StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Graph Databases
  4. Graph Databases
  5. Neo4j vs Neptune

Neo4j vs Neptune

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Neo4j
Neo4j
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.4K
Votes351
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.5K
Neptune
Neptune
Stacks16
Followers38
Votes2

Neo4j vs Neptune: What are the differences?

Introduction

Neo4j and Neptune are both powerful graph databases used for storing and querying highly connected data. While they share some similarities, they also have several key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Query Language:

    • Neo4j uses a proprietary query language called Cypher, which is specifically designed for querying graph data. It provides a simple and expressive syntax for traversing and manipulating the graph.
    • Neptune, on the other hand, supports query languages like Gremlin and SPARQL. Gremlin is a flexible graph traversal language, while SPARQL is a standard query language for RDF data. This gives Neptune the ability to work with other RDF datasets.
  2. Architecture:

    • Neo4j is a native graph database, which means it is built from the ground up to efficiently store and process graph data. It uses a property graph model, where nodes represent entities and relationships represent connections between them.
    • Neptune, on the other hand, is based on a columnar storage engine that is optimized for handling large-scale graphs. It uses a property graph model as well, but stores data in a columnar format for better performance and efficient disk utilization.
  3. Scalability:

    • Neo4j is designed to be highly scalable and can handle large amounts of data and complex queries. It supports horizontal scaling by distributing the graph across multiple machines, allowing for high availability and fault tolerance.
    • Neptune is also designed for scalability and can handle massive datasets. It uses a storage and query architecture that allows it to scale horizontally and automatically replicate data across multiple availability zones.
  4. Deployment Options:

    • Neo4j offers both on-premises and cloud-based deployment options. It can be installed and run on a single machine or distributed across a cluster of machines.
    • Neptune is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It is only available as a cloud-based solution and is not available for on-premises deployment.
  5. Data Model:

    • Neo4j supports a flexible property graph model, where nodes can have properties and relationships can have properties as well. This allows for rich and complex data modeling.
    • Neptune also supports a property graph model, but it also has built-in support for RDF data. RDF is a standard model for representing and querying linked data, making Neptune suitable for applications that work with RDF datasets.
  6. Ecosystem and Community:

    • Neo4j has a mature ecosystem and a large and active community. It has a wide range of tools, libraries, and integrations that make it easy to develop and deploy graph-based applications. It also provides commercial support and training services.
    • Neptune is relatively newer compared to Neo4j, but it leverages the existing AWS ecosystem and infrastructure. It benefits from the scalability, security, and reliability provided by AWS and integrates well with other AWS services.

In summary, Neo4j and Neptune are both powerful graph databases, but they differ in terms of query language, architecture, scalability, deployment options, data model, and ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Neo4j
Neo4j
Neptune
Neptune

Neo4j stores data in nodes connected by directed, typed relationships with properties on both, also known as a Property Graph. It is a high performance graph store with all the features expected of a mature and robust database, like a friendly query language and ACID transactions.

It brings organization and collaboration to data science projects. All the experiement-related objects are backed-up and organized ready to be analyzed, reproduced and shared with others. Works with all common technologies and integrates with other tools.

intuitive, using a graph model for data representation;reliable, with full ACID transactions;durable and fast, using a custom disk-based, native storage engine;massively scalable, up to several billion nodes/relationships/properties;highly-available, when distributed across multiple machines;expressive, with a powerful, human readable graph query language;fast, with a powerful traversal framework for high-speed graph queries;embeddable, with a few small jars;simple, accessible by a convenient REST interface or an object-oriented Java API
Experiment tracking; Experiment versioning; Experiment comparison; Experiment monitoring; Experiment sharing; Notebook versioning
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
16
Followers
1.4K
Followers
38
Votes
351
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 69
    Cypher – graph query language
  • 61
    Great graphdb
  • 33
    Open source
  • 31
    Rest api
  • 27
    High-Performance Native API
Cons
  • 9
    Comparably slow
  • 4
    Can't store a vertex as JSON
  • 1
    Doesn't have a managed cloud service at low cost
Pros
  • 1
    Supports both gremlin and openCypher query languages
  • 1
    Aws managed services
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't have much support for openCypher clients
  • 1
    Doesn't have proper clients for different lanuages
  • 1
    Doesn't have much community support
Integrations
No integrations available
PyTorch
PyTorch
Keras
Keras
R Language
R Language
MLflow
MLflow
Matplotlib
Matplotlib

What are some alternatives to Neo4j, Neptune?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

PyTorch

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

Dgraph

Dgraph

Dgraph's goal is to provide Google production level scale and throughput, with low enough latency to be serving real time user queries, over terabytes of structured data. Dgraph supports GraphQL-like query syntax, and responds in JSON and Protocol Buffers over GRPC and HTTP.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase