StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. Redis vs Solr

Redis vs Solr

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Redis
Redis
Stacks61.9K
Followers46.5K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars42
Forks6
Solr
Solr
Stacks805
Followers644
Votes126

Redis vs Solr: What are the differences?

Introduction

Redis and Solr are both popular tools used for data storage and retrieval. While they share similarities in terms of their purpose, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Data Structure: Redis is a key-value store, where each key is associated with a value. It supports various data structures such as strings, lists, sets, hashes, and sorted sets. On the other hand, Solr is a search platform built on Apache Lucene, offering advanced indexing, querying, and searching capabilities for structured and unstructured data.

  2. Querying and Indexing: Redis primarily focuses on simple data operations, making it ideal for caching and real-time data storage. It provides basic querying capabilities but lacks advanced filtering and searching functionalities. In contrast, Solr is designed specifically for complex search operations. It supports versatile querying and indexing features like full-text search, faceted search, filtering, and result highlighting.

  3. Scale and Replication: Redis is known for its in-memory processing and high-performance capabilities, making it a great choice for scenarios that require extremely fast data retrieval. It also provides built-in support for replication and clustering, allowing the data to be distributed across multiple Redis instances. On the other hand, Solr is optimized for handling large-scale data sets, especially for search-intensive workloads. It supports distributed indexing and searching, enabling horizontal scaling across multiple servers.

  4. Complexity and Flexibility: Redis has a minimalist design with a simple command set, making it easy to use and integrate with various applications. It is commonly used as a flexible cache or messaging system. Solr, on the other hand, offers a rich set of features and complex query syntax, making it more suitable for scenarios that require advanced search capabilities, such as e-commerce platforms or content management systems.

  5. Text Search vs. Key-Value Store: While Redis does provide basic text search capabilities, it is more widely used as a key-value store and caching system. It excels in scenarios where the data is frequently read and written at high speeds. Solr, on the other hand, is specifically designed for text search use cases. It offers extensive text analysis and search relevance features, making it a powerful tool for building search applications.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Both Redis and Solr have active open-source communities and a wide range of supporting tools and libraries. However, Solr, being built on top of Apache Lucene, benefits from a mature and robust ecosystem. It has extensive documentation, a large user community, and a wide array of plugins and extensions available, making it easier to find support and resources for Solr-based projects.

In summary, Redis is a high-performance key-value store suitable for caching and real-time data storage, while Solr is a search platform optimized for complex search operations. Redis is lightweight, simple, and flexible, while Solr offers advanced querying, indexing, and search functionalities with a rich ecosystem to support enterprise-grade search applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Redis
Redis
Solr
Solr

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Solr is the popular, blazing fast open source enterprise search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, near real-time indexing, dynamic clustering, database integration, rich document (e.g., Word, PDF) handling, and geospatial search. Solr is highly reliable, scalable and fault tolerant, providing distributed indexing, replication and load-balanced querying, automated failover and recovery, centralized configuration and more. Solr powers the search and navigation features of many of the world's largest internet sites.

-
Advanced full-text search capabilities; Optimized for high volume web traffic; Standards-based open interfaces - XML, JSON and HTTP; Comprehensive HTML administration interfaces; Server statistics exposed over JMX for monitoring; Linearly scalable, auto index replication, auto-failover and recovery; Near real-time indexing; Flexible and adaptable with XML configuration; Extensible plugin architecture
Statistics
GitHub Stars
42
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
61.9K
Stacks
805
Followers
46.5K
Followers
644
Votes
3.9K
Votes
126
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 888
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 514
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
Cons
  • 15
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 3
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL
Pros
  • 35
    Powerful
  • 22
    Indexing and searching
  • 20
    Scalable
  • 19
    Customizable
  • 13
    Enterprise Ready
Integrations
No integrations available
Lucene
Lucene

What are some alternatives to Redis, Solr?

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

VoltDB

VoltDB

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

Azure Redis Cache

Azure Redis Cache

It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern.

Dejavu

Dejavu

dejaVu fits the unmet need of being a hackable data browser for Elasticsearch. Existing browsers were either built with a legacy UI and had a lacking user experience or used server side rendering (I am looking at you, Kibana).

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase