Nuxt.js vs Vue Router

Overview

Vue Router

Stacks313

Followers231

Votes0

GitHub Stars19.0K

Forks5.0K

Nuxt.js

Stacks2.0K

Followers1.7K

Votes372

Nuxt.js vs Vue Router: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Nuxt.js and Vue Router

Nuxt.js and Vue Router are two popular frameworks for building single-page applications using Vue.js. While they share some similarities in terms of their abilities to handle routing, there are key differences between the two. Here are the six main differences:

Server-Side Rendering: Nuxt.js is a framework built on top of Vue.js that provides server-side rendering out of the box. This means that Nuxt.js applications can generate fully-rendered HTML on the server and send it to the client, resulting in faster initial page load times and improved search engine optimization (SEO). On the other hand, Vue Router is primarily focused on client-side rendering, where the HTML is rendered on the client's browser after loading initial JavaScript.
File-Based Routing: Nuxt.js uses a file-based routing system, where routes are automatically generated based on the files and folders structure in the project directory. This allows developers to create nested routes by organizing the files and folders accordingly, making it easier to manage and scale the application. Vue Router, on the other hand, requires manual configuration of routes using a router.js file, which can be more flexible but may require additional setup.
Automatic Code Splitting: Nuxt.js automatically splits the JavaScript code into smaller chunks based on the routes, resulting in smaller initial bundle sizes for each page. This helps to improve the performance of the application by reducing load times and optimizing resource usage. Vue Router, on the other hand, does not have built-in code splitting capabilities and requires manual configuration or additional tools to achieve similar optimizations.
Static Site Generation: Nuxt.js supports static site generation, which allows you to pre-render your application into static HTML files that can be served directly from a CDN or a static file server. This is useful for websites that have mostly static content and do not require real-time interactivity. Vue Router, on the other hand, focuses on client-side rendering and does not provide built-in support for static site generation.
Integrated Vuex Store: Nuxt.js integrates seamlessly with Vuex, the official state management library for Vue.js. This allows developers to easily manage the state of their applications and share data between components. Vue Router, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for state management and requires additional setup or third-party libraries to achieve similar functionality.
Code Organization and Project Structure: Nuxt.js enforces a specific project structure and organization, which can be helpful for large-scale applications that require a standardized approach. It provides clear guidelines on where to put components, pages, and other assets, making it easier for developers to navigate and understand the codebase. Vue Router, on the other hand, provides more flexibility in terms of project structure, allowing developers to organize their files and folders in a way that suits their specific needs and preferences.

In summary, Nuxt.js and Vue Router are both powerful frameworks for building single-page applications with Vue.js. However, Nuxt.js stands out with its built-in server-side rendering, file-based routing, automatic code splitting, static site generation support, integrated Vuex store, and enforced code organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Vue Router, Nuxt.js

Darren

Nov 30, 2019

Needs advice

Has anyone ever used vue-http-loader in large production apps? I’m in a situation where I can’t bundle code under any circumstances. So, no webpack, no gulp, no nothing. I am using vue-template-compiler and vue-ssr-renderer on the server-side and now I’m stuck trying to figure out the best way to hydrate the rendered content on the client-side. I appreciate any advice in advance.

703 views703

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Vue Router	Nuxt.js
It is the official router for Vue.js. It deeply integrates with Vue.js core to make building Single Page Applications with Vue.js a breeze.	Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.
-	Automatic transpilation and bundling; Hot module replacement; Server-side rendering OR Single Page App OR Static Generated, you choose 🔥; Static file serving; Configurable with a nuxt.config.js file; Custom layouts with the layouts/ directory; Middleware; Code splitting for every pages
Statistics
GitHub Stars 19.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 5.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 313	Stacks 2.0K
Followers 231	Followers 1.7K
Votes 0	Votes 372
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 62 SSR 47 Automatic routes 33 Middleware 29 Hot code reloading 22 Easy setup, easy to use, great community, FRENCH TOUCH

What are some alternatives to Vue Router, Nuxt.js?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Nuxt.js vs Vue Router: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Nuxt.js and Vue Router

Server-Side Rendering: Nuxt.js is a framework built on top of Vue.js that provides server-side rendering out of the box. This means that Nuxt.js applications can generate fully-rendered HTML on the server and send it to the client, resulting in faster initial page load times and improved search engine optimization (SEO). On the other hand, Vue Router is primarily focused on client-side rendering, where the HTML is rendered on the client's browser after loading initial JavaScript.
File-Based Routing: Nuxt.js uses a file-based routing system, where routes are automatically generated based on the files and folders structure in the project directory. This allows developers to create nested routes by organizing the files and folders accordingly, making it easier to manage and scale the application. Vue Router, on the other hand, requires manual configuration of routes using a router.js file, which can be more flexible but may require additional setup.
Automatic Code Splitting: Nuxt.js automatically splits the JavaScript code into smaller chunks based on the routes, resulting in smaller initial bundle sizes for each page. This helps to improve the performance of the application by reducing load times and optimizing resource usage. Vue Router, on the other hand, does not have built-in code splitting capabilities and requires manual configuration or additional tools to achieve similar optimizations.
Static Site Generation: Nuxt.js supports static site generation, which allows you to pre-render your application into static HTML files that can be served directly from a CDN or a static file server. This is useful for websites that have mostly static content and do not require real-time interactivity. Vue Router, on the other hand, focuses on client-side rendering and does not provide built-in support for static site generation.
Integrated Vuex Store: Nuxt.js integrates seamlessly with Vuex, the official state management library for Vue.js. This allows developers to easily manage the state of their applications and share data between components. Vue Router, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for state management and requires additional setup or third-party libraries to achieve similar functionality.
Code Organization and Project Structure: Nuxt.js enforces a specific project structure and organization, which can be helpful for large-scale applications that require a standardized approach. It provides clear guidelines on where to put components, pages, and other assets, making it easier for developers to navigate and understand the codebase. Vue Router, on the other hand, provides more flexibility in terms of project structure, allowing developers to organize their files and folders in a way that suits their specific needs and preferences.

Nuxt.js vs Vue Router

Overview

Nuxt.js vs Vue Router: What are the differences?