OpenAPI Specification vs Postman

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

OpenAPI Specification

247
145
+ 1
10
Postman

92.4K
79K
+ 1
1.8K
Add tool

OpenAPI Specification vs Postman: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Markdown code is a lightweight markup language that can be used to format text as well as add structure to web content. In this task, we will format the provided information about the key differences between OpenAPI Specification and Postman as Markdown code for use on a website.

Key differences between OpenAPI Specification and Postman:

  1. Programming Language Support: OpenAPI Specification (formerly known as Swagger) is language-agnostic and can be used with multiple programming languages. It provides a standardized way to describe APIs in a machine-readable format. On the other hand, Postman is primarily a client for making HTTP requests and testing APIs, with support for writing scripts in JavaScript. Postman's scripting capabilities allow developers to add custom logic and perform complex operations during API testing.

  2. API Documentation: OpenAPI Specification is designed to be a documentation-first approach for describing APIs. It allows developers to generate interactive API documentation, which can be easily consumed by other stakeholders. Postman, although it has a documentation feature, is more focused on the testing and development aspect of APIs. Its documentation capabilities are not as extensive as OpenAPI Specification.

  3. Collaboration and Sharing: OpenAPI Specification facilitates collaboration between stakeholders by providing a standardized format for describing APIs. It allows developers to share API specifications and collaborate on a single source of truth. Postman also offers collaboration features like team workspaces and shared collections, but it does not have a standardized format for API descriptions. Collaboration in Postman is more centered around sharing collections and test scripts.

  4. API Testing and Mocking: Postman is a comprehensive tool for API testing, allowing developers to create and run tests for ensuring API functionality. It provides features like assertions, test suites, and environments for managing test data. Postman also supports API mocking, which allows developers to simulate API responses. OpenAPI Specification, on the other hand, focuses on describing APIs and does not offer built-in support for testing or mocking.

  5. Integration with Development Workflows: OpenAPI Specification is commonly used in combination with other development tools and frameworks. It can be integrated into continuous integration and deployment pipelines to automate API testing and documentation generation. Postman, being a standalone tool, can also be integrated into workflows using features like Newman (a command-line tool for running Postman tests). However, it may require additional configuration and setup compared to OpenAPI Specification.

  6. Vendor Lock-in: OpenAPI Specification is an open standard, backed by the OpenAPI Initiative, which includes major industry players. This ensures that the specification remains independent and prevents vendor lock-in. Postman, on the other hand, is a proprietary tool developed by a single company. While it provides a lot of features, relying heavily on Postman may result in vendor lock-in.

**In Summary, OpenAPI Specification and Postman differ in terms of language support, API documentation capabilities, collaboration features, API testing and mocking capabilities, integration with development workflows, and possible vendor lock-in.

Advice on OpenAPI Specification and Postman
Needs advice
on
PostmanPostmanApiaryApiary
and
Swagger UISwagger UI

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

See more
Replies (3)
Jagdeep Singh
Tech Lead at ucreate.it · | 8 upvotes · 374.8K views

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

See more

I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.

See more
Sadik Ay
Recommends
on
PostmanPostman

I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.

See more
Decisions about OpenAPI Specification and Postman
Stephen Fox
Artificial Intelligence Fellow · | 1 upvote · 331.6K views

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of OpenAPI Specification
Pros of Postman
  • 5
    API Documentation
  • 5
    API Specification
  • 490
    Easy to use
  • 369
    Great tool
  • 276
    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
  • 156
    Easy setup, looks good
  • 144
    The best api workflow out there
  • 53
    It's the best
  • 53
    History feature
  • 44
    Adds real value to my workflow
  • 43
    Great interface that magically predicts your needs
  • 35
    The best in class app
  • 12
    Can save and share script
  • 10
    Fully featured without looking cluttered
  • 8
    Collections
  • 8
    Option to run scrips
  • 8
    Global/Environment Variables
  • 7
    Shareable Collections
  • 7
    Dead simple and useful. Excellent
  • 7
    Dark theme easy on the eyes
  • 6
    Awesome customer support
  • 6
    Great integration with newman
  • 5
    Documentation
  • 5
    Simple
  • 5
    The test script is useful
  • 4
    Saves responses
  • 4
    This has simplified my testing significantly
  • 4
    Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
  • 4
    Easy as pie
  • 3
    API-network
  • 3
    I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
  • 3
    Mocking API calls with predefined response
  • 2
    Now supports GraphQL
  • 2
    Postman Runner CI Integration
  • 2
    Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
  • 2
    Continuous integration using newman
  • 2
    Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
  • 2
    Runner
  • 2
    Graph
  • 1
    <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of OpenAPI Specification
Cons of Postman
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 10
      Stores credentials in HTTP
    • 9
      Bloated features and UI
    • 8
      Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
    • 7
      Poor GraphQL support
    • 5
      Expensive
    • 3
      Not free after 5 users
    • 3
      Can't prompt for per-request variables
    • 1
      Import swagger
    • 1
      Support websocket
    • 1
      Import curl

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    No Stats

    What is OpenAPI Specification?

    It defines a standard, language-agnostic interface to RESTful APIs which allows both humans and computers to discover and understand the capabilities of the service without access to source code, documentation, or through network traffic inspection.

    What is Postman?

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use OpenAPI Specification?
    What companies use Postman?
    See which teams inside your own company are using OpenAPI Specification or Postman.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with OpenAPI Specification?
    What tools integrate with Postman?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to OpenAPI Specification and Postman?
    RAML
    RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.
    OpenAPI
    It is a publicly available application programming interface that provides developers with programmatic access to a proprietary software application or web service.
    Insomnia REST Client
    Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.
    RestSharp
    It is probably the most popular HTTP client library for .NET. Featuring automatic serialization and deserialization, request and response type detection, variety of authentications and other useful features
    Retrofit
    Retrofit turns your HTTP API into a Java interface
    See all alternatives