StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Presto vs TiDB

Presto vs TiDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Presto
Presto
Stacks394
Followers1.0K
Votes66
TiDB
TiDB
Stacks76
Followers177
Votes28
GitHub Stars39.3K
Forks6.0K

Presto vs TiDB: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between Presto and TiDB are outlined below:

1. **Architecture**:
Presto is a distributed SQL query engine that excels at running interactive analytic queries against various data sources. TiDB, on the other hand, is a distributed NewSQL HTAP database that combines the advantages of both traditional RDBMS and NoSQL databases, offering horizontal scalability and strong consistency.

2. **Consistency Model**:
Presto provides eventual consistency in terms of reading data, allowing for fast query processing but potentially causing inconsistencies in concurrent transactions. TiDB, on the contrary, provides ACID transactions and strong consistency guarantees, making it suitable for mission-critical applications where data integrity is paramount.

3. **Storage Engine**:
Presto utilizes a pluggable storage layer that interfaces with external data sources like HDFS, S3, and MySQL. TiDB employs a distributed Key-Value store that is specifically designed for cloud-native applications and supports horizontally scalable data storage with in-built sharding capabilities.

4. **SQL Support**:
Presto supports ANSI SQL and can query data from various sources like HDFS, MySQL, and Cassandra using connectors. TiDB also supports the majority of ANSI SQL standards but provides additional SQL features for distributed transactions and data sharding, making it more suitable for complex OLTP and analytical workloads.

5. **Community and Ecosystem**:
Presto has a large open-source community supporting its development and maintenance, with contributions from various organizations like Facebook and Teradata. TiDB, although relatively newer, has gained traction in the open-source community and is backed by PingCAP, the company behind its development, ensuring continuous improvements and support.

6. **Scalability and Performance**:
While both Presto and TiDB offer scalability, Presto's primary focus is fast query processing for analytical workloads, making it suitable for ad-hoc queries and data exploration. TiDB, with its NewSQL architecture, excels in supporting OLTP workloads with high transactional throughput and low-latency responses, ideal for real-time applications and online services.

In Summary, Presto and TiDB differ in their architecture, consistency model, storage engine, SQL support, community, and focus on scalability and performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Presto, TiDB

Ashish
Ashish

Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest

Nov 27, 2019

Needs adviceonApache HiveApache HivePrestoPrestoAmazon EC2Amazon EC2

To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

#BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

3.72M views3.72M
Comments
Karthik
Karthik

CPO at Cantiz

Nov 5, 2019

Decided

The platform deals with time series data from sensors aggregated against things( event data that originates at periodic intervals). We use Cassandra as our distributed database to store time series data. Aggregated data insights from Cassandra is delivered as web API for consumption from other applications. Presto as a distributed sql querying engine, can provide a faster execution time provided the queries are tuned for proper distribution across the cluster. Another objective that we had was to combine Cassandra table data with other business data from RDBMS or other big data systems where presto through its connector architecture would have opened up a whole lot of options for us.

225k views225k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Presto
Presto
TiDB
TiDB

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Inspired by the design of Google F1, TiDB supports the best features of both traditional RDBMS and NoSQL.

-
Horizontal scalability;Asynchronous schema changes;Consistent distributed transactions;Compatible with MySQL protocol;Written in Go;NewSQL over TiKV;Multiple storage engine support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
39.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.0K
Stacks
394
Stacks
76
Followers
1.0K
Followers
177
Votes
66
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    Works directly on files in s3 (no ETL)
  • 13
    Open-source
  • 12
    Join multiple databases
  • 10
    Scalable
  • 7
    Gets ready in minutes
Pros
  • 9
    Open source
  • 7
    Horizontal scalability
  • 5
    Strong ACID
  • 3
    HTAP
  • 2
    Mysql Compatibility
Integrations
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Kafka
Kafka
Redis
Redis
MySQL
MySQL
Hadoop
Hadoop
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Presto, TiDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase