Materialize vs Spring

Overview

Spring

Stacks3.9K

Followers4.8K

Votes1.1K

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

Materialize

Stacks698

Followers1.2K

Votes557

GitHub Stars39.1K

Forks4.7K

Materialize vs Spring: What are the differences?

Architecture: Materialize focuses on providing a modern and responsive design system for web interfaces, utilizing HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. On the other hand, Spring offers a comprehensive framework for building enterprise Java applications with extensive support for dependency injection, aspect-oriented programming, and more.
Technology Stack: Materialize primarily deals with front-end technologies, offering ready-to-use components like buttons, forms, and navigation bars. Contrastingly, Spring operates on the Java ecosystem, incorporating technologies such as Spring Boot, Spring MVC, Hibernate, and more to handle back-end functionality and database operations.
Purpose: Materialize is best suited for designers and front-end developers looking to create visually appealing and responsive websites or web applications. In comparison, Spring is targeted towards Java developers working on enterprise-level applications that require robust backend functionalities and scalability.
Community Support: Materialize has a vibrant community revolving around front-end development and design, offering resources and support for utilizing the framework effectively. Spring, being a widely adopted Java framework, boasts a large community of developers contributing to various projects, providing extensive documentation and support channels.
Learning Curve: Materialize is relatively easy to learn and implement for front-end developers due to its straightforward structure and customizable components. Conversely, Spring has a steeper learning curve, especially for beginners, as it encompasses various modules and concepts like inversion of control and aspect-oriented programming.
Scalability: Materialize is well-suited for small to medium-scale projects where the focus is more on design aesthetics and responsiveness. Spring, on the other hand, shines in large-scale enterprise applications where scalability, security, and performance are paramount considerations.

In Summary, Materialize is more focused on front-end design and responsiveness, while Spring is an enterprise-level Java framework with a comprehensive feature set for building robust web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Spring, Materialize

Tushar

Jan 7, 2021

Needs adviceon

Spring

Spring Boot

Django

Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.

Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.

827k views827k

Comments

Anonymous

Dec 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring

Java

Node.js

I am provided with the opportunity to learn one of these technologies during my training. I have prior experience with Spring and found it tough and still haven't figured out when to use what annotations among the thousands of annotations provided. On the other hand, I am very proficient in Java data structures and algorithms (custom comparators, etc.)

I have used Node.js and found it interesting, but I am wondering If I am taking the risk of choosing a framework that has a comparatively lesser scope in the future. One advantage I see with the node.js is the number of tutorials available and the ease with which I can code.

Please recommend which path to take. Is Spring learnable, or should I spend my energy on learning Node.js instead?

290k views290k

Comments

Kamrul

Aug 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

Django

Spring Boot

I am a graduate student working as a software engineer in a company. For my personal development, I want to learn web development. I have some experience in Springboot while I was in university. So I want to continue with spring-boot, but I heard about Django. I'm reaching out to the experts here to help me choose a future proof framework. Django or Spring Boot?

Thanks in Advance

502k views502k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring	Materialize
A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.	A CSS Framework based on material design.
-	Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.1K	GitHub Stars 39.1K
GitHub Forks 38.8K	GitHub Forks 4.7K
Stacks 3.9K	Stacks 698
Followers 4.8K	Followers 1.2K
Votes 1.1K	Votes 557
Pros & Cons
Pros 230 Java 157 Open source 136 Great community 123 Very powerful 114 Enterprise Cons 15 Draws you into its own ecosystem and bloat 4 Poor documentation 3 Verbose configuration 3 Java 2 Java is more verbose language in compare to python	Pros 102 Google material design 74 Responsive 74 Easy to use 54 Modern looks 48 Open source Cons 7 Mobile errors 6 Poor Grid System 2 Unmaintained
Integrations
Java	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Spring, Materialize?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Materialize vs Spring: What are the differences?

Architecture: Materialize focuses on providing a modern and responsive design system for web interfaces, utilizing HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. On the other hand, Spring offers a comprehensive framework for building enterprise Java applications with extensive support for dependency injection, aspect-oriented programming, and more.
Technology Stack: Materialize primarily deals with front-end technologies, offering ready-to-use components like buttons, forms, and navigation bars. Contrastingly, Spring operates on the Java ecosystem, incorporating technologies such as Spring Boot, Spring MVC, Hibernate, and more to handle back-end functionality and database operations.
Purpose: Materialize is best suited for designers and front-end developers looking to create visually appealing and responsive websites or web applications. In comparison, Spring is targeted towards Java developers working on enterprise-level applications that require robust backend functionalities and scalability.
Community Support: Materialize has a vibrant community revolving around front-end development and design, offering resources and support for utilizing the framework effectively. Spring, being a widely adopted Java framework, boasts a large community of developers contributing to various projects, providing extensive documentation and support channels.
Learning Curve: Materialize is relatively easy to learn and implement for front-end developers due to its straightforward structure and customizable components. Conversely, Spring has a steeper learning curve, especially for beginners, as it encompasses various modules and concepts like inversion of control and aspect-oriented programming.
Scalability: Materialize is well-suited for small to medium-scale projects where the focus is more on design aesthetics and responsiveness. Spring, on the other hand, shines in large-scale enterprise applications where scalability, security, and performance are paramount considerations.

Materialize vs Spring

Overview