StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Hyperloop vs VueStrap

Hyperloop vs VueStrap

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

VueStrap
VueStrap
Stacks3
Followers24
Votes2
GitHub Stars4.7K
Forks919
Hyperloop
Hyperloop
Stacks3
Followers15
Votes2

Hyperloop vs VueStrap: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Hyperloop and VueStrap, two popular technologies used in web development.

  1. Architecture: Hyperloop is a RubyGem that allows Ruby developers to create real-time web applications using Ruby on Rails, while VueStrap is a set of Vue.js components that are styled using Bootstrap. Hyperloop enables developers to build reactive, real-time web applications, whereas VueStrap focuses on providing pre-styled components for Vue.js applications.

  2. Integration: Hyperloop integrates seamlessly with Ruby on Rails, allowing developers to create full-stack web applications using Ruby. In contrast, VueStrap is designed to work with Vue.js, providing Vue developers with pre-built components that are styled with Bootstrap.

  3. Community Support: Hyperloop has a smaller community compared to VueStrap due to its niche focus on enhancing Ruby on Rails with real-time capabilities. VueStrap, on the other hand, benefits from the extensive community support of both Vue.js and Bootstrap, making it easier for developers to find resources and assistance.

  4. Performance: Hyperloop offers high-performance real-time capabilities for Ruby on Rails applications, allowing for seamless data synchronization between the client and server. VueStrap focuses more on providing visually appealing interface components, with performance optimizations geared towards Vue.js applications.

  5. Flexibility: Hyperloop provides a comprehensive framework for building reactive web applications, with support for real-time updates and data synchronization out of the box. In contrast, VueStrap offers a collection of pre-styled components that can be easily integrated into Vue.js projects, providing developers with a quick and efficient way to add Bootstrap-styled elements to their applications.

  6. Learning Curve: Hyperloop may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to Ruby on Rails, as it introduces real-time web development concepts that may be unfamiliar. VueStrap, on the other hand, leverages the familiarity of both Vue.js and Bootstrap, making it more accessible to developers who are already familiar with these technologies.

In Summary, the key differences between Hyperloop and VueStrap lie in their architecture, integration with respective frameworks, community support, performance focus, flexibility in use cases, and learning curve for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

VueStrap
VueStrap
Hyperloop
Hyperloop

Bootstrap components built with Vue.js

Hyperloop lets you build beautiful interactive user interfaces using the same Ruby language running your server side code. Reactrb replaces JS code, JSX, HTML, templating languages, and complex frameworks with one simple system.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
919
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3
Stacks
3
Followers
24
Followers
15
Votes
2
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Bootstrap v3.x
Cons
  • 1
    No longer maintained
  • 1
    Discontinued
  • 1
    No disable option for datepicker
  • 1
    Limited styling
Pros
  • 1
    Less of a context switch between front- & back ends
  • 1
    Ruby's power & elegance everywhere
Integrations
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Vue.js
Vue.js
React
React
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to VueStrap, Hyperloop?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase