StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Recharts vs Vue.js

Recharts vs Vue.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vue.js
Vue.js
Stacks55.5K
Followers44.7K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars209.7K
Forks33.8K
Recharts
Recharts
Stacks233
Followers259
Votes36
GitHub Stars26.2K
Forks1.8K

Recharts vs Vue.js: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Recharts and Vue.js

Recharts and Vue.js are both powerful tools for data visualization, but they have some key differences that make them unique in their own ways.

  1. Component-based vs Chart-specific: Vue.js is a comprehensive JavaScript framework for building user interfaces, while Recharts is a charting library specifically designed for React. Vue.js allows developers to create reusable UI components with ease, making it suitable for building complex applications beyond just charts. On the other hand, Recharts focuses solely on providing a wide range of charting options with a simple and intuitive API.

  2. Data-driven vs Template-driven: Vue.js follows a data-driven approach, where the UI is built based on data and updates are automatically reflected in the UI. Developers can manipulate and transform data easily to drive the rendering of components. Recharts, on the other hand, adopts a template-driven approach, where the chart configuration is defined using JSX-like syntax. It provides a declarative way to describe how data should be visualized in the chart.

  3. Complete UI framework vs Chart-only solution: Vue.js is a complete UI framework that includes features like routing, state management, and reactivity, making it suitable for building full-fledged applications. Recharts, on the other hand, is a specialized charting library that focuses solely on providing a wide range of chart types and customization options. It is intended to be used alongside other libraries or frameworks to create interactive visualizations.

  4. Community and ecosystem: Vue.js has a large and vibrant community, with a rich ecosystem of community-driven plugins, tools, and resources. It has gained significant popularity and has a growing number of contributors and adopters. Recharts, being a charting library specifically designed for React, has a smaller but still active community. It benefits from the wider React ecosystem and integrates well with other React components and libraries.

  5. Learning curve: Vue.js has a gentle learning curve and is often praised for its simplicity and ease of use. It provides clear and concise documentation, making it easy for beginners to get started. Recharts, while relatively straightforward, requires a basic understanding of React to fully leverage its capabilities. Developers who are already familiar with React will find it easier to work with Recharts.

  6. Customizability and extensibility: Both Vue.js and Recharts offer customization options, but they differ in their approaches. Vue.js provides a flexible and powerful system for creating custom components and extending existing ones. Developers can easily modify the appearance and behavior of Vue.js components to suit their needs. Recharts, on the other hand, provides a wide range of configuration options and supports theming. It allows developers to customize the look and feel of the charts by adjusting properties and styles.

In Summary, Recharts is a specialized charting library for React that provides a simple and intuitive API for creating interactive charts, while Vue.js is a comprehensive JavaScript framework for building user interfaces with a data-driven approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Vue.js, Recharts

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Simon
Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

DecidedonVuetifyVuetifyVue.jsVue.jsNuxt.jsNuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

  • @{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
  • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
  • @{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
  • @{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
  • @{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
  • @{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
  • @{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
  • @{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
  • @{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

  • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
  • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
  • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
  • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
  • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
  • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
5.13M views5.13M
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Vue.js
Vue.js
Recharts
Recharts

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Quickly build your charts with decoupled, reusable React components. Built on top of SVG elements with a lightweight dependency on D3 submodules.

Reactivity; Components; Modularity; Animations; Routing; Stability; Extendable Data bindings; Plain JS object models; Build UI by composing components; Mix & matching small libraries
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
209.7K
GitHub Stars
26.2K
GitHub Forks
33.8K
GitHub Forks
1.8K
Stacks
55.5K
Stacks
233
Followers
44.7K
Followers
259
Votes
1.6K
Votes
36
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 294
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 230
    Good documentation
  • 196
    Components
  • 131
    Simple the best
  • 100
    Simplified AngularJS
Cons
  • 9
    Less Common Place
  • 5
    YXMLvsHTML Markup
  • 3
    Don't support fragments
  • 3
    Only support programatically multiple root nodes
Pros
  • 11
    Very intuitive API
  • 8
    Built for React, from scratch
  • 7
    Responsive
  • 5
    Composable chart elements
  • 3
    Easy to use
Cons
  • 2
    Not considered time series charts
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React
D3.js
D3.js

What are some alternatives to Vue.js, Recharts?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

D3.js

D3.js

It is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. Emphasises on web standards gives you the full capabilities of modern browsers without tying yourself to a proprietary framework.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase