StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Robolectric vs Robotium

Robolectric vs Robotium

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Robolectric
Robolectric
Stacks216
Followers31
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.0K
Forks1.4K
Robotium
Robotium
Stacks7
Followers17
Votes0

Robolectric vs Robotium: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to testing Android applications, developers often rely on frameworks like Robolectric and Robotium. These two frameworks have become popular choices for testing Android apps, but they have key differences that developers should be aware of.

  1. Testing Level: Robolectric is used for unit testing while Robotium is used for functional testing. Robolectric allows developers to run tests on a traditional JVM without the need for an emulator or device, making it ideal for unit testing individual components of an app. On the other hand, Robotium is designed for testing the app's user interface on a real device or emulator, allowing for end-to-end functional testing.

  2. Environment Setup: Robolectric requires a simulated Android environment to run tests, while Robotium requires an actual Android device or emulator. Robolectric provides a simulated environment that mimics the behavior of Android classes and components, making it easier to execute tests in a controlled environment. In contrast, Robotium interacts with the app as a user would, allowing for more comprehensive testing but requiring setup on an actual device or emulator.

  3. Accessibility: Robolectric can access and manipulate Android components directly through the API, allowing developers to test interactions at a low level. Robotium, on the other hand, interacts with the app's UI elements through the user interface, simulating user interactions like tapping buttons or entering text. This makes Robotium better suited for testing the overall user experience of the app.

  4. Test Speed: Robolectric tests typically run faster than Robotium tests due to the simulated environment and lack of device or emulator dependencies. This makes it easier to iterate and run tests frequently during development. On the other hand, Robotium tests may take longer to execute, especially if the app has complex UI elements or interactions that require interaction with the user interface.

  5. Integration with IDE: Robolectric integrates seamlessly with popular IDEs like Android Studio, providing features like autocompletion, inline documentation, and easy debugging. Robotium, while still compatible with IDEs, may require additional setup and configuration to work effectively within the development environment.

In Summary, Robolectric is ideal for unit testing in a simulated environment with a focus on testing individual components, while Robotium is better suited for functional testing on a real device or emulator, focusing on end-to-end testing of the user interface.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Robolectric
Robolectric
Robotium
Robotium

It is a framework that brings fast and reliable unit tests to Android. Tests run inside the JVM on your workstation in seconds. Test drive your Android application with robolectric

It is an Android test automation framework that has full support for native and hybrid applications. It makes it easy to write powerful and robust automatic black-box UI tests for Android applications.

Test APIs & Isolation; Run Tests Outside of the Emulator; SDK, Resources, & Native Method Simulation; No Mocking Frameworks Required.
Test Android apps, both native and hybrid; Requires minimal knowledge of the application under test; The framework handles multiple Android activities automatically; Minimal time needed to write solid test cases; Readability of test cases is greatly improved, compared to standard instrumentation tests
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
216
Stacks
7
Followers
31
Followers
17
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Android Studio
Android Studio
JUnit
JUnit
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Android Studio
Android Studio
Gradle
Gradle
Eclipse
Eclipse
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Android OS
Android OS

What are some alternatives to Robolectric, Robotium?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

BitBar

BitBar

Testdroid provides a set of products for Android and iOS app/game testing on real devices. With different testing solutions, you can efficiently develop and test your mobile apps/games in agile way and achieve your business goals.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp