Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Nightmare.js

11
26
+ 1
0
Puppeteer

643
579
+ 1
26
Add tool

Nightmare.js vs Puppeteer: What are the differences?

Introduction Here are the key differences between Nightmare.js and Puppeteer, two popular web automation frameworks.

  1. Execution Environment: Nightmare.js runs on top of Electron, a framework that allows building cross-platform desktop applications using web technologies. Puppeteer, on the other hand, is a Node.js library that controls a headless version of Chromium. This means that Puppeteer can be used on various platforms without the need for installing a separate runtime environment like Electron.

  2. API Design: Nightmare.js focuses on providing a high-level API that abstracts away low-level details, making it easier for beginners to use. It aims for a more declarative syntax, allowing users to chain actions in a more readable and fluent manner. Puppeteer, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive and flexible API, exposing lower-level functions and options for fine-grained control over web automation tasks.

  3. Concurrent Operations: Puppeteer has built-in support for executing multiple tasks concurrently, allowing for more efficient and faster automation. Nightmare.js, on the other hand, runs each task in a sequential manner, which can result in slower execution if there are dependencies between different tasks.

  4. Documentation and Community: Puppeteer is backed by Google, and hence, it has extensive documentation and a large and active community. This means that finding resources, examples, and support is relatively easier with Puppeteer compared to Nightmare.js. Nightmare.js, on the other hand, has a smaller community and a narrower scope of use cases.

  5. Browser Events and Manipulation: Puppeteer provides more extensive control over events and user interactions on a webpage. It allows triggering mouse events, keyboard inputs, and user gestures like scrolling and zooming. Nightmare.js, while also supporting these interactions, may have limitations and may not provide the same level of control for complex user interactions.

  6. Extensibility and Customization: Puppeteer offers more options for extending and customizing its functionality. It allows users to modify the behavior of the browser, intercept network requests, and use Chrome DevTools Protocol directly. Nightmare.js, while providing some extensibility options, may have more limited possibilities for advanced customization.

In summary, while both Nightmare.js and Puppeteer are capable web automation frameworks, Puppeteer offers a more versatile and flexible API, better documentations and larger community support, support for concurrent operations, extensive browser events and manipulation control, and more options for customization.

Advice on Nightmare.js and Puppeteer
Ankur Loriya
Needs advice
on
PhantomJSPhantomJS
and
PuppeteerPuppeteer

I am using Node 12 for server scripting and have a function to generate PDF and send it to a browser. Currently, we are using PhantomJS to generate a PDF. Some web post shows that we can achieve PDF generation using Puppeteer. I was a bit confused. Should we move to puppeteerJS? Which one is better with NodeJS for generating PDF?

See more
Replies (2)
Recommends
on
PuppeteerPuppeteer

You better go with puppeteer. It is basically chrome automation tool, written in nodejs. So what you get is PDF, generated by chrome itself. I guess there is hardly better PDF generation tool for the web. Phantomjs is already more or less outdated as technology. It uses some old webkit port that's quite behind in terms of standards and features. It can be replaced with puppeteer for every single task.

See more
Recommends
on
PuppeteerPuppeteer

I suggest puppeteer to go for. It is simple and easy to set up. Only limitaiton is it can be used only for chrome browser and currently they are looking into expanding into FF. The next thing is Playwright which is just a scale up of Puppeteer. It supports cross browsers.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Nightmare.js
Pros of Puppeteer
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 10
      Very well documented
    • 10
      Scriptable web browser
    • 6
      Promise based

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Nightmare.js
    Cons of Puppeteer
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 10
        Chrome only

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Nightmare.js?

      It is a high-level browser automation library. It lets you simplify deeply nested callbacks into a few sequential statements. Its goal is to expose a few simple methods that mimic user actions.

      What is Puppeteer?

      Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Nightmare.js?
      What companies use Puppeteer?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Nightmare.js?
      What tools integrate with Puppeteer?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to Nightmare.js and Puppeteer?
      PhantomJS
      PhantomJS is a headless WebKit scriptable with JavaScript. It is used by hundreds of developers and dozens of organizations for web-related development workflow.
      jQuery
      jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.
      React
      Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
      AngularJS
      AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.
      Vue.js
      It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.
      See all alternatives