Phoenix Framework vs Polymer: What are the differences?

1. MVC Architecture: Phoenix Framework follows a Model-View-Controller architecture, which helps in separating concerns by defining separate layers for data manipulation, user interface, and business logic. On the other hand, Polymer follows a component-based architecture, where reusable web components are created and used throughout the application.

2. Server-side vs Client-side: Phoenix Framework is a server-side framework built on Elixir and provides robust server-side capabilities such as routing, database interactions, and session management. In contrast, Polymer is a client-side library that helps in building dynamic, interactive user interfaces directly in the browser with Web Components and templates.

3. Data Binding: Polymer provides two-way data binding out of the box, which means changes in the model are reflected in the view and vice versa. Phoenix Framework does not offer built-in two-way data binding like Polymer; developers need to handle data binding manually.

4. Language: Phoenix Framework is written in Elixir, a functional programming language built on top of Erlang VM, which provides fault-tolerant and distributed capabilities. Polymer, on the other hand, is primarily based on JavaScript and leverages modern web technologies like Web Components and Shadow DOM.

5. Community and Ecosystem: Phoenix Framework has a smaller community compared to Polymer, which is supported by Google. Polymer has a vast ecosystem of tools, libraries, and resources, making it easier for developers to find solutions and support for their projects. Phoenix, while growing, may have limited resources and support compared to Polymer.

In Summary, Phoenix Framework and Polymer differ in their architecture, server-side vs client-side nature, data binding capabilities, programming language, and community support.