StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. Octopus Deploy vs Terraform

Octopus Deploy vs Terraform

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Terraform
Terraform
Stacks22.9K
Followers14.7K
Votes344
GitHub Stars47.0K
Forks10.1K
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Stacks407
Followers493
Votes118

Octopus Deploy vs Terraform: What are the differences?

Introduction

Octopus Deploy and Terraform are two popular deployment tools used in the software development industry. Both of them serve the purpose of automating the deployment process, but they differ in their approach and functionality. In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Octopus Deploy and Terraform.

1. Deployment Process

Octopus Deploy focuses on simplifying the deployment process by providing a user-friendly interface and predefined steps for deploying applications. It allows users to create and manage deployment projects, which include the necessary steps for deploying software. On the other hand, Terraform takes a different approach by providing infrastructure as code. It focuses on building, changing, and managing infrastructure resources using declarative configuration files.

2. Scope of Deployment

Octopus Deploy is primarily designed for application deployment, with features like deploying software packages, configuring settings, and executing scripts. It provides granular control over the deployment process, allowing users to target specific environments and servers. Terraform, on the other hand, is more focused on infrastructure deployment. It allows users to define and provision infrastructure resources, such as virtual machines, networks, and storage, across multiple cloud platforms.

3. Supported Cloud Platforms

Octopus Deploy works with a wide range of cloud platforms, including public clouds like Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud, as well as private clouds and on-premises infrastructure. It provides built-in integration and support for various cloud-specific deployment tasks. In contrast, Terraform supports a larger number of cloud platforms and services. It offers a unified way to provision resources across different cloud providers, making it easier to manage a multi-cloud or hybrid cloud environment.

4. Configuration Management

Octopus Deploy provides basic configuration management capabilities through the use of variables, step templates, and configuration files. It allows users to define and manage configuration settings specific to each environment or deployment target. Terraform, on the other hand, focuses on infrastructure provisioning rather than configuration management. It integrates with other configuration management tools like Chef, Puppet, or Ansible to handle application configuration and management.

5. Infrastructure as Code

Terraform excels in the concept of infrastructure as code. It allows users to define and manage their infrastructure using declarative configuration files. This approach offers several benefits, including version control, reproducibility, and the ability to automate infrastructure changes. Octopus Deploy, although it supports some aspects of infrastructure as code through step templates and deployment processes, does not provide the same level of control and flexibility as Terraform.

6. Integration with CI/CD Pipelines

Both Octopus Deploy and Terraform can be integrated with CI/CD pipelines to automate the deployment process. Octopus Deploy provides native support for popular CI/CD platforms like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Azure DevOps, making it easier to incorporate deployment tasks into the pipeline. Terraform, on the other hand, can be seamlessly integrated into CI/CD pipelines using its command-line interface or through plugins and extensions available for popular CI/CD platforms.

In summary, the key differences between Octopus Deploy and Terraform can be summarized as follows: Octopus Deploy focuses on simplifying the application deployment process with a user-friendly interface, while Terraform focuses on infrastructure provisioning using declarative configuration. Octopus Deploy supports a wide range of cloud platforms, but Terraform supports a larger number of platforms and offers multi-cloud capabilities. Octopus Deploy provides basic configuration management, while Terraform integrates with other configuration management tools. Terraform emphasizes infrastructure as code, providing more control and flexibility in managing infrastructure resources. Both tools can be integrated with CI/CD pipelines, but Octopus Deploy has native support for popular CI/CD platforms, while Terraform can be integrated using its command-line interface and plugins/extensions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Terraform, Octopus Deploy

Sung Won
Sung Won

Nov 4, 2019

DecidedonGoogle Cloud IoT CoreGoogle Cloud IoT CoreTerraformTerraformPythonPython

Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

Check out the GitHub repo attached

2.25M views2.25M
Comments
Timothy
Timothy

SRE

Mar 20, 2020

Decided

I personally am not a huge fan of vendor lock in for multiple reasons:

  • I've seen cost saving moves to the cloud end up costing a fortune and trapping companies due to over utilization of cloud specific features.
  • I've seen S3 failures nearly take down half the internet.
  • I've seen companies get stuck in the cloud because they aren't built cloud agnostic.

I choose to use terraform for my cloud provisioning for these reasons:

  • It's cloud agnostic so I can use it no matter where I am.
  • It isn't difficult to use and uses a relatively easy to read language.
  • It tests infrastructure before running it, and enables me to see and keep changes up to date.
  • It runs from the same CLI I do most of my CM work from.
385k views385k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

May 4, 2020

Decided

Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.

426k views426k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Terraform
Terraform
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Infrastructure as Code: Infrastructure is described using a high-level configuration syntax. This allows a blueprint of your datacenter to be versioned and treated as you would any other code. Additionally, infrastructure can be shared and re-used.;Execution Plans: Terraform has a "planning" step where it generates an execution plan. The execution plan shows what Terraform will do when you call apply. This lets you avoid any surprises when Terraform manipulates infrastructure.;Resource Graph: Terraform builds a graph of all your resources, and parallelizes the creation and modification of any non-dependent resources. Because of this, Terraform builds infrastructure as efficiently as possible, and operators get insight into dependencies in their infrastructure.;Change Automation: Complex changesets can be applied to your infrastructure with minimal human interaction. With the previously mentioned execution plan and resource graph, you know exactly what Terraform will change and in what order, avoiding many possible human errors
Deploy on-premises or to the cloud, securely;.NET, Java, PHP, Node, Ruby;Full API support;Approvals and manual intervention;Enable self-service deployments;Installs in minutes;Integrates with your build server;Free for small teams
Statistics
GitHub Stars
47.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
10.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
22.9K
Stacks
407
Followers
14.7K
Followers
493
Votes
344
Votes
118
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 121
    Infrastructure as code
  • 73
    Declarative syntax
  • 45
    Planning
  • 28
    Simple
  • 24
    Parallelism
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't have full support to GKE
Pros
  • 30
    Powerful
  • 25
    Simplicity
  • 20
    Easy to learn
  • 17
    .Net oriented
  • 14
    Easy to manage releases and rollback
Cons
  • 4
    Poor UI
  • 2
    Management of Config
  • 2
    Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)
Integrations
Heroku
Heroku
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
DNSimple
DNSimple
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Consul
Consul
Equinix Metal
Equinix Metal
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
OpenStack
OpenStack
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Jenkins
Jenkins
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jira
Jira
Appveyor
Appveyor
Bamboo
Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Terraform, Octopus Deploy?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.

Distelli

Distelli

Build, test, and deploy your code from GitHub and BitBucket (or no repository at all) to any server in the world regardless of provider. Distelli customers iterate and ship faster with complete transparency.

cPanel

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana