StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. React Native vs Spring-Boot

React Native vs Spring-Boot

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React Native
React Native
Stacks34.4K
Followers29.5K
Votes1.2K
GitHub Stars124.4K
Forks24.9K
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Stacks26.7K
Followers24.3K
Votes1.0K
GitHub Stars78.9K
Forks41.6K

React Native vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Introduction

React Native and Spring Boot are both popular frameworks used for web and mobile application development. While React Native is used for building cross-platform mobile applications, Spring Boot is used for building server-side web applications. Although they both have their own strengths and weaknesses, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Codebase: React Native allows developers to write code once and use it across both iOS and Android platforms. This enables faster development and reduces the need for writing separate codebases for each platform. On the other hand, Spring Boot is primarily used for server-side development and requires separate codebases for different platforms.

  2. Technology Stack: React Native is based on JavaScript and utilizes various libraries and frameworks such as React, Redux, and Expo. It provides a wide range of components and APIs for building user interfaces and accessing device-specific functionalities. Spring Boot, on the other hand, is based on Java and utilizes the Spring framework. It provides a comprehensive set of tools and libraries for building enterprise-level web applications.

  3. Performance: React Native relies on JavaScript bridges to communicate between native components and JavaScript code. Although it provides a near-native performance, it may face performance limitations when heavy computation or complex animations are involved. On the other hand, Spring Boot being a server-side framework, allows for greater control over performance optimizations and can handle heavy workloads more efficiently.

  4. Development Workflow: React Native provides a live reloading feature that allows developers to see instant changes in the app without rebuilding or restarting it. This enables faster development and debugging. Spring Boot, on the other hand, requires rebuilding and redeploying the application to see changes, which can slow down the development process.

  5. Ecosystem and Support: React Native has a large and active community of developers, which results in extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party libraries. This provides a wide range of resources and support for developers. Spring Boot also has a strong community support but is more focused on enterprise-level development, with extensive documentation and support available for building scalable and secure web applications.

  6. Deployment: React Native applications are deployed through app stores or as web applications. The deployment process involves submitting the app to the respective app stores and going through their review process. Spring Boot applications, being server-side applications, are typically deployed on cloud platforms, virtual machines, or dedicated servers. The deployment process involves configuring the server environment and deploying the application using tools like Docker or traditional server deployments.

In summary, React Native allows for cross-platform development with a JavaScript-based technology stack, providing a faster development workflow and a large ecosystem. Spring Boot, on the other hand, focuses on server-side development with a Java-based technology stack, allowing for greater control over performance and providing extensive support for enterprise-level web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React Native, Spring Boot

Nick
Nick

CTO at Pickio

Jun 2, 2020

Decided

We built the first version of our app with RN and it turned out a mess in a while. A lot of bugs along with poor performance out of the box for a fairly large app. Many things, that native platform has, cannot be done with existing solutions for RN. For instance, large titles on iOS are not fully implemented in any of existing navigations libraries. Also there's painfully slow JSON bridge and many other small, yet annoying things. On the other hand Flutter became a really powerful and easy-to-use tool. A bit of a learning curve, of course, because of Dart, but it worth learning. Flutter offers TONS of built-in features, no JSON-bridge, AOT compilation for iOS.

491k views491k
Comments
Andrea
Andrea

May 26, 2020

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsVue NativeVue NativeReactReact

I'm a huge fan of Vue.js and I'm pretty comfortable with it. I need to build a mobile app for my company and I was now wondering whether I could make use of VueJS with Vue Native instead of switching to React. I know Vue Native builds on top of RN. My question is whether I'd have as much freedom with Vue Native over RN and whether you feel like Vue Native is "production ready" or not. Not sure of which shortcomings I may find using Vue Native... Thanks a lot!!!

336k views336k
Comments
Milan
Milan

May 6, 2020

Needs adviceonSpring BootSpring BootNode.jsNode.jsReactReact

Hi, I am looking to select tech stack for front end and back end development. Considering Spring Boot vs Node.js for developing microservices. Front end tech stack is selected as React framework. Both of them are equally good for me, long term perspective most of services will be more based on I/O vs heavy computing. Leaning toward node.js, but will require team to learn this tech stack, so little hesitant.

650k views650k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React Native
React Native
Spring Boot
Spring Boot

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Native iOS Components;Asynchronous Execution;Touch Handling;Flexbox and Styling; Polyfills
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
124.4K
GitHub Stars
78.9K
GitHub Forks
24.9K
GitHub Forks
41.6K
Stacks
34.4K
Stacks
26.7K
Followers
29.5K
Followers
24.3K
Votes
1.2K
Votes
1.0K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 214
    Learn once write everywhere
  • 174
    Cross platform
  • 169
    Javascript
  • 122
    Native ios components
  • 69
    Built by facebook
Cons
  • 23
    Javascript
  • 19
    Built by facebook
  • 12
    Cant use CSS
  • 4
    30 FPS Limit
  • 2
    Slow
Pros
  • 149
    Powerful and handy
  • 134
    Easy setup
  • 128
    Java
  • 90
    Spring
  • 85
    Fast
Cons
  • 23
    Heavy weight
  • 18
    Annotation ceremony
  • 13
    Java
  • 11
    Many config files needed
  • 5
    Reactive
Integrations
No integrations available
Spring
Spring
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to React Native, Spring Boot?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase