Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Tomcat vs Passenger vs nginx: What are the differences?
Introduction:
When comparing Apache Tomcat, Passenger, and Nginx, there are several key differences that impact their functionality and performance. Understanding these differences can help in determining which server software best suits your specific needs.
1. Scalability: Apache Tomcat is a versatile servlet container that can handle Java applications with moderate traffic, whereas Nginx is a high-performance web server that excels in serving static content and acting as a reverse proxy. Passenger sits between the two, offering seamless integration with Nginx while also being capable of managing Ruby, Python, and Node.js applications. This makes Passenger more suitable for handling a wider range of applications and scaling up as needed.
2. Configuration: Apache Tomcat relies heavily on XML-based configuration files, which can sometimes be complex and cumbersome for developers to manage. On the other hand, Nginx uses a modular and declarative configuration format that is simpler and easier to understand. Passenger mixes the best of both worlds by offering a combination of configuration options that are both flexible and user-friendly.
3. Performance: Nginx is known for its high performance and efficiency when handling large numbers of concurrent connections, making it a popular choice for high-traffic websites. Passenger complements Nginx by providing intelligent process management and load balancing capabilities, further enhancing performance. While Apache Tomcat is reliable and stable, it may not match the raw speed and efficiency of Nginx and Passenger in certain scenarios.
4. Language Support: Apache Tomcat is primarily designed for Java applications, making it a preferred choice for Java developers. Nginx, on the other hand, supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, making it versatile for handling diverse web applications. Passenger stands out by offering native support for Ruby on Rails and other popular web development technologies, catering to a specific set of developers.
5. Community Support: The Apache Tomcat community is well-established and has a wealth of resources available for developers, making it easy to troubleshoot issues and find solutions. Nginx also boasts a strong community that actively contributes to its development, providing ongoing support and updates. Passenger, being a newer player in the field, may not have the same level of community support as Tomcat and Nginx.
6. Deployment Flexibility: Nginx is widely used as a reverse proxy server due to its ability to efficiently handle incoming traffic and distribute it to backend servers. Passenger seamlessly integrates with Nginx, offering a robust solution for deploying and scaling web applications. Apache Tomcat, while capable of serving Java applications, may not offer the same level of flexibility and ease of deployment as Nginx and Passenger.
In Summary, understanding the distinctions between Apache Tomcat, Passenger, and Nginx can help in selecting the most suitable server software based on specific requirements and desired functionality.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."
I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.
I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure
I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works
For us, NGINX is a lite HTTP server easy to configure. On our research, we found a well-documented software we a lot of support from the community.
We have been using it alongside tools like certbot and it has been a total success.
We can easily configure our sites and have a folder for available vs enabled sites, and with the nginx -t command we can easily check everything is running fine.
- Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
- The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
- The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
- PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to 1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly. 2. Install apache and tomcat. 3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server. 4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports. 5. Create users on RHEL for application support team. 6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.
I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.
Pros of NGINX
- High-performance http server1.4K
- Performance893
- Easy to configure730
- Open source607
- Load balancer530
- Free289
- Scalability288
- Web server226
- Simplicity175
- Easy setup136
- Content caching30
- Web Accelerator21
- Capability15
- Fast14
- High-latency12
- Predictability12
- Reverse Proxy8
- The best of them7
- Supports http/27
- Great Community5
- Lots of Modules5
- Enterprise version5
- High perfomance proxy server4
- Embedded Lua scripting3
- Streaming media delivery3
- Streaming media3
- Reversy Proxy3
- Blash2
- GRPC-Web2
- Lightweight2
- Fast and easy to set up2
- Slim2
- saltstack2
- Virtual hosting1
- Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast1
- Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior1
- Ingress controller1
Pros of Passenger
- Nginx integration43
- Great for rails36
- Fast web server21
- Free19
- Lightweight15
- Scalable14
- Rolling restarts13
- Multithreading10
- Out-of-process architecture9
- Low-bandwidth6
- Virtually infinitely scalable2
- Deployment error resistance2
- Mass deployment2
- High-latency2
- Many of its good features are only enterprise level1
- Apache integration1
- Secure1
- Asynchronous I/O1
- Multiple programming language support1
Pros of Apache Tomcat
- Easy79
- Java72
- Popular49
- Spring web1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of NGINX
- Advanced features require subscription10
Cons of Passenger
- Cost (some features require paid/pro)0
Cons of Apache Tomcat
- Blocking - each http request block a thread2
- Easy to set up1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is NGINX?
What is Passenger?
What is Apache Tomcat?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Passenger?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+12
+17
+22
+31+46+15
+6+9