Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Mercurial vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Mercurial and Visual Studio Code are two tools that serve different purposes in the software development workflow. While Mercurial is a distributed version control system (DVCS) used to manage source code, Visual Studio Code is a code editor that provides a wide range of features to enhance code writing and development. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Mercurial and Visual Studio Code.
1. Repository Management: Mercurial is primarily designed for repository management, allowing developers to track changes, manage branches, and collaborate with other team members. It provides a centralized repository where all the source code is stored, and users can clone, push, and pull changes from this central repository. On the other hand, Visual Studio Code does not offer built-in repository management capabilities. It relies on third-party extensions like Git to provide version control integration.
2. Code Editing and Development: Visual Studio Code is primarily focused on code editing and development. It provides a rich set of features such as syntax highlighting, code completion, debugging, and integrated terminal, enabling developers to write, refactor, and debug code efficiently. Mercurial, on the other hand, does not provide code editing features. It is solely focused on version control and does not offer any capabilities for code development.
3. Collaboration and Teamwork: Mercurial promotes collaboration among team members by allowing multiple developers to work on the same codebase simultaneously. It provides features like merging and branching that facilitate collaboration and enable developers to work on different features or bug fixes in parallel. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, is primarily designed for individual developers and does not offer advanced collaboration features.
4. Integration with IDEs and Tools: Visual Studio Code is highly extensible and allows developers to integrate with various IDEs and tools. It provides a rich ecosystem of extensions that enhance its functionality, including integrations with popular IDEs like Visual Studio and Eclipse. Mercurial, on the other hand, is a standalone tool that does not have direct integration with IDEs. It can be used alongside IDEs, but it does not provide seamless integration like Visual Studio Code.
5. Support for Multiple Programming Languages: Visual Studio Code is known for its excellent language support. It offers built-in support for various programming languages, including but not limited to JavaScript, Python, Java, and C#. It provides features like IntelliSense, code snippets, and debugging capabilities specific to each language. Mercurial, however, is programming language agnostic and does not offer any language-specific features.
In Summary, Mercurial is a distributed version control system focused on repository management, collaboration, and version control, while Visual Studio Code is a code editor focused on code editing, development, and integration with IDEs and tools.
Lightweight and versatile. Huge library of extensions that enable you to integrate a host of services to your development environment. VS Code's biggest strength is its library of extensions which enables it to directly compete with every single major IDE for almost all major programming languages.
Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.
Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.
I decided to choose VSCode over Sublime text for my Systems Programming class in C. What I love about VSCode is its awesome ability to add extensions. Intellisense is a beautiful debugger, and Remote SSH allows me to login and make real-time changes in VSCode to files on my university server. This is an awesome alternative to going back and forth on pushing/pulling code and logging into servers in the terminal. Great choice for anyone interested in C programming!
Pros of Mercurial
- A lot easier to extend than git18
- Easy-to-grasp system with nice tools17
- Works on windows natively without cygwin nonsense13
- Written in python11
- Free9
- Fast8
- Better than Git6
- Best GUI6
- Better than svn4
- Hg inc2
- Good user experience2
- TortoiseHg - Unified free gui for all platforms2
- Consistent UI2
- Easy-to-use2
- Native support to all platforms2
- Free to use1
Pros of Visual Studio Code
- Powerful multilanguage IDE340
- Fast308
- Front-end develop out of the box193
- Support TypeScript IntelliSense158
- Very basic but free142
- Git integration126
- Intellisense106
- Faster than Atom78
- Better ui, easy plugins, and nice git integration53
- Great Refactoring Tools45
- Good Plugins44
- Terminal42
- Superb markdown support38
- Open Source36
- Extensions35
- Awesome UI26
- Large & up-to-date extension community26
- Powerful and fast24
- Portable22
- Best editor18
- Best code editor18
- Easy to get started with17
- Lots of extensions15
- Good for begginers15
- Crossplatform15
- Built on Electron15
- Open, cross-platform, fast, monthly updates14
- Extensions for everything14
- All Languages Support14
- Easy to use and learn13
- Extensible12
- "fast, stable & easy to use"12
- Ui design is great11
- Useful for begginer11
- Totally customizable11
- Git out of the box11
- Faster edit for slow computer11
- SSH support10
- Great community10
- Fast Startup10
- Great language support9
- It has terminal and there are lots of shortcuts in it9
- Works With Almost EveryThing You Need9
- Powerful Debugger9
- Can compile and run .py files8
- Python extension is fast8
- Great document formater7
- Features rich7
- He is not Michael6
- Awesome multi cursor support6
- She is not Rachel6
- Extension Echosystem6
- VSCode.pro Course makes it easy to learn5
- SFTP Workspace5
- Very proffesional5
- Language server client5
- Easy azure5
- Has better support and more extentions for debugging4
- Supports lots of operating systems4
- Virtualenv integration4
- Excellent as git difftool and mergetool4
- Emmet preinstalled3
- More tools to integrate with vs3
- Has more than enough languages for any developer3
- Better autocompletes than Atom3
- 'batteries included'3
- Microsoft2
- Light2
- Big extension marketplace2
- CMake support with autocomplete2
- Fast and ruby is built right in2
- VS Code Server: Browser version of VS Code2
- Customizable2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Mercurial
- Track single upstream only0
- Does not distinguish between local and remote head0
Cons of Visual Studio Code
- Slow startup46
- Resource hog at times29
- Poor refactoring20
- Poor UI Designer13
- Weak Ui design tools11
- Poor autocomplete10
- Super Slow8
- Huge cpu usage with few installed extension8
- Microsoft sends telemetry data8
- Poor in PHP7
- It's MicroSoft6
- Poor in Python3
- No Built in Browser Preview3
- No color Intergrator3
- Very basic for java development and buggy at times3
- No built in live Preview3
- Electron3
- Bad Plugin Architecture2
- Powered by Electron2
- Terminal does not identify path vars sometimes1
- Slow C++ Language Server1