StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Pug vs Semantic UI

Pug vs Semantic UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Stacks992
Followers1.5K
Votes673
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks4.9K
Pug
Pug
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.2K
Votes467

Pug vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

**Introduction:**
In this comparison, we will examine the key differences between Pug and Semantic UI, two popular tools used in web development.

**1. Syntax:**
Pug uses indentation-based syntax to structure HTML documents concisely, whereas Semantic UI provides a set of pre-built CSS classes and JavaScript components for easily styling and laying out elements on a webpage.

**2. Templating language:**
Pug is a templating language that allows for dynamic content generation in HTML, making it easier to reuse code and maintain consistency, while Semantic UI focuses on front-end design and layout to enhance the user interface.

**3. Learning curve:**
Pug requires developers to understand its specific syntax and structure, which may have a steeper learning curve for beginners, unlike Semantic UI, which offers a more intuitive approach to styling elements using predefined classes and components.

**4. Customization options:**
Pug allows for a high level of customization through its templating features, enabling developers to create dynamic content more efficiently, while Semantic UI provides a wide range of customizable themes and styling options to tailor the appearance of a website.

**5. Integration with frameworks:**
Pug can be easily integrated with popular frameworks like Express.js for server-side rendering, enhancing the overall performance and scalability of web applications, whereas Semantic UI is designed as a standalone library for front-end design and may require additional plugins for seamless integration with frameworks.

**6. Community support:**
Pug has a strong community of developers contributing to its ongoing development and enhancement, providing regular updates and documentation, while Semantic UI boasts a large user base and community support for troubleshooting and sharing best practices in web design.

In Summary, Pug and Semantic UI differ in syntax, templating language, learning curve, customization options, integration with frameworks, and community support in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Pug
Pug

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
992
Stacks
1.3K
Followers
1.5K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
673
Votes
467
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
Cons
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery
Pros
  • 138
    Elegant html
  • 90
    Great with nodejs
  • 59
    Very short syntax
  • 59
    Open source
  • 54
    Structured with indentation
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Ember.js
Ember.js
Meteor
Meteor
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI, Pug?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase