use case and syntactical differences from mainstream languages.

6. IDE Integration: Swift is tightly integrated with Xcode, Apple's official IDE, providing a seamless development experience for iOS and macOS projects. In contrast, RubyMotion developers may need to rely on third-party tools and plugins for IDE support, potentially leading to a less streamlined workflow.

In Summary, RubyMotion and Swift differ in language paradigms, supported platforms, compilation processes, community support, learning curve, and IDE integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Swift
Swift
RubyMotion
RubyMotion

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

RubyMotion lets you quickly develop cross-platform native apps for iOS, Android and OS X, all using your favorite editor and the awesome Ruby language you know and love.

Statistics
Stacks
21.9K
Stacks
25
Followers
13.6K
Followers
54
Votes
1.3K
Votes
25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 259
    Ios
  • 180
    Elegant
  • 126
    Not Objective-C
  • 107
    Backed by apple
  • 93
    Type inference
Cons
  • 6
    Must own a mac
  • 2
    Memory leaks are not uncommon
  • 1
    Complicated process for exporting modules
  • 1
    Is a lot more effort than lua to make simple functions
  • 1
    Its classes compile to roughly 300 lines of assembly
Pros
  • 6
    Ruby Syntax
  • 4
    Great Community
  • 4
    Editor + Terminal workflow; minimal Xcode involvement
  • 3
    Fast Prototyping
  • 3
    Great gems, libraries, and frameworks
Integrations
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Swift, RubyMotion?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase