Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Photon

28
88
+ 1
0
PlayFab

37
86
+ 1
0
Add tool

Photon vs PlayFab: What are the differences?

Photon and PlayFab are both popular services for developing and managing online multiplayer games. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences between the two platforms.

  1. Deployment: Photon provides a dedicated server architecture that allows developers to host and manage their game servers independently. On the other hand, PlayFab offers a managed service that takes care of hosting and scaling game servers automatically. This difference gives developers more control over server infrastructure in Photon, while PlayFab simplifies server management.
  2. Networking: Photon emphasizes low-latency and real-time networking, making it suitable for fast-paced multiplayer games. It provides a powerful networking engine that allows for reliable communication between clients and servers. PlayFab, on the other hand, focuses more on providing backend services for game development, such as player management and matchmaking. While PlayFab also supports networking, it may not offer the same level of performance and flexibility as Photon.
  3. Development Environment: Photon offers a wide range of client SDKs and plugins, making it compatible with multiple platforms and game engines. It provides extensive documentation and examples to facilitate development. PlayFab, on the other hand, integrates well with popular game engines like Unity and Unreal Engine, providing native plugins and APIs for easier integration. This difference allows developers to choose the development environment that best suits their needs.
  4. Pricing Model: Photon offers a tiered pricing model based on the number of concurrent users and data usage, allowing developers to choose a plan that matches their expected player base. PlayFab, on the other hand, follows a usage-based pricing model, charging developers based on the number of API calls and server resources consumed. This difference in pricing models gives developers more flexibility in choosing the most cost-effective option.
  5. Integration with Existing Services: PlayFab provides built-in integrations with popular services like Xbox Live, Steam, and Google Play, making it easier for developers to leverage existing platforms and services. Photon, on the other hand, offers more flexibility in integrating with custom backend systems and databases. This difference allows developers to choose the level of integration with external services that suits their game's requirements.
  6. Community and Support: Photon has a large and active community of developers, with extensive forums and documentation available. It also offers professional support for its services. PlayFab also has a well-established community and support system, with forums, tutorials, and documentation to assist developers. However, with its focus on backend services, PlayFab's community and support may have more emphasis on broader game development topics rather than low-level networking.

In summary, Photon and PlayFab differ in their deployment options, networking capabilities, development environments, pricing models, integration with existing services, and community and support systems. These differences allow developers to choose the platform that best suits their specific needs as they build and manage their online multiplayer games.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Photon?

The fastest way to build beautiful Electron apps using simple HTML and CSS. Underneath it all is Electron. Originally built for GitHub's Atom text editor, Electron is the easiest way to build cross-platform desktop applications.

What is PlayFab?

It unlocks a new world of creativity for game developers by providing a cross-platform "backend-as-a-service" built exclusively for games. We give game developers the tools, technologies, and know-how they need to have a trouble-free launch day, and profitable day-to-day operations after that.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Photon?
What companies use PlayFab?
See which teams inside your own company are using Photon or PlayFab.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Photon?
What tools integrate with PlayFab?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Photon and PlayFab?
Electron
With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.
Atom
At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.
Wave
It is a free, online software alternative to Quickbooks. Wave helps manage invoices, credit card payments, accounting & payroll. Best for small businesses & freelancers.
JavaFX
It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.
pygame
It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.
See all alternatives