StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. MongoDB vs Vertica

MongoDB vs Vertica

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MongoDB
MongoDB
Stacks96.6K
Followers82.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars27.7K
Forks5.7K
Vertica
Vertica
Stacks90
Followers120
Votes16

MongoDB vs Vertica: What are the differences?

Introduction

MongoDB and Vertica are two different database management systems that have distinct features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between these two systems is crucial for selecting the right one for specific use cases. Below are six key differences between MongoDB and Vertica:

  1. Data Model: MongoDB is a NoSQL database, which means it does not rely on a fixed schema and can store different types of data structures. It uses collections and documents to store data, allowing for flexible and dynamic data models. On the other hand, Vertica is a columnar analytical database that relies on a predefined schema and organizes data in columns. It is optimized for analytic workloads, especially for large-scale data analysis.

  2. Scalability: MongoDB is designed to be highly scalable and can handle large amounts of data by using sharding, a technique that distributes data across multiple servers. It allows for horizontal scaling, meaning you can add more servers to accommodate growing data and user loads. Vertica also supports scalability through horizontal scaling, but it is more focused on providing high-performance analytics on large datasets rather than general-purpose scalability.

  3. Data Storage: MongoDB stores data in a binary format called BSON (Binary JSON), which allows for efficient storage and retrieval of complex data structures like arrays and nested documents. It also supports automatic sharding and replication for high availability and fault tolerance. On the other hand, Vertica compresses data to reduce storage space and leverages columnar storage to improve query performance by only reading relevant columns.

  4. Querying and Indexing: MongoDB uses a flexible query language called MongoDB Query Language (MQL) to interact with the database. It supports rich query expressions, including regular expressions, geo-spatial queries, and aggregation pipelines. MongoDB indexes data based on the BSON document structure to optimize query performance. Vertica, on the other hand, supports standard SQL queries and provides advanced analytics capabilities through its SQL-MapReduce framework. It also utilizes different types of indexes, including projections and join indexes, to expedite query execution.

  5. Concurrency and Transactions: MongoDB provides a flexible locking mechanism called Multi-Version Concurrency Control (MVCC), which allows multiple read operations to occur simultaneously while maintaining data consistency. However, at the time of writing, it does not support multi-document transactions, which can be a limitation for complex data manipulations. In contrast, Vertica supports concurrent read and write operations and provides full ACID compliance, including the ability to handle multi-statement transactions.

  6. Use Cases: MongoDB is well-suited for use cases where flexibility, scalability, and real-time data processing are critical, such as content management systems, mobile applications, and real-time analytics. Vertica, on the other hand, excels in complex analytical workloads, where high-performance, advanced analytics, and ad-hoc querying are essential, such as business intelligence, data warehousing, and large-scale data analysis.

In summary, MongoDB is a NoSQL database with a flexible data model, high scalability, and real-time processing capabilities, while Vertica is a columnar analytical database optimized for high-performance analytics on large datasets, providing advanced analytics capabilities. The choice between these two systems depends on the specific requirements of the application or workload at hand.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MongoDB, Vertica

George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MongoDB
MongoDB
Vertica
Vertica

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

It provides a best-in-class, unified analytics platform that will forever be independent from underlying infrastructure.

Flexible data model, expressive query language, secondary indexes, replication, auto-sharding, in-place updates, aggregation, GridFS
Analyze All of Your Data. No longer move data or settle for siloed views;Achieve Scale and Performance;Fear of growing data volumes and users is a thing of the past;Future-Proof Your Analytics
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
96.6K
Stacks
90
Followers
82.0K
Followers
120
Votes
4.1K
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 829
    Document-oriented storage
  • 594
    No sql
  • 554
    Ease of use
  • 465
    Fast
  • 410
    High performance
Cons
  • 6
    Very slowly for connected models that require joins
  • 3
    Not acid compliant
  • 2
    Proprietary query language
Pros
  • 3
    Shared nothing or shared everything architecture
  • 1
    Freedom from Underlying Storage
  • 1
    Reduce costs as reduced hardware is required
  • 1
    Partition pruning and predicate push down on Parquet
  • 1
    Vertica is the only product which offers partition prun
Integrations
No integrations available
Oracle
Oracle
Golang
Golang
MySQL
MySQL
Sass
Sass
Mode
Mode
PowerBI
PowerBI
Tableau
Tableau
Talend
Talend

What are some alternatives to MongoDB, Vertica?

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase