StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search Engines
  5. MkDocs vs Wiki.js

MkDocs vs Wiki.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MkDocs
MkDocs
Stacks167
Followers152
Votes14
Wiki.js
Wiki.js
Stacks56
Followers143
Votes2
GitHub Stars27.3K
Forks3.1K

MkDocs vs Wiki.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this task, we will explore the key differences between MkDocs and Wiki.js, both of which are commonly used tools for creating documentation websites. Markdown code will be used for formatting the differences, making it suitable for integration into a website.

  1. Customization Options: MkDocs provides a range of customizable themes and templates, allowing users to tailor the appearance of their documentation website. On the other hand, Wiki.js offers a more limited set of customization options, focused primarily on branding and layout customization.

  2. Collaboration and Editing: MkDocs supports collaboration by integrating with various version control systems, such as Git, enabling multiple contributors to work on the documentation simultaneously. Wiki.js, on the other hand, offers a more user-friendly editing interface, allowing for real-time collaborative editing among team members without the need for any version control system.

  3. Access Control and Permissions: Wiki.js offers more robust access control and permission management features compared to MkDocs. With Wiki.js, admins can define user roles, restrict access to specific pages, and set fine-grained permissions for editing and viewing content. MkDocs provides basic authentication options but lacks the advanced user management capabilities of Wiki.js.

  4. Search Functionality: MkDocs relies on external search options, such as integrating with tools like Elasticsearch or Algolia, to provide advanced search functionality. On the other hand, Wiki.js offers a built-in search feature that allows users to search for content within the documentation website without relying on external services or configurations.

  5. Plugin Ecosystem: MkDocs has a rich ecosystem of plugins that extend its functionality. These plugins can be used to add features like table of contents, syntax highlighting, and integrations with various tools. In contrast, Wiki.js has a more limited plugin ecosystem, with fewer options for extending the core functionality of the platform.

  6. Content Structure and Organization: MkDocs is primarily focused on organizing content hierarchically using folders and markdown files. It follows a traditional hierarchical structure for content organization. Wiki.js, on the other hand, offers a more flexible content organization system with the ability to link between pages, create categories, and use tags to categorize and search for content.

In summary, MkDocs provides extensive customization options, version control integration, and a rich plugin ecosystem, while Wiki.js excels in user-friendly editing, robust access control, built-in search functionality, and flexible content organization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

MkDocs
MkDocs
Wiki.js
Wiki.js

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

It is an open source, modern and powerful wiki app based on Node.js, Git, and Markdown. It runs on the flamingly fast Node.js engine and is optimized to conserve CPU resources.

-
Page permissions; Authentication backends; Host blocking
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
27.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.1K
Stacks
167
Stacks
56
Followers
152
Followers
143
Votes
14
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Gitlab integration
  • 3
    Extensibility
  • 2
    Themes
Cons
  • 1
    Build time increases exponentially as site grows
Pros
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    Fast speed by node.js
Cons
  • 2
    No tree structure by default
Integrations
No integrations available
Markdown
Markdown
Git
Git
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to MkDocs, Wiki.js?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Jekyll

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Swagger UI

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Hugo

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Apiary

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Hexo

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

ReadMe.io

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope