StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. React Storybook vs Semantic UI

React Storybook vs Semantic UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Stacks992
Followers1.5K
Votes673
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks4.9K
React Storybook
React Storybook
Stacks635
Followers355
Votes0

React Storybook vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

React Storybook and Semantic UI are both commonly used tools in web development. However, they serve different purposes and have distinct features. In this article, we will explore the key differences between React Storybook and Semantic UI.

  1. API Accessibility: React Storybook primarily focuses on interactive component development and testing. It provides a user-friendly interface to view and interact with different components in isolation. In contrast, Semantic UI is a complete UI framework that offers a wide range of pre-built components and styles for building visually appealing user interfaces.

  2. Workflow Integration: React Storybook seamlessly integrates with popular libraries and frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular. It allows developers to develop, test, and document components independently from the main application logic. On the other hand, Semantic UI provides its own workflow for creating UI components, which may not be compatible with other frameworks.

  3. Purpose: React Storybook is primarily used for isolating and testing individual components during development, making it a valuable tool for developers. Its main purpose is to improve the component-driven development process. Semantic UI, on the other hand, aims to provide a comprehensive set of ready-to-use UI components and styles for building interactive and visually appealing web interfaces.

  4. Customization: React Storybook offers a high level of customization and extensibility. Developers can easily write custom addons, plugins, and themes to enhance the capabilities of the Storybook. Semantic UI also allows customization by overriding default styles and behaviors, but it may not provide the same level of flexibility as React Storybook.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: React Storybook has a large and active community of developers who contribute to its development and maintenance. It benefits from a wide range of community-supported addons, themes, and documentation. Semantic UI also has a significant community, but it may not be as vast as the React Storybook community.

  6. Varied Learning Curve: React Storybook requires developers to have a solid understanding of React and component-based development. It may be more suitable for experienced developers who are familiar with these concepts. Semantic UI, on the other hand, provides a more beginner-friendly approach with its pre-built components and straightforward API.

In summary, React Storybook focuses on interactive component development and testing, with a strong emphasis on customization and extensibility, while Semantic UI provides a complete UI framework with a wide range of pre-built components and straightforward API.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
React Storybook
React Storybook

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

You just load your UI components into the React Storybook and start developing them. This functionality allows you to develop UI components rapidly without worrying about the app. It will improve your team’s collaboration and feedback loop.

Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained
Isolated environment for your components (with the use of various iframe tactics);Hot module reloading (even for functional stateless components);Works with any app (whether it's Redux, Relay or Meteor);Support for CSS (whether it's plain old CSS, CSS modules or something fancy);Clean and fast user interface;Runs inside your project (so, it uses your app's NPM modules and babel configurations out of the box);Serves static files (if you host static files inside your app);Deploy the whole storybook as a static app;Extendable as necessary (support for custom webpack loaders and plugins)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
992
Stacks
635
Followers
1.5K
Followers
355
Votes
673
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
Cons
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery
Cons
  • 5
    Hard dependency to Babel loader
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Ember.js
Ember.js
Meteor
Meteor
React
React
React Native
React Native
Vue.js
Vue.js

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI, React Storybook?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase