Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Mozilla Brick vs Polymer: What are the differences?
Mozilla Brick: UI Components for Modern Web Apps. Brick is a collection of UI components designed for the easy and quick building of web application UIs. Brick components are built using the Web Components standard to allow developers to describe the UI of their app using the HTML syntax they already know; Polymer: A new library built on top of Web Components, designed to leverage the evolving web platform on modern browsers. Polymer is a new type of library for the web, designed to leverage the existing browser infrastructure to provide the encapsulation and extendability currently only available in JS libraries. Polymer is based on a set of future technologies, including Shadow DOM, Custom Elements and Model Driven Views. Currently these technologies are implemented as polyfills or shims, but as browsers adopt these features natively, the platform code that drives Polymer evacipates, leaving only the value-adds.
Mozilla Brick and Polymer can be categorized as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.
Mozilla Brick and Polymer are both open source tools. It seems that Polymer with 21.1K GitHub stars and 2K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Mozilla Brick with 3.05K GitHub stars and 229 GitHub forks.
Pros of Mozilla Brick
- Inovative1
Pros of Polymer
- Web components52
- Material design30
- HTML14
- Components13
- Open source5
- It uses the platform4
- Designer friendly. HTMLX concepts3
- Like the interesting naming convention for elements1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Mozilla Brick
Cons of Polymer
- Last version is like 2 years ago? that's totally rad1