StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Rails vs Semantic UI

Rails vs Semantic UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rails
Rails
Stacks20.2K
Followers13.8K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars57.8K
Forks22.0K
Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Stacks992
Followers1.5K
Votes673
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks4.9K

Rails vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Rails and Semantic UI

Rails and Semantic UI are both powerful tools in web development, but they serve different purposes and have distinct characteristics that set them apart. Below are the key differences between Rails and Semantic UI:

1. **Framework vs. CSS Library**: Rails is a full-stack web application framework that follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architectural pattern, providing a structure for building dynamic web applications. On the other hand, Semantic UI is a front-end CSS framework that offers a set of pre-designed components and styles to design the user interface of a website or application.

2. **Back-End vs. Front-End**: Rails primarily focuses on the back-end development of web applications, handling server-side logic, database management, routing, and authentication. In contrast, Semantic UI is used for front-end development, concentrating on creating visually appealing and responsive user interfaces through its collection of CSS classes and components.

3. **Server-Side Templating vs. Front-End Styling**: Rails uses ERB (Embedded Ruby) as its default templating engine to generate dynamic HTML content on the server-side, allowing developers to embed Ruby code within HTML. Semantic UI, on the other hand, focuses on styling and designing the front-end user interface by providing a variety of CSS classes and components to enhance the visual appeal of web pages.

4. **Convention over Configuration vs. Customizable Styling**: Rails follows the principle of "Convention over Configuration," which emphasizes sensible defaults and conventions to streamline the development process. Semantic UI, on the other hand, offers a high level of customization, allowing developers to modify and style components according to their specific design requirements.

5. **Ruby vs. CSS/JavaScript**: Rails is primarily written in Ruby, a high-level programming language known for its simplicity and readability, whereas Semantic UI consists of CSS for styling and JavaScript for interactivity, making it easier to create visually appealing and interactive web interfaces.

6. **Backend Logic vs. User Experience**: Rails is more focused on implementing and managing backend logic, such as data processing, business logic, and server-side functionality, while Semantic UI is oriented towards enhancing the user experience through the design and layout of the front-end interface.

In Summary, Rails excels in backend development with a focus on server-side logic and MVC architecture, while Semantic UI shines in front-end development by providing pre-designed components and customizable styling options for creating visually appealing user interfaces.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Rails, Semantic UI

Shivam
Shivam

AVP - Business at VAYUZ Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Mar 25, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsJavaJavaRailsRails

Hi Community! Trust everyone is keeping safe. I am exploring the idea of building a #Neobank (App) with end-to-end banking capabilities. In the process of exploring this space, I have come across multiple Apps (N26, Revolut, Monese, etc) and explored their stacks in detail. The confusion remains to be the Backend Tech to be used?

What would you go with considering all of the languages such as Node.js Java Rails Python are suggested by some person or the other. As a general trend, I have noticed the usage of Node with React on the front or Node with a combination of Kotlin and Swift. Please suggest what would be the right approach!

915k views915k
Comments
Ben
Ben

May 19, 2020

Decided

As a small team, we wanted to pick the framework which allowed us to move quickly. There's no option better than Rails. Not having to solve the fundamentals means we can more quickly build our feature set. No other framework can beat ActiveRecord in terms of integration & ease-of use. To top it all of, there's a lot of attention paid to security in the framework, making almost everything safe-by-default.

482k views482k
Comments
Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Decided

Since I came from python I had two choices: #django or #flask. It felt like it was a better idea to go for #django considering I was building a blogging platform, this is kind of what #django was made for. On the other hand, #rails seems to be a fantastic framework to get things done. Although I do not regret any of my time spent on developing with #django I want to give @{#rails}|topic:null| a try some day in the future for the sake of curiosity.

438k views438k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rails
Rails
Semantic UI
Semantic UI

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

-
Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained
Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.8K
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Forks
22.0K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
Stacks
20.2K
Stacks
992
Followers
13.8K
Followers
1.5K
Votes
5.5K
Votes
673
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 860
    Rapid development
  • 653
    Great gems
  • 607
    Great community
  • 486
    Convention over configuration
  • 418
    Mvc
Cons
  • 24
    Too much "magic" (hidden behavior)
  • 14
    Poor raw performance
  • 12
    Asset system is too primitive and outdated
  • 6
    Bloat in models
  • 6
    Heavy use of mixins
Pros
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
Cons
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Ember.js
Ember.js
Meteor
Meteor

What are some alternatives to Rails, Semantic UI?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase