StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Server Interface
  5. NGINX Unit vs uWSGI

NGINX Unit vs uWSGI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

uWSGI
uWSGI
Stacks424
Followers311
Votes12
GitHub Stars3.5K
Forks699
NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit
Stacks86
Followers199
Votes11
GitHub Stars5.6K
Forks365

NGINX Unit vs uWSGI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between NGINX Unit and uWSGI. NGINX Unit and uWSGI are both web application servers that can be used to deploy and manage web applications. However, they differ in several aspects that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Architecture: NGINX Unit is designed as a modern, lightweight, and dynamic application server. It follows a modular architecture where individual components can be loaded and unloaded at runtime without restarting the server. On the other hand, uWSGI is a full-featured application server that supports multiple protocols, including WSGI, FastCGI, and HTTP. It has a more monolithic architecture with all features bundled into a single server binary.

  2. Language Support: NGINX Unit offers native support for multiple languages, including Python, PHP, Go, Java, Perl, and Ruby. It allows developers to deploy applications written in different languages concurrently within the same server. uWSGI also supports multiple languages but requires separate configuration and processes for each language, leading to a more complex setup.

  3. Configuration: NGINX Unit provides a flexible, JSON-based configuration system that allows administrators to configure applications, listeners, routers, and other components using a structured format. This makes it easier to manage and automate the deployment of applications. uWSGI, on the other hand, relies on a traditional ini-style configuration file, which may be more familiar to some administrators but can be less intuitive for others.

  4. Performance: NGINX Unit is known for its high performance and low resource consumption. It has a small memory footprint and is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. uWSGI also offers good performance but may consume more system resources compared to NGINX Unit due to its more feature-rich architecture.

  5. Ease of Use: NGINX Unit aims to provide a simple and user-friendly experience for developers and administrators. It offers a RESTful API to manage applications and provides a built-in dynamic configuration system that can be updated without server restarts. uWSGI, while powerful, may require more manual configuration and management, especially when dealing with multiple languages or complex application setups.

  6. Community and Support: NGINX Unit is a relatively newer project compared to uWSGI but has gained popularity and has an active community. It benefits from being backed by NGINX, a well-established and widely used web server. uWSGI, on the other hand, has been around for a longer time, has a larger user base, and has been extensively tested and used in production environments.

In Summary, NGINX Unit and uWSGI differ in terms of architecture, language support, configuration, performance, ease of use, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

uWSGI
uWSGI
NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit

The uWSGI project aims at developing a full stack for building hosting services.

NGINX Unit is a dynamic web application server, designed to run applications in multiple languages. Unit is lightweight, polyglot, and dynamically configured via API. The design of the server allows reconfiguration of specific application parameters as needed by the engineering or operations.

-
Fully dynamic reconfiguration using RESTful JSON API;Multiple application languages and versions can run simultaneously;Dynamic application processes management (coming soon);TLS support (coming soon);TCP, HTTP, HTTPS, HTTP/2 routing and proxying (coming soon)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.5K
GitHub Stars
5.6K
GitHub Forks
699
GitHub Forks
365
Stacks
424
Stacks
86
Followers
311
Followers
199
Votes
12
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Faster
  • 4
    Simple
  • 2
    Powerful
Pros
  • 3
    PHP
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Multilang
  • 2
    Python
  • 1
    Node.js
Integrations
Python
Python
Perl
Perl
Ruby
Ruby
Perl
Perl
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to uWSGI, NGINX Unit?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase