MongoDB vs ReactiveMongo

Overview

MongoDB

Stacks96.6K

Followers82.0K

Votes4.1K

GitHub Stars27.7K

Forks5.7K

ReactiveMongo

Stacks22

Followers37

Votes0

GitHub Stars851

Forks231

MongoDB vs ReactiveMongo: What are the differences?

Introduction

This article will highlight the key differences between MongoDB and ReactiveMongo.

Native Language: MongoDB is written in C++, while ReactiveMongo is written in Scala. This difference in native language affects the performance and compatibility of the databases with different programming languages.
Reactive Programming: ReactiveMongo is designed to work with the reactive programming paradigm, which emphasizes asynchronous and non-blocking operations. On the other hand, while MongoDB does support asynchronous operations, it is not specifically designed for reactive programming.
Concurrency Model: ReactiveMongo uses an event-driven and non-blocking I/O model, which allows it to handle a large number of concurrent requests efficiently. MongoDB, on the other hand, uses a thread-based concurrency model, which may not be as efficient in handling high concurrency scenarios.
Integration with Reactive Streams: ReactiveMongo provides native integration with Reactive Streams, which is a standardized API for asynchronous stream processing with non-blocking back pressure. This allows ReactiveMongo to seamlessly integrate with reactive frameworks and libraries that support Reactive Streams. MongoDB, on the other hand, does not have native integration with Reactive Streams.
Backward Compatibility: MongoDB is known for its strong backward compatibility, which means that applications developed using an older version of MongoDB can usually be easily migrated to a newer version without major changes. ReactiveMongo, being a wrapper for MongoDB, may not provide the same level of backward compatibility as MongoDB itself.
Deployment Flexibility: MongoDB can be deployed as a standalone server, a replica set, or a sharded cluster, providing flexibility for different use cases and scalability needs. ReactiveMongo, being a driver for MongoDB, inherits this deployment flexibility and allows developers to leverage the full potential of MongoDB's deployment options.

In summary, the key differences between MongoDB and ReactiveMongo lie in their native language, the support for reactive programming, concurrency model, integration with Reactive Streams, backward compatibility, and deployment flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on MongoDB, ReactiveMongo

George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceon

PostgreSQL

Python

Django

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k

Comments

Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k

Comments

Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

MongoDB	ReactiveMongo
MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.	ReactiveMongo is designed to avoid any kind of blocking request. Every operation returns immediately, freeing the running thread and resuming execution when it is over. Accessing the database is not a bottleneck anymore.
Flexible data model, expressive query language, secondary indexes, replication, auto-sharding, in-place updates, aggregation, GridFS	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 27.7K	GitHub Stars 851
GitHub Forks 5.7K	GitHub Forks 231
Stacks 96.6K	Stacks 22
Followers 82.0K	Followers 37
Votes 4.1K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 829 Document-oriented storage 594 No sql 554 Ease of use 465 Fast 410 High performance Cons 6 Very slowly for connected models that require joins 3 Not acid compliant 2 Proprietary query language	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to MongoDB, ReactiveMongo?

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

dbForge Studio for MySQL

It is the universal MySQL and MariaDB client for database management, administration and development. With the help of this intelligent MySQL client the work with data and code has become easier and more convenient. This tool provides utilities to compare, synchronize, and backup MySQL databases with scheduling, and gives possibility to analyze and report MySQL tables data.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

dbForge Studio for Oracle

It is a powerful integrated development environment (IDE) which helps Oracle SQL developers to increase PL/SQL coding speed, provides versatile data editing tools for managing in-database and external data.

dbForge Studio for PostgreSQL

It is a GUI tool for database development and management. The IDE for PostgreSQL allows users to create, develop, and execute queries, edit and adjust the code to their requirements in a convenient and user-friendly interface.

Related Comparisons

MongoDB vs ReactiveMongo: What are the differences?

Introduction

This article will highlight the key differences between MongoDB and ReactiveMongo.

Native Language: MongoDB is written in C++, while ReactiveMongo is written in Scala. This difference in native language affects the performance and compatibility of the databases with different programming languages.
Reactive Programming: ReactiveMongo is designed to work with the reactive programming paradigm, which emphasizes asynchronous and non-blocking operations. On the other hand, while MongoDB does support asynchronous operations, it is not specifically designed for reactive programming.
Concurrency Model: ReactiveMongo uses an event-driven and non-blocking I/O model, which allows it to handle a large number of concurrent requests efficiently. MongoDB, on the other hand, uses a thread-based concurrency model, which may not be as efficient in handling high concurrency scenarios.
Integration with Reactive Streams: ReactiveMongo provides native integration with Reactive Streams, which is a standardized API for asynchronous stream processing with non-blocking back pressure. This allows ReactiveMongo to seamlessly integrate with reactive frameworks and libraries that support Reactive Streams. MongoDB, on the other hand, does not have native integration with Reactive Streams.
Backward Compatibility: MongoDB is known for its strong backward compatibility, which means that applications developed using an older version of MongoDB can usually be easily migrated to a newer version without major changes. ReactiveMongo, being a wrapper for MongoDB, may not provide the same level of backward compatibility as MongoDB itself.
Deployment Flexibility: MongoDB can be deployed as a standalone server, a replica set, or a sharded cluster, providing flexibility for different use cases and scalability needs. ReactiveMongo, being a driver for MongoDB, inherits this deployment flexibility and allows developers to leverage the full potential of MongoDB's deployment options.

MongoDB vs ReactiveMongo

Overview

MongoDB vs ReactiveMongo: What are the differences?