Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Next.js vs Nuxt: What are the differences?
Developers describe Next.js as "A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps *". Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications. On the other hand, *Nuxt** is detailed as "The Vue.js Framework". Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more..
Next.js and Nuxt are primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" and "Front-End Frameworks" tools respectively.
Some of the features offered by Next.js are:
- Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API
- Only JavaScript. Everything is a function
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting
On the other hand, Nuxt provides the following key features:
- Automatic transpilation and bundling
- Hot module replacement
- Server-side rendering OR Single Page App OR Static Generated, you choose 🔥
"Automatic server rendering and code splitting" is the top reason why over 9 developers like Next.js, while over 12 developers mention "SSR" as the leading cause for choosing Nuxt.
Next.js is an open source tool with 38.7K GitHub stars and 4.7K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Next.js's open source repository on GitHub.
CircleCI, Avocode, and SeatGeek are some of the popular companies that use Next.js, whereas Nuxt is used by Bitupper, Quero Education, and Compile Inc. Next.js has a broader approval, being mentioned in 82 company stacks & 69 developers stacks; compared to Nuxt, which is listed in 51 company stacks and 52 developer stacks.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting26
- Built with React20
- Easy setup18
- Zero setup16
- Universal JavaScript15
- TypeScript11
- Static site generator7
- Simple deployment6
- Frictionless development6
- Just JavaScript5
- Incremental static regeneration5
- Filesystem as an API5
- Testing4
- Everything is a function4
- Isomorphic React applications4
- Well Documented3
- Has many examples and integrations2
Pros of Nuxt.js
- SSR35
- Automatic routes31
- Middleware19
- Hot code reloading18
- SPA15
- Static Websites15
- Easy setup, easy to use, great community, FRENCH TOUCH14
- Plugins13
- Code splitting for every page11
- Automatic transpilation and bundling (with webpack and9
- Custom layouts9
- Modules ecosystem7
- Easy setup6
- Vibrant and helpful community5
- Pages directory5
- Amazing Developer Experience4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)2