Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Next.js vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?
- Server-side vs Client-side rendering: Next.js is a framework for server-side rendering (SSR) while Spring MVC is primarily used for client-side rendering. With Next.js, the server sends fully rendered HTML pages to the client, resulting in faster initial page load times and improved SEO. On the other hand, Spring MVC relies on the client's web browser to render the HTML pages, which can be slower for the initial load and may have SEO implications.
- JavaScript vs Java: Next.js is built using JavaScript, while Spring MVC is based on Java. This difference in programming language affects the development ecosystem, tooling, and community support available for each framework. Developers with a stronger background in JavaScript might find Next.js more familiar and easier to work with, while those experienced in Java may prefer Spring MVC.
- Front-end Framework Integration: Next.js has built-in support for popular front-end frameworks like React, allowing developers to easily build complex user interfaces using these frameworks. Spring MVC, on the other hand, is not tightly coupled with any specific front-end framework, giving developers the flexibility to choose their preferred tools and libraries for building the front-end.
- Serverless Deployment: Next.js can be easily deployed on serverless platforms like Vercel, which automatically handles scaling and infrastructure management. This makes it easier to deploy and scale Next.js applications without worrying about managing servers or infrastructure. Spring MVC, on the other hand, typically requires manual setup and configuration on server infrastructure.
- API Design: Spring MVC provides rich support for building RESTful APIs using the Spring framework, making it a popular choice for developing API-centric applications. Next.js, on the other hand, is more focused on server-side rendering and client-side applications, and may not provide the same level of built-in API development features as Spring MVC.
- Development Philosophy: Next.js follows a more modern and opinionated development philosophy, with a focus on simplicity, ease of use, and developer experience. Spring MVC, on the other hand, follows a more traditional and flexible approach, offering a wide range of features and configurations for developers who prefer more control over the application's behavior.
In Summary, Next.js and Spring MVC differ in their rendering approaches, programming languages, front-end framework integrations, deployment options, API design capabilities, and development philosophies.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting49
- Built with React43
- Easy setup33
- TypeScript26
- Universal JavaScript24
- Zero setup22
- Static site generator21
- Simple deployment12
- Just JavaScript12
- Incremental static regeneration12
- Filesystem as an API10
- Frictionless development10
- Everything is a function9
- Well Documented9
- Has many examples and integrations8
- Testing8
- Isomorphic React applications7
- File based routing + hooks built in4
- Deployment2
- SEO1
Pros of Spring MVC
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)9