Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
nginx vs OpenResty: What are the differences?
nginx: A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet. nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018; OpenResty: Turning Nginx into a Full-fledged Web App Server. OpenResty (aka. ngx_openresty) is a full-fledged web application server by bundling the standard Nginx core, lots of 3rd-party Nginx modules, as well as most of their external dependencies.
nginx and OpenResty can be categorized as "Web Servers" tools.
nginx and OpenResty are both open source tools. It seems that nginx with 9.1K GitHub stars and 3.43K forks on GitHub has more adoption than OpenResty with 7.12K GitHub stars and 984 GitHub forks.
Airbnb, Uber Technologies, and Spotify are some of the popular companies that use nginx, whereas OpenResty is used by Shopify, Kong, and Pagar.me. nginx has a broader approval, being mentioned in 8670 company stacks & 2556 developers stacks; compared to OpenResty, which is listed in 37 company stacks and 5 developer stacks.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."
I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.
I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure
I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works
- Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
- The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
- The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
- PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
Pros of NGINX
- High-performance http server1.4K
- Performance896
- Easy to configure728
- Open source606
- Load balancer529
- Scalability286
- Free285
- Web server222
- Simplicity173
- Easy setup134
- Content caching29
- Web Accelerator19
- Capability14
- Fast13
- Predictability11
- High-latency10
- Reverse Proxy7
- Supports http/26
- Fast and lightweight6
- Enterprise version4
- Great Community4
- The best of them4
- Lots of Modules4
- Streaming media3
- Embedded Lua scripting3
- Reversy Proxy3
- Streaming media delivery3
- High perfomance proxy server3
- Lightweight2
- Slim2
- saltstack2
- Fast and easy to set up2
- Blash1
- GRPC-Web1
- Ingress controller1
- Virtual hosting1
- Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast1
- Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior1
- A0
Pros of OpenResty
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of NGINX
- Advanced features require subscription8