Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Postman vs ShipStation: What are the differences?
Integration Capabilities: Postman is primarily used for testing APIs, while ShipStation is designed for managing e-commerce order fulfillment. ShipStation offers robust integrations with various shopping carts, marketplaces, and carriers, enabling seamless order processing and shipment tracking. In contrast, Postman's integrations are more focused on API testing and development, offering a wide range of tools for debugging and monitoring API endpoints.
User Interface: ShipStation provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface to streamline order processing, label printing, and shipment tracking. On the other hand, Postman offers a more technical and developer-centric interface, with features such as request building, response visualization, and automated testing functionalities. The user interface difference reflects the distinct purposes of the two platforms, catering to different user groups.
Automation Capabilities: ShipStation offers automation features like rules and workflows to automate order processing tasks, label creation, and shipment notifications. In contrast, Postman focuses on API automation through scripts and collections, allowing users to automate API testing, monitoring, and documentation processes. The automation capabilities of both platforms serve different purposes based on their target users and use cases.
Reporting and Analytics: ShipStation provides detailed reports and analytics on order fulfillment, shipping costs, carrier performance, and customer insights to help businesses optimize their shipping processes and improve customer satisfaction. On the other hand, Postman offers basic reporting features for API testing and monitoring, focusing more on debugging and performance analysis of APIs. The reporting capabilities of ShipStation cater to e-commerce businesses' specific needs, while Postman's reporting is tailored to API development requirements.
Multi-Channel Support: ShipStation supports multi-channel selling by integrating with various sales channels, including e-commerce platforms, marketplaces, and shopping carts. This allows businesses to centralize order management and shipment processing across multiple channels. In contrast, Postman is primarily focused on API testing and development, with limited support for multi-channel integration. The multi-channel support of ShipStation distinguishes it as a comprehensive solution for e-commerce order fulfillment.
Customer Support: ShipStation offers dedicated customer support, including phone, email, and chat support, to assist users with setup, troubleshooting, and training. Postman provides community support through forums, documentation, and tutorials, catering to a more self-service approach for technical assistance. The difference in customer support reflects the target audience and requirements of each platform, with ShipStation prioritizing personalized assistance for e-commerce businesses' operational needs.
In Summary, Postman and ShipStation offer distinct functionalities tailored to API testing and e-commerce order fulfillment, respectively, with differences in integration capabilities, user interface, automation, reporting, multi-channel support, and customer support.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Pros of ShipStation
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1