StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Milligram vs Skeleton

Milligram vs Skeleton

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Skeleton
Skeleton
Stacks54
Followers100
Votes24
GitHub Stars19.7K
Forks3.1K
Milligram
Milligram
Stacks38
Followers81
Votes50
GitHub Stars10.2K
Forks738

Milligram vs Skeleton: What are the differences?

Introduction

Milligram and Skeleton are both popular CSS frameworks used for creating responsive websites. While they have similarities in terms of providing a responsive grid and a collection of pre-styled components, there are key differences between the two that set them apart. This article will explore and highlight the main differences between Milligram and Skeleton.

  1. Design Philosophy: Milligram is known for its minimalistic design philosophy, focusing on providing a clean and lightweight base for building websites. It aims to be unopinionated and flexible, allowing developers to customize the design according to their unique needs. On the other hand, Skeleton follows a more opinionated design approach, providing a set of predefined styles and components that promote consistency and a specific aesthetic.

  2. Customization Options: Milligram offers a higher degree of customization compared to Skeleton. It provides a wide range of configuration variables and mixins that allow developers to easily customize various aspects of the framework's design and functionality. This level of flexibility enables developers to create unique and tailored designs. In contrast, Skeleton has fewer customization options and follows a more rigid style, limiting the ability to customize certain elements.

  3. File Size: Milligram has a significantly smaller file size compared to Skeleton. This makes it a favorable choice for projects where optimizing page load times is a priority. Milligram's minimalistic approach ensures that only essential styles are included, resulting in a lightweight framework. On the other hand, Skeleton includes more styles and components, making it slightly larger in file size.

  4. Default Styling: Milligram provides minimal default styling, allowing developers to start with a clean slate and build upon it. It applies only subtle styles to elements like typography and forms, ensuring a less opinionated starting point. In contrast, Skeleton comes with a predefined set of styles that apply to various elements. This can be beneficial for projects requiring a consistent and predefined aesthetic, as developers will spend less time styling and more time building.

  5. Responsive Grid System: Both Milligram and Skeleton include a responsive grid system that allows for easy creation of responsive layouts. However, there are differences in the way the grids are implemented. Milligram utilizes a flexbox-based grid system, which provides more flexibility and control over responsiveness. Skeleton, on the other hand, uses a float-based grid system, which may be simpler to understand for beginners but offers fewer customization options.

  6. Component Library: Skeleton offers a more comprehensive and extensive collection of pre-styled components compared to Milligram. It includes components like navigation bars, tables, buttons, and more, which can save developers time and effort in building these common elements from scratch. Milligram, however, has a more minimalistic approach and provides fewer pre-styled components.

In summary, Milligram and Skeleton differ in their design philosophy, customization options, file size, default styling, grid system, and component library. Milligram focuses on minimalism, flexibility, and customization, with a smaller file size, while Skeleton offers a more opinionated design approach, a larger component library, and a simpler grid system. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the project at hand.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Skeleton
Skeleton
Milligram
Milligram

Skeleton is a small collection of CSS files that can help you rapidly develop sites that look beautiful at any size, be it a 17" laptop screen or an iPhone.

Milligram provides a minimal setup of styles for a fast and clean starting point. Specially designed for better performance and higher productivity with fewer properties to reset resulting in cleaner code.

Responsive Grid Down To Mobile;Fast to Start;Style Agnostic;
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
19.7K
GitHub Stars
10.2K
GitHub Forks
3.1K
GitHub Forks
738
Stacks
54
Stacks
38
Followers
100
Followers
81
Votes
24
Votes
50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Minimalist
  • 6
    Responsive
  • 4
    Simple
  • 2
    Fantastically straight forward
  • 1
    More than an Alternative
Cons
  • 0
    Have to make design decisions
Pros
  • 7
    Minimalist
  • 6
    Weightless
  • 6
    Flexbox
  • 4
    Consistent
  • 4
    Responsiveness

What are some alternatives to Skeleton, Milligram?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase