Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Next.js vs Nuxt: What are the differences?
Developers describe Next.js as "A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps *". Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications. On the other hand, *Nuxt** is detailed as "The Vue.js Framework". Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more..
Next.js and Nuxt are primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" and "Front-End Frameworks" tools respectively.
Some of the features offered by Next.js are:
- Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API
- Only JavaScript. Everything is a function
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting
On the other hand, Nuxt provides the following key features:
- Automatic transpilation and bundling
- Hot module replacement
- Server-side rendering OR Single Page App OR Static Generated, you choose 🔥
"Automatic server rendering and code splitting" is the top reason why over 9 developers like Next.js, while over 12 developers mention "SSR" as the leading cause for choosing Nuxt.
Next.js is an open source tool with 38.7K GitHub stars and 4.7K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Next.js's open source repository on GitHub.
CircleCI, Avocode, and SeatGeek are some of the popular companies that use Next.js, whereas Nuxt is used by Bitupper, Quero Education, and Compile Inc. Next.js has a broader approval, being mentioned in 82 company stacks & 69 developers stacks; compared to Nuxt, which is listed in 51 company stacks and 52 developer stacks.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting47
- Built with React42
- Easy setup33
- Universal JavaScript24
- TypeScript24
- Zero setup22
- Static site generator20
- Incremental static regeneration12
- Simple deployment12
- Just JavaScript11
- Frictionless development10
- Filesystem as an API10
- Well Documented9
- Everything is a function9
- Has many examples and integrations8
- Testing8
- Isomorphic React applications7
- File based routing + hooks built in4
- Deployment2
- SEO1
Pros of Nuxt.js
- SSR58
- Automatic routes46
- Middleware30
- Hot code reloading27
- Easy setup, easy to use, great community, FRENCH TOUCH21
- Static Websites20
- SPA20
- Code splitting for every page19
- Plugins19
- Custom layouts17
- Automatic transpilation and bundling (with webpack and14
- Modules ecosystem12
- Easy setup12
- Amazing Developer Experience10
- Vibrant and helpful community10
- Pages directory10
- Its Great for Team Development5
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)9