Materialize vs Symfony

Overview

Symfony

Stacks8.5K

Followers6.2K

Votes1.1K

GitHub Stars30.7K

Forks9.7K

Materialize

Stacks698

Followers1.2K

Votes557

GitHub Stars39.1K

Forks4.7K

Materialize vs Symfony: What are the differences?

Introduction: Materialize and Symfony are two popular tools in web development, each serving different purposes. Below are the key differences between Materialize and Symfony.

Purpose and Use Case: Materialize is primarily a front-end framework used for designing responsive web layouts with predefined CSS and JavaScript components. On the other hand, Symfony is a back-end framework written in PHP that focuses on building robust web applications and APIs with MVC architecture.
Technology Stack: Materialize is based on CSS, JavaScript, and HTML, providing ready-to-use components for web design. Symfony, however, is built on PHP, with additional features like Doctrine ORM for database management, Twig for templating, and PHPUnit for testing.
Learning Curve: Materialize is relatively easy to learn due to its simple and well-documented components, making it ideal for beginners and small projects. Symfony, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve, requiring a strong understanding of PHP and MVC concepts, making it more suitable for complex web applications.
Community and Support: Materialize has a large community of developers contributing to its development and providing support through forums and documentation. Symfony, being a renowned PHP framework, has a vast community with extensive resources like bundles, extensions, and community-driven support channels.
Scalability and Flexibility: Materialize is more focused on providing aesthetic design elements and responsiveness for front-end development, limiting its scalability for large-scale projects. Symfony, with its robust architecture and modular components, offers greater scalability and flexibility for handling complex web applications and scaling them as needed.
Performance and Optimization: Materialize can impact performance due to its reliance on CSS and JavaScript for rendering components, potentially slowing down page loading times. Symfony, when optimized correctly, can offer better performance by leveraging features like caching, database optimizations, and code profiling.

In Summary, Materialize and Symfony differ in their purpose, technology stack, learning curve, community support, scalability, and performance optimizations, catering to distinct needs in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Symfony, Materialize

Fabian

May 5, 2020

Needs adviceon

GraphQL

C++

Symfony

I'm about to begin working on an API, for which I plan to add GraphQL connectivity for processing data. The data processed will mainly be audio files being downloaded/uploaded with some user messaging & authentication.

I don't mind the difficulty in any service since I've used C++ (for data structures & algorithms at least) and would also say I am patient and can learn fairly quickly. My main concerns would be their performance, libraries/community, and job marketability.

Why I'm stuck between these three...

Symfony: I've programmed in PHP for back-end in a previous internship and may do so again in a few months.

Node.js: It's newer than PHP, and it's JavaScript where my front-end stack will be React and (likely) React Native.

Golang: It's newer than PHP, I've heard of its good performance, and it would be nice to learn a new (growing) language.

2.4M views2.4M

Comments

Filippo

Aug 27, 2020

Review

In my humble opinion the best available php platform is "API Platform". I have tried a lot of backend frameworks in the last 10 years, and that is one of the best, at least in the PHP ecosystem. It's based on Symfony, it supports plenty of features like Swagger docs, Rest API, GraphQL. You can plugin React Admin to have a full admin in no time. But the best part in my opinion it's how you can easily extend the backend taking advantage of the ORM Doctrine (which is one of the most mature available across all technologies) and all the plugins of Symfony. The fact that the Doctrine entities are in automatic relation and they can be exposed as GraphQL it's a big win if you have a complex database. It is also possible to reverse engineering an existing database and create automatically all the entities, admin, restapi, graphql endpoints ... welcome to the future :)

45 views45

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Symfony	Materialize
It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..	A CSS Framework based on material design.
-	Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Statistics
GitHub Stars 30.7K	GitHub Stars 39.1K
GitHub Forks 9.7K	GitHub Forks 4.7K
Stacks 8.5K	Stacks 698
Followers 6.2K	Followers 1.2K
Votes 1.1K	Votes 557
Pros & Cons
Pros 177 Open source 149 Php 130 Community 129 Dependency injection 122 Professional Cons 10 Too many dependency 8 Lot of config files 4 YMAL 3 Feature creep 1 Bloated	Pros 102 Google material design 74 Easy to use 74 Responsive 54 Modern looks 48 Open source Cons 7 Mobile errors 6 Poor Grid System 2 Unmaintained
Integrations
CakePHP PHP ReactPHP	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Symfony, Materialize?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Materialize vs Symfony: What are the differences?

Introduction: Materialize and Symfony are two popular tools in web development, each serving different purposes. Below are the key differences between Materialize and Symfony.

Purpose and Use Case: Materialize is primarily a front-end framework used for designing responsive web layouts with predefined CSS and JavaScript components. On the other hand, Symfony is a back-end framework written in PHP that focuses on building robust web applications and APIs with MVC architecture.
Technology Stack: Materialize is based on CSS, JavaScript, and HTML, providing ready-to-use components for web design. Symfony, however, is built on PHP, with additional features like Doctrine ORM for database management, Twig for templating, and PHPUnit for testing.
Learning Curve: Materialize is relatively easy to learn due to its simple and well-documented components, making it ideal for beginners and small projects. Symfony, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve, requiring a strong understanding of PHP and MVC concepts, making it more suitable for complex web applications.
Community and Support: Materialize has a large community of developers contributing to its development and providing support through forums and documentation. Symfony, being a renowned PHP framework, has a vast community with extensive resources like bundles, extensions, and community-driven support channels.
Scalability and Flexibility: Materialize is more focused on providing aesthetic design elements and responsiveness for front-end development, limiting its scalability for large-scale projects. Symfony, with its robust architecture and modular components, offers greater scalability and flexibility for handling complex web applications and scaling them as needed.
Performance and Optimization: Materialize can impact performance due to its reliance on CSS and JavaScript for rendering components, potentially slowing down page loading times. Symfony, when optimized correctly, can offer better performance by leveraging features like caching, database optimizations, and code profiling.

Materialize vs Symfony

Overview