1. Integration with other tools: PractiTest offers integration with a wide range of third-party tools like Jira, Redmine, Slack, and more. On the other hand, TestLodge has limited integrations with tools such as Jira and Slack, but lacks the extensive integration options provided by PractiTest.

2. Customization of fields and workflows: PractiTest allows users to customize fields and workflows extensively according to their testing needs. In contrast, TestLodge has limited customization options, making it less flexible in adapting to specific testing requirements.

3. Test management features: PractiTest provides advanced features like requirements management, test cycle planning, and comprehensive reporting capabilities. TestLodge, while offering basic test management functionality, lacks the depth and range of features provided by PractiTest.

4. User interface and intuitiveness: PractiTest is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, making it easier for users to navigate and utilize the software effectively. TestLodge, although functional, may not be as visually appealing or intuitive in terms of user experience.

5. Collaboration and teamwork: PractiTest facilitates teamwork and collaboration through features like role-based access control, comments, and discussions within test cases. TestLodge, while allowing collaboration to some extent, may not offer as robust collaboration tools as PractiTest.

6. Scalability and enterprise-level support: PractiTest is designed to cater to the needs of both small teams and large enterprises, offering scalability in terms of the number of users and projects. TestLodge, while suitable for smaller teams, may lack the scalability and enterprise-level support provided by PractiTest.

In Summary, PractiTest stands out for its extensive integration options, customizable fields and workflows, advanced test management features, user-friendly interface, collaboration tools, and scalability, setting it apart from TestLodge.