React vs momentjs

Overview

React

Stacks182.6K

Followers147.0K

Votes4.1K

GitHub Stars240.3K

Forks49.7K

Moment.js

Stacks7.4K

Followers297

Votes0

GitHub Stars48.1K

Forks7.0K

React vs momentjs: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between React and moment.js. React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces, while moment.js is a JavaScript date library for parsing, validating, manipulating, and displaying dates and times.

Rendering: React focuses on rendering user interfaces and updating only the necessary components when there are changes in the data. It uses a virtual DOM to efficiently and optimally update the UI. On the other hand, moment.js is primarily used for manipulating and formatting dates and does not offer any rendering capabilities.
Size: React is a fairly large library, with a size of around 100KB when minified and gzipped. This can impact the loading time of the website. On the other hand, moment.js is much smaller, with a size of around 16KB when minified and gzipped. Therefore, if the only requirement is date manipulation and formatting, using moment.js can be a more lightweight option.
Data binding: React provides a powerful and efficient way of binding data to UI components using its virtual DOM and one-way data flow. It allows for easy updating and synchronization of data between components. On the other hand, moment.js does not have any built-in data binding capabilities as it focuses solely on date manipulation and formatting.
Localization: React does not provide any built-in localization support for date and time formatting. However, it can be easily integrated with other libraries, including moment.js, to support localization. Moment.js, on the other hand, offers extensive support for localization and can easily handle date and time formatting in different languages and locales.
API and functionality: React provides a rich set of APIs and functionality for building user interfaces, including components, state management, and lifecycle methods. Moment.js, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive set of APIs and functionalities specifically designed for working with dates and times, such as parsing, formatting, manipulating, and validating dates.
Active development: React is actively developed and maintained by Facebook and a large community of contributors. It has a vibrant ecosystem with a wide range of community-driven libraries and tools. Moment.js, on the other hand, is not actively developed and its development has been put on hold. The moment.js team recommends using native JavaScript date functionality or other modern date libraries like Luxon instead.

In Summary, React is a powerful library for building user interfaces with a focus on efficient rendering and data binding, while moment.js is a lightweight library solely focused on date and time manipulation and formatting.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on React, Moment.js

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceon

Vue.js

React

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k

Comments

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

Decidedon

Vuetify

Vue.js

Nuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

@{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
@{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
@{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
@{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
@{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
@{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
@{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
@{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.

5.13M views5.13M

Comments

Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

React	Moment.js
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.	A javascript date library for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates.
Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 240.3K	GitHub Stars 48.1K
GitHub Forks 49.7K	GitHub Forks 7.0K
Stacks 182.6K	Stacks 7.4K
Followers 147.0K	Followers 297
Votes 4.1K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 837 Components 674 Virtual dom 579 Performance 509 Simplicity 442 Composable Cons 41 Requires discipline to keep architecture organized 30 No predefined way to structure your app 29 Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages 13 JSX 10 Not enterprise friendly	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to React, Moment.js?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Related Comparisons

React vs momentjs: What are the differences?

Introduction

Rendering: React focuses on rendering user interfaces and updating only the necessary components when there are changes in the data. It uses a virtual DOM to efficiently and optimally update the UI. On the other hand, moment.js is primarily used for manipulating and formatting dates and does not offer any rendering capabilities.
Size: React is a fairly large library, with a size of around 100KB when minified and gzipped. This can impact the loading time of the website. On the other hand, moment.js is much smaller, with a size of around 16KB when minified and gzipped. Therefore, if the only requirement is date manipulation and formatting, using moment.js can be a more lightweight option.
Data binding: React provides a powerful and efficient way of binding data to UI components using its virtual DOM and one-way data flow. It allows for easy updating and synchronization of data between components. On the other hand, moment.js does not have any built-in data binding capabilities as it focuses solely on date manipulation and formatting.
Localization: React does not provide any built-in localization support for date and time formatting. However, it can be easily integrated with other libraries, including moment.js, to support localization. Moment.js, on the other hand, offers extensive support for localization and can easily handle date and time formatting in different languages and locales.
API and functionality: React provides a rich set of APIs and functionality for building user interfaces, including components, state management, and lifecycle methods. Moment.js, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive set of APIs and functionalities specifically designed for working with dates and times, such as parsing, formatting, manipulating, and validating dates.
Active development: React is actively developed and maintained by Facebook and a large community of contributors. It has a vibrant ecosystem with a wide range of community-driven libraries and tools. Moment.js, on the other hand, is not actively developed and its development has been put on hold. The moment.js team recommends using native JavaScript date functionality or other modern date libraries like Luxon instead.

React vs momentjs

Overview