Puma vs Apache Tomcat: What are the differences?
Puma: A Modern, Concurrent Web Server for Ruby. Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications; Apache Tomcat: An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies. Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.
Puma and Apache Tomcat belong to "Web Servers" category of the tech stack.
"Easy" is the top reason why over 2 developers like Puma, while over 76 developers mention "Easy" as the leading cause for choosing Apache Tomcat.
Puma and Apache Tomcat are both open source tools. It seems that Puma with 5.78K GitHub stars and 987 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Apache Tomcat with 3.51K GitHub stars and 2.4K GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, Apache Tomcat has a broader approval, being mentioned in 566 company stacks & 430 developers stacks; compared to Puma, which is listed in 73 company stacks and 30 developer stacks.
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Puma?
What is Apache Tomcat?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Puma?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions