Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Microsoft IIS vs Uvicorn: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Microsoft IIS and Uvicorn.
Scalability: Microsoft IIS is built for Windows-based environments and is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. It is well-suited for enterprise-level applications that require high scalability and high-performance. On the other hand, Uvicorn is a lightweight ASGI server that is designed to be highly scalable and efficient. It is particularly suited for applications with high concurrency, such as websockets or long-polling.
Platform Compatibility: Microsoft IIS is specifically designed for the Windows operating system and does not support other platforms. It takes advantage of the features and functionalities provided by Windows to deliver optimal performance. In contrast, Uvicorn is a cross-platform server that can run on various operating systems like Windows, Linux, and macOS. This platform compatibility allows developers to work on their preferred environment without restrictions.
Protocol Support: Microsoft IIS primarily supports the HTTP and HTTPS protocols, making it suitable for traditional web applications. It provides advanced features like SSL/TLS encryption, load balancing, and support for various authentication mechanisms. Uvicorn, on the other hand, is built on ASGI (Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface) and supports multiple protocols like HTTP, WebSocket, and HTTP/2. This allows developers to build real-time applications and take advantage of the superior performance provided by ASGI.
Deployment Flexibility: Microsoft IIS is typically used as a standalone web server and requires a Windows server environment for deployment. It integrates tightly with other Microsoft technologies like .NET framework and can run a wide range of application types, including ASP.NET, PHP, and Node.js. Uvicorn, on the other hand, is often used in conjunction with other technologies like Django, Flask, or FastAPI. It can be deployed with various hosting options, including Docker containers, cloud platforms, and traditional web servers.
Configuration and Management: Microsoft IIS provides a rich graphical user interface (GUI) for easy configuration and management. It offers a wide range of options to customize server settings, manage application pools, and set up security features. Uvicorn, being a lightweight server, does not provide a GUI but can be configured using command-line arguments or configuration files. It is designed to be simple and easy to use, with minimal overhead.
Performance and Efficiency: Microsoft IIS is a robust and mature server that offers high performance and stability. It has been optimized for Windows-based environments and provides advanced features like caching, compression, and integrated request processing. Uvicorn, being designed for high-performance applications, achieves excellent efficiency by utilizing asynchronous processing techniques. It leverages the capabilities of modern Python frameworks and libraries to deliver fast and efficient server performance.
In summary, Microsoft IIS is a powerful web server specifically designed for Windows environments, providing excellent scalability and performance for enterprise-level applications. Uvicorn, on the other hand, is a lightweight and cross-platform ASGI server that excels in high-concurrency applications and offers flexibility in deployment options.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
Pros of Microsoft IIS
- Great with .net83
- I'm forced to use iis55
- Use nginx27
- Azure integration18
- Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit15
- Fast10
- Reliable6
- Performance6
- Powerful4
- Simple to configure3
- Webserver3
- Easy setup2
- Shipped with Windows Server1
- Ssl integration1
- Security1
- Охуенный1
Pros of Uvicorn
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Microsoft IIS
- Hard to set up1